“highly significant”

On the other hand, PEI original , and especially PEI NEW , showed highly significant differences among the three groups (p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ). 3.3.

This difference was highly significant (OR = 17.8, 95% CI = 3.8–82.8, P < 0.001).

Regarding the APACHE II score, there was a highly significant increase in the failed extubation group (p<0.001) ( Table 1 ) and a significant negative correlation between the APACHE II score and DE (p=0.002) but not between the APACHE II score and DTF (p=0.053).

Statistical significance was set as follows: * p < 0.05 indicates significant difference, ** p < 0.01 indicates highly significant difference, *** p < 0.001 indicates highly significant difference; when p > 0.05, it was labeled as n.s., which indicated that the difference between groups was not statistically significant. 3.

The PRISM III score showed an inverse relationship with the outcome; the mean PRISM III scores for survivors and non-survivors were 12.06 ± 3.35 and 22.94 ± 8.93 with a highly significant P value <0.001.

Importantly, a highly significant relationship was found between serum CO3-610 and portal hypertension ( r = 0.84; P < 0.001).

The association between socioeconomic class and risk status was highly significant statistically ( P < 0.001).

p-value≤0.0001 is considered as extremely significant (****), p≤0.001 as highly significant (***), p≤0.01 as very significant (**), p≤0.05 as significant (*), and p>0.05 as not significant (ns), respectively. 10.7554/eLife.58374.sa1 Decision letter Macleod Kay F Reviewing Editor University of Chicago United States In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Pulp vitality was the variable that was most likely associated with EPLs and showed a very high odds ratio of 260.15, which was highly significant (p=0.001).

5 D, P = 0.018), and GSE65858 displaying a highly significant relationship ( Fig. 5 E, P < 0.001). 3.5.

* p < 0.05 (considered significant compared with control group); ** p < 0.01 (considered highly significant); *** p < 0.001 (considered extremely significant).

The model was highly significant (GLM, P < 0.001), explaining 26%, 34% and 86% of the variance for latitude, longitude and depth, respectively (Suppl.

2 , 3 D) Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA revaled highly significant differences among all time periods in terms of cellular number ( P < 0.001).

Our study showed that flooding has a highly significant effect ( P <0.001) on AMF diversity (based on phylotype richness, Shannon's index and phylotype composition), and the effects are dependent on the degree of flooding.

Pairwise F ST between the Alpine–Carpathian and northeastern European regions was moderate and highly significant ( F ST = 0.119, P < 0.001, Table 2 ), as was the differentiation between the Alpine–Carpathian and Asian regions ( F ST = 0.181, P < 0.001, Table 2 ).

1 A, there was, however, a highly significant Accuracy x Side interaction (F(1/9) = 69.7, p < 0.001, ŋ 2 = 0.875).

Specifically, a highly significant difference in MEI between the main and lateral shoot groups was observed in both the early (p < 0.001) and late (p < 0.001) periods, but not in the middle period (p = 0.320).

Results: We found a highly significant correlation between the HR measured with the Holter monitor and HR measured with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r = 0.77, p < 0.001).

At 66 h, a highly significant increase in Cerc-193 was detected ( P < 0.001), most marked in Rim11 and Rim28 10-μm treatments.

The effect of time was highly significant ( F (1.77, 529.13) = 54.54, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.15) and is described by a significant rise in strain from pre to peak pandemic ( t (306) = 7.07, p < 0.001, d = 0.40 [0.29; 0.52]), which was followed by an even sharper decline from peak to downturn ( t (306) = − 16.23, p < 0.001, d = − 0.93 [− 1.06; − 0.79]) that resulted in values even below the pre-pandemic baseline ( t (306) = − 7.73, p < 0.001, d = − 0.44 [− 0.56; − 0.32]).

Post-booster anti-HBs showed highly significant higher levels (anamnestic response) compared to their pre-booster mean level (123.3±20.1 vs. 0.6±7.6 IU/L, respectively, p < 0.001).

Preeclampsia with severe features was highly significant in women with seizure disorder in this study (p<0.001) and it was found to be nearly three times more common in women with seizure disorder [adjusted relative risk (aRR)=3.16, CI: 1.67-6.43].

The result for the type difference is found to be highly significant by both the F test (p < 0.001) and the SEM test (p < 0.001), and finally the sex x type interaction is statistically nonsignificant for the F test (p = 0.186) and the SEM test (p = 0.184).

Additionally, responders reported significantly higher baseline PTSD severity score on HTQ (median = 3.2, IQR = 0.4) compared to non-responders (median = 2.6, IQR = 0.6), with a highly significant difference (U=474.5 p < 0.001).

The 'U'-shaped shape of the age curve for earache is confirmed using multiple regression by a highly significant quadratic effect of age after taking the linear effect into account (p < .001).