“highly significant”

The penKid exhibited a highly significant difference between groups, with a median = 2.97 ng/mL (2.29, 5.62) in the AKI group compared to median = 1.94 ng/mL (1.69, 2.42) in the non-AKI group ( p = 0.001).

Despite the fact that in the total population the decrease in the angulation between the mandibular plane and the axis of the mandibular central incisors was highly significant (mean = −10.24°, P < 0.001), an increase in alveolar height, expressed as the distance from the “D” point to the alveolar crest, was not evident in 42.4% of the cases.

For the intraosseous PRGF group, the improvements in Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sports/recreation, and Quality of Life were highly significant ( p < 0.001) at all time-points compared to their baseline values.

The fact that rrTNBC versus srTNBC differences in median DFS, PFI, PRS, and OS remained highly significant (all p < 0.001) in both the overall cohort and the platinum-subgroup indicates that the prognostic impact of the rrTNBC phenotype is robust and independent of treatment line or regimen selection.

Once again, classification accuracy was highly significant (p < 0.001; chance accuracy 50.50–51.84%).

The association remained highly significant after adjustments for age and sex (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.72; P <0.001) and after serial additions of family history of SCD, NYHA functional class III to IV, and obstructive physiology in the model ( Table 4 ).

The predictive performance was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for the primary indications of several prescriptions, including Bojungikgi-tang ( p = 0.0001), Sosiho-tang ( p = 0.0001), Banhahubak-tang ( p = 0.0003), and Hwanglyeonhaedok-tang ( p = 0.0007), as well as for the all indication category of Daeshiho-tang ( p = 0.0001) and Banhasasim-tang ( p = 0.0001).

Logistic regression analysis yielded highly significant associations (χ 2 = 14.5, p < 0.001) and strong model fit metrics (AUC = 0.811; R 2 McF = 0.262), validating the discrimination power of this variable.

We found that elevations in lead V1 conferred an increased risk of CVD for both genders and age groups ( Figure 2 ) and thus, within our subgroup of young men, we found elevations in V1 to be associated with a highly significant increased risk of CVD as evidenced by an HR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.35, P <0.001) for elevations between 100 to 150 μV and an HR of 1.94 (95% CI 1.25 to 3.01, P =0.005) for elevations ≥150 μV compared with a nondeviating ST‐segment (−50 μV to +50 μV).

While the higher number of flying prey captured by wetted pitchers remained highly significant at the level of the individual pitcher (deviance 6,7 = 13.22, p < 0.001), the difference in ant captures between the two experimental conditions was ‘concealed’ in the outlier range of the distribution (deviance 6,7 = 0.006, p = 0.94; figure 3 a ).

The general linear model ( Figure 1 b) revealed that SOM had a highly significant positive effect on yield ( p < 0.001), while AP was not statistically significant ( p = 0.294).

The two-way ANOVA marked the effect of both variables “Variety” (Genotypes) and “Combination” (Variable Proline Concentrations) as highly significant (p<0.001) ( Table 9 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between both proteins ( p < 0.001).

9 for anteriorization with a highly significant p value ( P = 0.001).[ 1 ] This implies that disinsertion tended to be used for lesser degrees of IOOA while anterior displacement tended to be used for larger amounts of IOOA and myectomy for intermediate levels.

In addition, a one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences in growth among the four fungal species evaluated ( Penicillium , Trichoderma , Fusarium , and Aspergillus ) (F = 48.25, p < 0.001).

ANOVA revealed a highly significant group effect for bone marrow MDA levels (F(2,27) = 59.799, p < 0.001).

Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) revealed a highly significant effect of sea-ice stage on narwhal acoustic activity ( p < 0.001).

In S3 treatment, AP exhibited significant negative correlations with several microorganisms ( p ≤ 0.01) but showed a highly significant positive correlation with Ascomycota ( p ≤ 0.001).

The decrease could be detected in 23 out of 24 patients and was highly significant (p<0.001).

For instance, in our study choice RTs to two-target trials are 18 ms longer on average than single target RTs, an effect highly significant (p < 0.001) and clearly expected from the literature ( Leach and Carpenter, 2001 ).

Between the first two time points and also between the first and last time point, a statistically highly significant difference was seen (both p < 0.001).

Increasing the background noise level by 3dB gave a highly significant reduction of correct answers in the listening test (F1,57 = 533.3; p<0.001).

The differences in epg before and after treatments were highly significant (P <0.001) for each helminth at each sampling time and for each antiparasitic drug.

In this study, FAEs, hemicellulose, as well as cellulose showed a highly significant correlation with Bacillus ( p < 0.001) in corn bran silage and whole-plant corn silage.

A detailed statistical analysis shows an overall highly significant effect of the treatment on the angular deviation ( X 2 = 23.7455; p < 0.001).