“highly significant”

In the case of each debate, the difference in assessment between the two groups of supporters was highly significant (χ 2 = 255.52, P < 0.001; χ 2 = 257.28, P < 0.001, respectively), and both groups differed from undecided voters (all χ 2 s > 19.84, P s < 0.001).

Still, the random effect of level 3 (healthcare centers) showed a highly significant measure for health centers (14.62, p<0.001).

The Kruskal Wallis statistical test revealed that while comparing the three groups, it was found to be very highly significant at P <0.001.

There was no significant correlation found between cases and searches at day 7 ( P = 0.178) but highly significant, strong correlations at days 12 ( r = 0.978, P ≤ 0.001) and nineteen ( r = 0.973, P ≤ 0.001).

In all the groups (Groups I, II, III, and IV), the difference in microleakage scores in the enamel and cementum margins is highly significant ( P < 0.001), whereas in Group V, the difference was very significant ( P < 0.01) between microleakage scores in the enamel and cementum margins.

After including occupation as a covariate, analysis of covariance results confirmed that the central-route effect of DAQ remained highly significant ( F 1,235 =58.227; P <.001), whereas occupation itself did not yield a significant effect ( F 1,235 =0.681; P =.41).

The correlation coefficient between growth of new cases and Google search interest (past 7 days) is highly significant ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001).

In addition, results highlight that past exposure to risk while travelling is a highly significant factor distinguishing the tourist segments ( p = 0.001).

These findings, along with the observation that presence of multiple illnesses was significantly more common among the depressives, could support the contention that depressive illness in the elderly might have some relation to generalised degenerative changes that occur with advancing age in various body systems (Jacoby, 1982). Among the specific illnesses, the difference in prevalence between the patient and control groups was highly significant for hypertension (p < 0.001).

Lipids and Metabolic Syndrome In the long term, the improvement in triglyceride levels was highly significant ( P < .001).

Figure 2 shows the highly significant main effect of ROI ( F (2, 481) = 547.49, p < .001), with highest responses in the MO region and lowest responses in the LOT region ( t (481) LOT‐MO = −30.98, t (480) LOT‐ROT = −5.26, t (481) ROT‐MO = −25.76, all p Bonferroni < .001).

Linkage disequilibrium, non‐random association among pairs of loci due to lack of recombination, within clone‐corrected haplotypes of these two populations was highly significant ( P < 0.001, in both cases; Table 3 ).

Further examination of trends in standardized fruit size across positions in the two environments separately using quadratic regression confirms a negative linear decline in both environments and reveals a highly significant nonlinear (concave) decline in fruit size only for individuals under a constrained season (quadratic parameter estimate = –0.764 ± 0.109, t = 7.00, p < .001) and not under a long season (quadratic parameter estimate = 0.143 ± 0.093, t = 1.54, p = .125).

This was highly significant ( P < 0·001) and was more effective for thin than for thick AKs ( P < 0·001), as has been noted with most other therapies, including PDT. 15 , 16 Our study included hyperkeratotic AKs and acral sites, both of which are associated with higher rates of treatment failure. 6 , 17 AKs larger than the microwave probe diameter were not excluded in this study.

activity (r) = -0.17 (N.S.) There is a highly significant correlation (r = 0.81, p<.001) between two values of platelet MAO activity for the whole group.

Though this find- ing is contrary to expectations when com- pared with general population surveys, it may be due to: (a) the process of selection of inmates to the facility which includes only one segment of society, and (b) the al- ready considered high morbidity rates. 308 NEUROPSYCHIATRY MORBIDITY IN A BEGGARS* COLONY The highly significant (p<.001) differ- ence noted with regard to marital status and education (the ill being more often single and less educated) is likely to be a function of the high rates of mental retardation, epi- lepsy and schizophrenia in them.

The model fit was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

As shown in Table 4 , there was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the availability of dairy farm infrastructure, dairy cow health and extension service delivery, farm hygienic condition and waste management practices, and farm reproductive performance.

This difference was highly significant (χ2 = 134.751, p < .001), corroborating the findings of Wilmer et al. and Shujiao et al.

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic was 0.957 and Bartlett’s test was highly significant (p<0.001), indicating that the PCA was deemed appropriate for the data.

For type 13, we found highly significant selection ( P <0.001) in landraces of Indonesia and the Philippines, especially in japonica rice.

Soil magnetic, physico-chemical, and contamination patterns revealed by principal component analysis (PCA) Bartlett’s test yielded a highly significant result (χ 2 = 4507.6, df = 378, p < 0.001), indicating strong correlations among variables and justifying the application of PCA.

According to DOT per 1 000 patient-days, there was a highly significant decrease in consumption of ceftriaxone and levofloxacin, by 19.1% (p < 0.001) and 49.9% (p < 0.001), respectively ( Table 2 ).

The opposite correlation between Black concentration and accessibility in urban and rural areas is further supported by the negative and highly significant term of “Rurality: Black” (2SFCA: −0.045, 2SVCA: −0.046, P < 0.001) in the 3-way ANOVA in Table 2 .

Overall, epigenetic age exceeded chronological age by a highly significant margin (paired t(29) = 9.77, p < 0.001, 95% CI 15.28–23.36).