“highly significant”

This difference was highly significant at p < 0.001 ( Figure 1A ).

For fixation duration, there was a highly significant effect of AOI type (F(1,29)=54.23, p <.001) and painting group (F(2,58)=15.16, p <.001).

The difference between the two longest viewed works and the other paintings is highly significant (p< 0.001, d=0.9).

The degree of correlation between the two assessors was highly significant ( ρ = 0.54, n = 88, p < 0.001).

Behavioural results A 2-way ANOVA including emotion and odour as factors revealed a highly significant emotion main effect (F = 85.606; p < 0.001; Greenhouse-Geisser corrected).

The correlation between the usefulness rating and the modified DISCERN score and the GQS was moderately negative ( r = −.474 and r = −.450, respectively) and highly significant ( p < 0.001 for both; Table 5 ).

Statistical values were considered significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant when P < 0.001.

Statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test confirmed this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating effective depletion of the gut microbiota following antibiotic treatment (Figure S1A ).

Despite the low KMO, we proceeded with the exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis because Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant ( χ 2 = 18,324, p < 0.001), indicating that there were non‐random correlations among at least some variables in our cohort.

There was a highly significant trend regarding education (36.4% with elementary schooling; 41.5% with intermediate education; 55.1% with higher schooling or university degrees; p < 0.001).

Additionally, all variances of similarities were highly significant and were increased in FEBD (all p values< .001).

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed a highly significant variation ( P < 0.001) among populations ( F ST ), and phylogenetic analysis revealed that populations from the two mountain systems formed their own distinct clade with >90% bootstrap support.

However, when seeds in 2010 were spread in full light on top of the soil, final average germination was 58% (±2%) ( Figure 3 ); the difference in germination to seeds mixed with soil being highly significant ( P < 0.001).

All observed differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

However,for healthy controls, highly significant correlations (p<0.001) were observed in the right and left frontal and occipital regions for all frequency bands.

The difference between the CD105 positive and the negative group regarding the response to therapy was highly significant ( X 2 14.383* MC P-value <0.001).

We found a close link between treatment regimen and side effects as revealed by a linear regression model in which the mere number of drugs taken simultaneously explained a highly significant ( p < 0.001) proportion of the observed variance in side effects irrespective of the substances involved: 17.8% of the variance of sexuality-related side effects, 11.8% of the variance in gastrointestinal disturbances, 13.3% of the variance in cardiac-respiratory disturbances, and 18.4% of the variance in cardiovascular disturbances.

Using the NTCP model, the risk of late grade ≥ 2 dysphagia was 25.8% [IQR 19–38%] in the clinical plans and 19.6% [16–26%] in the margin-less plans, which translates into a median ΔNTCP of 6.0% [3.4–8.5%], highly significant ( p < 0.001), all with baseline at 0.

In addition, the PCA also showed that each stage could be distinguished from the other stages, and the R value of the Anosim was 0.5926 and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The onset of hypoxia triggered a highly significant ( P < 0.001) avoidance response, i.e. migration onto clumps.

Among these: Variants 5, 6, 7, 9, and 15 showed highly significant associations with disease severity ( p < 0.001).

The prevalence rates in Western European (10.9%) and ethnic minority women (14.6%) with the WHO criteria were not significantly different ( P =0.14), but with the modified IADPSG criteria, the difference was highly significant (24 and 36.8% respectively, P <0.001; Fig. 1 , Table 2 ).

The difference between inhibitor titers at 1 month (i.e., prior to immune modulation) and all times points after immune modulation was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The reduction in mean body weight from baseline to visit 4 in CGA-7 group (2.63 ± 1.46) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) as compared to placebo (−0.67 ± 1.54).

This was statistically highly significant with P < 0.001, as depicted in Table 1 .