“highly significant”

Although this average for 44 countries (2009–2019) was only moderately above that of the HDI for all 189 countries in both 2009 (mean 0.677 ± 0.157) and 2017 (mean 0.709 ± 0.152), the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test).

Bartlett's test is highly significant ( χ 2 = 993.6; ddl = 28; p value < 0.001), and therefore factor analysis is appropriate.

The effect of fertility status of the bulls was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for JAC and ABL accounting for 47.64 and 21.65% of the total variance observed in the produced MFI upon lectin binding.

Mixed linear model analysis of these data showed that the hyperopic shift induced by red light was highly significant ( P < 0.001) while the refractive change under blue light was not significant ( P = 0.49).

The difference was highly significant ( P = 0.001).

All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001) apart from those between birthweight and the 8, 12, 17, and 22 weeks weight of Av BW pigs ( P < 0.05).

The correlation coefficient between growth of new cases and Google search interest (past 7 days) is highly significant ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001).

In addition, results highlight that past exposure to risk while travelling is a highly significant factor distinguishing the tourist segments ( p = 0.001).

Figure 2 shows the highly significant main effect of ROI ( F (2, 481) = 547.49, p < .001), with highest responses in the MO region and lowest responses in the LOT region ( t (481) LOT‐MO = −30.98, t (480) LOT‐ROT = −5.26, t (481) ROT‐MO = −25.76, all p Bonferroni < .001).

Linkage disequilibrium, non‐random association among pairs of loci due to lack of recombination, within clone‐corrected haplotypes of these two populations was highly significant ( P < 0.001, in both cases; Table 3 ).

Further examination of trends in standardized fruit size across positions in the two environments separately using quadratic regression confirms a negative linear decline in both environments and reveals a highly significant nonlinear (concave) decline in fruit size only for individuals under a constrained season (quadratic parameter estimate = –0.764 ± 0.109, t = 7.00, p < .001) and not under a long season (quadratic parameter estimate = 0.143 ± 0.093, t = 1.54, p = .125).

This was highly significant ( P < 0·001) and was more effective for thin than for thick AKs ( P < 0·001), as has been noted with most other therapies, including PDT. 15 , 16 Our study included hyperkeratotic AKs and acral sites, both of which are associated with higher rates of treatment failure. 6 , 17 AKs larger than the microwave probe diameter were not excluded in this study.

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic was 0.957 and Bartlett’s test was highly significant (p<0.001), indicating that the PCA was deemed appropriate for the data.

For type 13, we found highly significant selection ( P <0.001) in landraces of Indonesia and the Philippines, especially in japonica rice.

According to DOT per 1 000 patient-days, there was a highly significant decrease in consumption of ceftriaxone and levofloxacin, by 19.1% (p < 0.001) and 49.9% (p < 0.001), respectively ( Table 2 ).

Anterior/posterior and hemisphere main effects were highly significant ( F = 57.27; p < 0.001 and F = 17.03; p < 0.001, respectively), condition main effect was not significant ( F = 3.05; p = 0.094).

An inferential statistical paired t test on approximately normal data showed that the pre–post increase in wellbeing was highly significant, t (19) = 6.96, p < .001, one-tailed.

After obtaining highly significant results ( p < 0.001) for both factors and their interactions, mean values of linear shrinkage, DC, shrinkage stress, maximum shrinkage stress rate, and time to achieve maximum shrinkage stress rate were compared among the composites using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Subsequently uterine abnormalities accounted for 5.7% of cases and were highly significant (p = 0.001).

The correlation between the number of olfactory disorders and reported COVID-19 patients in all provinces up to March 17, 2020 was highly significant (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.87, P< 0.001).

There was a highly significant effect of a positive history of seizures on the CDR-SB towards abnormal over disease duration (history of seizures*disease duration: F = 18.66; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2 ).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05(*) or highly significant at P < 0.001 (**).

Statistical significance is reported by the P -value of the statistical test procedures and was assessed as significant (* P < 0.05), strongly significant (** P < 0.01) or highly significant (*** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001).

We found no significant increase in fat mass (SMD 0.24; 95% CI − 0.19 to 0.66; P = 0.272), likely because of the overall short period of observation (mean 6 months; range 1–6), which probably did not allow the detection of substantial changes, with highly significant heterogeneity between studies ( I 2 = 81.97; P = 0.001).

This was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating that larger values of the three parameters are significantly associated with SMR.