“highly significant”

A highly significant association ( P < 0.001) of stress with religion and residential area (whether urban non-slum, slum, or rural) was observed.

Similarly, the main effect within subjects was highly significant, and the effect size was very large ( M = 7.028, SD = 1.427) ( M = 1.680, SD = 1.877), F (1, 89) = 441.459, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.832 (see Figure 2 ).

Intergroup differences were hierarchically interpreted as follows: p < 0.05, significant; p < 0.01, highly significant; p < 0.001, extremely significant. 3.

The time × hippocampal volume interaction was confirmed as highly significant by likelihood ratio test (LR = 3712.99, p < 0.001).

Correlations between beta power and the simultaneously measured absolute force rate (see Methods section on Correlation between beta power and force ) were highly significant at the group level (ON: mean rho = −0.06, p < 0.001, t 17 = −4.7; OFF: mean rho = −0.08, p = 0.009, t 10 = −3.3).

The higher dose (TQ, 10 mg/kg) produced a highly significant ( p < 0.001) reversal in the number of flinches and duration of paw licking behavior in both the acute and delayed phase of the formalin test.

Conversely, all non‐T1c combinations demonstrated highly significant performance degradation ( P < .001), corresponding to their substantial median differences of −0.171 to −0.199.

T-test showed that Cohen’s d is 0.341, which exceeds the level of 0.2 and is highly significant ( t = 7.136, two-sided p < 0.001).

A G ‐test of independence showed that the relationship between allele frequency a size was highly significant ( G 1,3 = 51.5, p < .001).

In contrast, a highly significant (p < 0.001) increase in the expression of the copia LTR-CAT constructs was observed in male larvae mutant for the recessive (hemizygous) X-linked mof 1 allele ( males absent on first ) (Table 5 ).

In the WHI Estrogen + Progestin Trial, use of CEE + MPA led to a 26% increase in breast cancer risk (38 vs 30 cases per 10,000 person-years) which was highly significant in the weighted analysis (P < 0.001) [ 121 ].

Consistent with these quadratic findings, data from 2011 to 2014 showed a highly significant decrease in WEMWBS scores for 16–24 years old ( β coefficient = −0.46, p = 0.001).

This highly significant constant ( p < 0.001) reinforces the robustness of the model in predicting MetS status. 4.

This relationship was highly significant (z = 4.64, p < 0.001), with a confidence interval from 0.29 to 0.73.

A highly significant increase in bone density in the C + BMP group ( P ≤ 0.001) and significant increase in bone density in the C group ( P ≤ 0.05) was seen from baseline to 3 months and 6 months.

p <0.05 is considered significant; p <0.01 is considered highly significant; and p <0.001 is considered extremely significant.

In cases where the value exceeded 11.35, the significance was considered more robust ( p < 0.01), and above 16.27, the association between the cluster and the terms was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant difference, with a strong effect size ( p < 0.001; d = −1.125) was found in the ALR‐RSI between the subgroup of 15 patients who returned to sport, regardless of the level of play and the 39 who did not: 60.3 (±13.8%) versus 40.3 (±21%), respectively.

However, serum from mice that were infected with chimeric viruses ΔDomA and ΔDomB did have a highly significant difference in variances (F test p<0.001) in neutralizing titers against SFV, indicating that both domains A and B are important for developing consistent neutralizing antibody responses.

A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the effects of genotypes were highly significant ( P < 0.001) among most of the phenotypic traits, except root average diameter (RAD) showed a weak significant difference ( P < 0.05) (Table 1 ).

According to ROC-analysis, ASP after 12 months showed a highly significant AUC of 0.94 (p <0.001) to differentiate between the two response groups.

Because coextinctions target different phylogenetic and functional groups and given the fact that we observe a highly significant phylogenetic signal across all functional traits ( P < 0.001 in all cases), one could conclude that the functional dendrogram ( Fig. 4B ) merely depicts phylogenetic relationships ( Fig. 4A ).

Results indicated highly significant loadings, and a small correlation between the two factors ( r g = .10, SE = .03, p < .001).

( p < 0.05: significant; p < 0.01: highly significant; p < 0.001: extremely significant).

Notably, the changes in trans - β -carotene were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the 9- cis -isoform and 13- cis - β -carotene were observed after the intervention but not at baseline.