“highly significant”

Correlations of miRNA-33a and miR-122 with BMI were positively highly significant ( r = 0.823 and 0.965 and p < 0.001).

Despite this conservative approach, the difference between treatments was highly significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, p <0.001; Figure 4 ).

In terms of the number of capillaries identified, a highly significant difference (P<0.001) between patients with mechanical or inflammatory pathology and those with tumor pathology was found.

3.1 Retrospective analysis The GOF test was highly significant (χ 2 = 166.60, df = 46, p < .001), and both transience and trap dependence were also highly significant (χ 2 = 73.30, df = 7, p < .001 and χ 2 = 30.31, df = 6, p < .001, respectively), suggesting strong capture heterogeneity (Pradel et al., 2005 ).

At a confidence interval of 95%, the test was considered “highly significant” if it yielded p < 0.001. p-value ≤ 0.05 is taken as 'significant'.

After adjusting for differences in baseline data, the addition of benzylpenicillin was independently associated with a highly significant reduction in the incidence of surgically revised SWI (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.23–0.56, p <0.001), Table III .

Respectively Group B and E are the highly significant values in this investigation ( P <0.001).

Ascophyllum nodosum exerts a highly significant negative effect on RKN (Hedges d = -0.362, CI = (-0.515 - -0.21) P < 0.001, n = 65).

Overall models were highly significant ( p < .001) and indicated individual responses on included SWA indexes generated overall classification accuracy rates that exceeded chance levels, particularly for the identification of arthritis subgroup membership (see Table 4 ).

Robust ANOVA on the relative SUV mean changes showed highly significant differences between regions ( p < 0.001).

There were highly significant differences in associated actions according to occupation ( p < 0.001) (see Table 3 ).

However, patient-related burnout was the only factor found with a highly significant association to engagement in unethical behaviors ( P -value < 0.001).

The group difference on BDI scores was highly significant, Oneway F (1, 113) = 246.95, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.686.

The primary endpoint occurred in 6.8% of patients treated with colchicine and in 9.6% of patients treated with placebo, representing a highly significant relative reduction of 31% (hazard ratio 0.69, CI 0.57–0.83; P < 0.001).

These associations were highly significant (adonis2 p < 0.001, species-level microbiome, 999 perm, min. 5 animals per host group, Table S3 ).

These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001), also in the case of the global score.

This effect was highly significant (chi-square test, χ 2 (2, n = 156–337) = 21.05–157.36, P < 0.001 for postoperative days 1, 3 and 7 on the ipsilateral side and χ 2 (2, n = 143–330) = 41.99–157.87, P < 0.001 for postoperative days 1, 3 and 7 on the contralateral side) and lasted until the postoperative day 7 on both the operated and unoperated sides.

Higher amounts of TILs were significantly correlated with female gender ( p = 0.002), less L1 ( p = 0.001), and less V1 ( p = 0.001) and correlated highly significant with lower pT ( p < 0.001), pN ( p < 0.001), and M stages ( p < 0.001), as well as nonmucinous (NOS) CC ( p < 0.001) and lower TNM stages ( p < 0.001).

The residual analysis was highly significant for the initial conditions ( r 2 = 0.638, n = 14, p < 0.001).

Nevertheless, the performance differences observed for the different taper types are generally highly significant ( p < 0.001) and unlikely to have occurred by chance.

These types of errors were highly significant (P < 0.001) with handwritten prescriptions compared with computerized, however, there was a few percent of computerized prescriptions that showed absent basic data.

Participants in the obese group had highly significant ( p < 0.001) increased BMI compared to participants with T2DM.

Finally, the distribution of the mean MIs among survivors and those who died revealed a highly significant difference by the Kruskal–Wallis test (H = 6351.263; GL = 1; p-value < 0.001) (Fig. 5 ).

Results and discussion We found that the effect of stretch was highly significant for ACE2 (p < 0.001) within both the Cnt and CSE groups ( Fig. 1 A).

This was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) reduction based on a pair-wise comparison.