“highly significant”

In fact, the 3‐microRNA signature was consistently deregulated in a meta‐analysis performed on 15 different human and mouse datasets and revealed a highly significant pooled effect ( z = 5.33, P < 0.001) and standardized mean difference of 1.44 [lower interval: 0.91, upper interval: 1.98] (Fig 5I ).

The effect of recall accuracy was highly significant and in the expected direction ( F (1,283) = 27.88; p < .001; M major triads = 0.65; SD major triads = 0.33; M arbitrary trichords = 0.45; SD arbitrary trichords = 0.30).

From the neonatal aspect, there was a highly significant difference between all groups regarding birth weight ( P < 0.001).

The AMOVA analysis on the 29 accessions ( Table 2 ) prior to grouping revealed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) differentiation among the accessions accounting for 5.4% of the total variation.

We found a highly significant negative effect of timing (β = -0.206; 95% confidence interval = [-0.213,-0.199]; t (58478) = -55.88; p < 0.001), with a smaller random effect of image identity (β = 0.101; CI = [0.093, 0.109]).

Hemolytic activity of OS revealed a highly significant drop when fold dilution was greater than or equal to 32 ( P < 0.001).

The correlation without these points dramatically increased to a highly significant, moderately positive level also in the abdominal region (r s = 0.58, p = 0.001).

However, the relationship between the region and the secondary footing component was highly significant ( χ 2 = 85.4, P -value < 0.001, n = 324, df = 36) ( Figure 6 ).

A highly significant difference was found in the level of PLIN3 between the HL group and the OD group at p < 0.001.

P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant, and P < 0.0001 was considered extremely highly significant.

In an exploratory fashion, we simplified the model by removing the random slope and found that the comparison between accuracies for consistent and inconsistent materials was statistically highly significant, ß = 0.396, SE = 0.0968, z ratio = 4.086, p < 0.001, whereas there was still no consistency effect for scrambled materials ( p = 0.231).

Therefore, CRP can be used as a measure of the acute stage of infection, and our test results showed that the difference between the viral diarrhea and healthy control groups was highly significant (P<0.001).

Factorial analysis of variance testing showed highly significant (p < 0.001) effects for all 3 factors, that is (1) YMRS 4 item core score (2) gender as well as (3) the combination of YMRS 4 item core score and gender.

The pairwise comparison revealed a highly significant drop in the incidence of VT from 85.7% in the 0.05–0.20 mg/kg group to only 18.2% in the 0.60 mg/kg group ( χ 2 = 11.313, p = 0.001).

Overall, the gender difference in competition in the opt-in condition was highly significant: M d = .46, Z = 5.35, and P < .001.

Regarding one-way ANOVA, the general effect was very highly significant between groups ( P < 0.001) ( Table 1 ) throughout the experiment.

A highly significant interaction Mask x Inversion [ F (1, 29) = 24.92, MSE = 0.020, p < 0.001] revealed that the inversion effect was larger in the unmasked [ t (29) = 15.28, p < 0.001] than in the masked [ t (29) = 10.26, p < 0.001] condition, a result that is in accordance with the holistic prediction.

Pseudo- P values were calculated as the proportion of simulated bootstrapped datasets; only highly significant positive correlations were used to infer the network (SparCC correlation of >0.6 and P values of <0.001).

K t and D h showed highly significant positive relationships ( R 2 = 0.87, P < 0.001), with a single slope and intercept across the three growth forms, but lianas showed a shift towards higher values for both traits ( P < 0.001).

Our analysis of the PDFs revealed that the probability of wildfire occurrence has a strong, highly significant positive relationship with daily temperature during both June to July and August to September summer intervals ( P < 0.001; Figs. 2C and 3C ).

Under drought-stressed conditions, the ANOVA revealed significant (p<0.05) difference among genotypes for plant height (cm), SCMR, specific leaf area (cm 2 g -1 ) and shelling percentage, and highly significant differences(p<0.001) for days to 50% flowering, number of primary branches, leaf relative water content, haulm weight (g plant -1 ), hundred seed weight (g), pod weight (g plant -1 ), total biomass weight (g plant -1 ) and harvest index (%).

Our results revealed that there were highly significant ( p <0.001) increase in serum CRP and whole blood neutrophils percentage levels, significant ( p <005) increase in serum AST, ALT, urea, ferritin and whole blood WBCs levels and highly significant ( p <0.001) decrease in whole blood lymphocytes percentage in both moderate COVID-19 patients with and without GIT manifestations as compared with controls; while there is no significant ( p >005) change in these parameters when compared with each other.

A repeated-measures ANOVA with Singer (S1 and S2) and AOI (eyes, mouth) revealed a highly significant effect of Singer, F(1, 64) = 17.2, p < 0.001, as well as a marginal effect of AOI, F(1, 64) = 3.97, p = 0.05, but no significant interaction between the two, F(1, 64) = 1.69, p = 0.20.

The pharmacokinetic parameters revealed enhancement in oral bioavailability when FLT was delivered as niosomal formulation, confirmed with highly significant AUC 0–∞ with 2 folds increase of FLT-loaded niosomes (741.583 ± 33.557) compared with free FLT suspension (364.536 ± 45.215) that was significant with ( p -value < 0.001).

For HMW-GS, only the alleles at the Glu-B1 locus were associated with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in the SDSS test and significant differences in GPC (in four out of seven trials).