“highly significant”

We regarded p < 0.05 as significant, p < 0.01 as highly significant, and p < 0.001 as extremely highly significant.

When we re-estimated the model after excluding these 426 observations, the overall model fit improved slightly, but the magnitude and statistical significance of the estimated odds ratios changed only marginally compared with the full-sample model (for example, the odds ratio for female compared with male changed from 0.85 to 0.84, with both estimates remaining highly significant, p < .001).

However, VAS in each group was reduced with highly significant during the studied period when compared with basal values (SNCN Group = 6 (3–7) and DNCN Group = 6 (3–7), p ≤ 0.001).

Heart rate values were statistically highly significant lower in the labetalol group than magnesium sulfate group starting from intubation until 110 min after anesthesia induction ( p < 0.001), and both groups were comparable at baseline values ( p > 0.05) (Fig. 2 B).

In which in another study the effects of vaginal bleeding during first and second trimester on pregnancy outcomes was assessed and showed that association between second trimester vaginal bleeding and preterm labour was highly significant (p<0.001) ( 14 ).

A highly significant association was also observed between pain management strategy and side effects (p < 0.001).

This shift in decreased or increased PCaa species was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), as shown in Figure 1 C.

The convergent validity was very small, but there were highly significant positive correlations between the willingness and readiness to quit with integrated and intrinsic subscales (rs = 0.25–0.37, p < 0.001).

The results of the logistic regression ( Table 3 ) analysing differences in non-aggressive versus aggressive behavioural reactions reveal a highly significant reduction of displayed aggression by Argentine ants with pheromone concentrations of 1 μg/μl (Wald = 9.921; df = 1; P <0.001) and 100 μg/μl (Wald = 12.398; df = 1; P <0.001) compared to untreated controls.

Difference between two framework fabrication methods were highly significant ( P <.001); Gap of working model showed significantly smaller gap compare to impression in MG, CG, and AOTG.

Volunteers who chewed “honey leather” showed there were statistically highly significant reductions in mean plaque scores (0.99 reduced to 0.65; p=0.001) in the manuka honey group compared to the control group suggesting a potential therapeutic role of honey for gingivitis, periodontal disease (English et al., 2004), mouth ulcers, and other problems of oral health (Molan, 2001b).

Control experiments, where the co-location with triplets in the randomised RSs was studied showed that the 55 amino acid co-location to the entire codon triplets were statistically highly significant (p < 0.001, n = 7).

All five specific indirect effects of TO2 (and thus also SARS-CoV-2 infection) on HR-QoL were significant yielding highly significant total indirect (t = −5.03, p < 0.001) and total (t = −13.30, p < 0.001) effects.

In the COVID-19 sepsis cohort, recruitment became increasingly difficult, and univariable Cox proportional hazards models had already demonstrated a highly significant association between cfDNA levels and 30- and 180-day mortality ( p < 0.001); therefore, only 27 of the planned 60 patients were included.

The results showed that when FT4 concentrations were below 11.14 pmol/L, the negative correlation between FT4 and CAP was highly significant (P<0.001).

There was a highly significant correlation (r = 0.99, p<0.001) between the area under the NPF shift curve and the proportion of defocus component in the adapting images (e.g.: 1 for PD and 0.50 for 50S/50D).

For the expanded Center 2 external validation cohort ( n = 102), all models demonstrated highly significant improvements with the comprehensive vs targeted approach ( p < 0.001).

6 A) confirmed a highly significant main effect of concentration on cell viability (F (1, 60) = 187.05, p < 0.001) and a significant formulation–concentration interaction (F (5, 60) = 3.35, p = 0.0097), indicating non-parallel dose–response curves and justifying direct pairwise comparisons at each concentration.

13.8 ± 11.4 min; p 0.48) showed non-significant trends of time-saving for the very HPSD group with the expected highly significant reduction in ablation time (10.6 ± 4.5 min vs. 23.3 ± 9.6 min; p < 0.001).

Required cluster sizes for multiple comparison correction at these more stringent thresholds were estimated to be at least 197 voxels for significant (p<0.005) and 245 voxels for highly significant results (p<0.001).

eGFR and mean blood pressure were highly significant at the level of P < .001.

In the new analysis of the association between aperiodic-adjusted α power and performance in the Flanker task, the Flanker score showed a standardized β of 0.073, which was highly significant ( p = 0.001) while controlling for the effect of age.

The differences between free mimicry and muscle-control conditions were not significant, F (1, 43)<1, while differences between the free mimicry and blocked mimicry conditions, and between the muscle-control and blocked mimicry conditions were highly significant F (1, 42) = 24.59, p <.001, η 2 = 0.40, and F (1, 41) = 30.40, p <.001, η 2 = 0.43, respectively.

These impressions were confirmed statistically, with a correlation analysis of the predicted and observed performance yielding highly significant effects both for the first-person perspective condition, r = .95, p<.001, and the third-person perspective condition, r = .94, p<.001.

There were highly significant post-program improvements in knowledge as measured by the 25-item Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale, with an average 30% improvement (p < 0.001, effect size > 1.2).