“highly significant”

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test shows a highly significant difference between participation in each type of activity ( Z = −6.05, p < 0.001).

The H obs values differed significantly among breeds (1-way ANOVA), and all pairwise comparisons of H obs were also highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The mixed model analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of species and of treatment on T leaf ( Table 1 ; p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among the experimental groups ( p < 0.001).

In addition, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed between pneumonia-risk score and the expected survival, thus confirming pulmonary infections as a major cause of death in OLT recipients.

Correlations between the age-standardised incidence rate and smoking prevalence, teenage conception rates, and deprivation were highly significant at the PCT level ( p < 0.001).

Overall the choice for the trained stimuli is highly significant (t(13) = 11.103, p<0.001).

The RC versus SC comparison in Table 1 shows that the probability of correctly assigning a resistant or susceptible individual to the correct group is better than 98%; this value differs from random allocations (50:50) by a highly significant ( p < 0.001) margin.

The results showed that if dyads were employing this strategy purely, a highly significant interaction between social and perceptual factors would be expected, F (1, 31) = 34.16, p < .001, η G 2 > 0.03, in the opposite direction to that predicted by the optimal cue integration.

The mean reduction at 6 months follow up in the patients compared to baseline in the parameters like AST (50.31%), ALT (48.77%) and TG (59.71%) was highly significant ( p <0.001).

The 2-way interaction was highly significant ( F 1,242 = 18.7; P < 0.001); moreover a post hoc test showed that the response in the stereo-action-frontal condition was stronger in the dorsal part than in the ventral ( P < 0.001).

The effect of the compounds on membrane stabilization was also determined which showed that compounds 4APZ (120 and 240 mg/kg doses), 4APZAB (160 mg/kg) and 4APZVn (600 mg/kg) produced highly significant inhibition ( P < 0.001) of hypotonicity-induced haemolysis.

The ANOVA test showed highly significant differences in the efficacies of various groups ( P = 0.001).

As a result of the significance, the chi-square statistic was 27.977 with 1 degree of freedom, and highly significant, with p < 0.001.

Compared with normal weight men who did not smoke, the hazard ratios for groups defined by BMI and smoking status were large (1.31 to 4.74; table 6) and highly significant (P<0.001 to P=0.02) for all but two groups: moderately underweight non-smokers (0.92, 0.72 to 1.17, P=0.48) and extremely underweight non-smokers (1.24, 0.81 to 1.91).

However, further adjusting for BMI, resulted in significant difference between the two groups in the odds of hypertension, which was higher in HIV-infected individuals (P = 0.001, Fig 1 , model 3), and there was a trend towards higher odds of diabetes in HIV-infected individuals although the difference did not reach the nominal significance level (P = 0.112); the difference in the odds of dyslipidemia became more prominent while that of current smokers became less prominent (although still highly significant; P<0.001), as did for high SCORE (with the difference becoming marginally not significant; P = 0.105).

Time effects were highly significant for all traits ( p < 0.001), reflecting normal growth.

There was a highly significant group effect for EIM (F(12,130) = 44, p<0.001) and a similarly strongly significant group effect for CMAP (F (12,130) = 26, p<0.001) but a non-significant group effect for MUNE (F (12,130) = 0.31, p = 0.58,).

Although the a * values of the yogurt samples increased or decreased irregularly during storage, statistical analysis showed that the effect of storage time and dried kefir grain addition on the a * values was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

The correlation between the measurements obtained by two operators was highly significant in the right diaphragm TF (ICC 0.9, R 2 0.8, p < 0.001, coefficient of repeatability 2.6 % and 8 % respectively) as well as caudal displacement (ICC 0.9, R 2 0.9, p < 0.001, coefficient of repeatability 14.5 %).

Second, factors MBF (Multiband Factor) and FA (Flip Angle) both exhibit highly significant effects on all three metrics ( p < 0.001), highlighting the importance of slice accelerations and flip angles in determining data quality and processing outcomes.

There was a marginally significant [CO 2 ]×cultivar interaction ( P <0.1) for the sterility percentage, but the cultivar×year and [CO 2 ]×cultivar×year interactions were highly significant ( P <0.001 and P <0.01, respectively).

A highly significant association was observed in non-diabetics (p=0.001) while no significant association was observed in diabetic subjects (p=0.567).

Jss and Kp values for 5-FU-NE3-Gel were determined to be 12.0244 ± 1.12 μg/cm 2 /h and 1.2024 ± 0.073 μg × 10 –3 , respectively, which were also highly significant in comparison of 5-FU-S (P < 0.001).

Globally, the differences were highly significant (with KW = 37.00 and p < 0.001; Figure 1 ).