“highly significant”

Analysis of variance results showed that genotype and treatment interactions were highly significant ( P < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

Results are presented as mean ± S.E., with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 highly significant, and p < 0.001 very highly significant.

Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) levels in Serum The average serum levels of CA125 in control was 13.0±1.36 and in patients was 73.1±5.38 U/ml, there was a highly significant increase in CA125 in patients more than in the control group (P<0.001) ( Figure 1 ).

The results indicated a relatively strong positive correlation ( β = 0.317) that was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Indeed, the interaction between spermatogenesis temperature (sperm production) and offspring production temperature was highly significant ( β = 7.5, F 1,104 = 29.6, p<0.001), while the main effect of male treatment was not significant ( β = 0.7, F 1,104 = 1.1, p=0.290).

Measures of admissions per RN and the proportion of higher acuity patients were also highly significant (p<0.001).

Relative to saline-treated control mice, these reductions in FVII serum levels were highly significant (0.011 > P > 0.001).

A P -value > 0.05 was considered not significant, P < 0.05 was deemed significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

Chi-square analysis indicated a highly significant result with p < 0.001 (Table 5 , Figure 4 ).

The Pearson intraclass correlation coefficient reliabilities were high (0.897), and the correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

For fat content, highly significant differences were also detected in fat content among the cultivars (p value < 0.001).

The summary of between-subjects’ effects in Table 1 indicates that both Age and Instruction have a highly significant influence on rate of reading scores ( p < 0.001).

Participants were asked, “During the past week, how many times did you play an active sport, such as baseball, softball, basketball, soccer, swimming, or football?” We used χ 2 tests of association to test the relationship between intended sport participation and frequency of playing these sports at W1 and W2 and observed a highly significant association at both W1 (χ 2 = 1007.4, P < .001) and W2 (χ 2 = 696.2, P < .001).

The results demonstrate a highly significant overall effect for weight-age % category (Wald = 16.6, P = .001), age group (Wald = 30.38, P < .001), and ESI (Wald = 140.561, P < .001).

Results: Both TNM7 and PRSC showed highly significant prognostic impact ( p < 0.001 each).

When comparing subcutaneous suturing speed between consultants and trainees using conventional suture devices, there was a highly significant difference (median of 1.98 ± 0.79 cm/min vs. 1.45 ± 0.37 cm/min, p < 0.001, Fig. 2 c).

Results: The early MSAC group showed highly significant atrophy in the whole cerebellum and basal ganglia (putamen and pallidum) (p < 0.001), and significant atrophy in some regions of frontal, occipital and parietal lobes (p < 0.05).The late MSA-C group showed more atrophied regions in the same atrophied lobes of early MSA-C, and revealed more atrophied regions in limbic, occipital and temporal lobes.

As expected, a main effect of Disorder was highly significant ( F (1,54) = 86.99, p < 0.001; effect size, eta-squared η 2 = 0.62), with SZ patients being less accurate than TD controls.

The simplified model showed that the proximity of moga neighbours had a highly significant effect ( z = 9.267, P < 0.001): the rate of aggression by mogas directed to the intruder was much higher when there was a moga territory in the vicinity of the focal convict cichlid territory (Fig. 3 a).

RNA sequencing revealed a highly significant correlation of the transcriptomic profiles of the clinical tumor and the PDX ( r s = 0.916; P < 0.001; Fig. 1D ).

In line with these observations, two-way repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated highly significant effects of red light intensity at constant C i ( F (6,47)=321.93, P< 0.001), C i level ( F (6,36)=39.67, P <0.001) and their interaction ( F (36,282)=9.201, P< 0.001) on the response of g s .

The cohort*time interaction is highly significant (P<0.001).

For patients with a history of smoking, the median OS in the 3–4 cycles group was 27.9 months (95% CI: 19.4–36.3 months), whereas the 2 cycles group’s median OS was not reached, indicating a highly significant difference (P<0.001; Figure 6B ).

The interobserver reliability with Cronbach's alpha was highly significant with the P -value < 0.001 (Table 2 ).

7A ) but was highly significant when pH 3 gastric samples were derived from patients “on PPI” therapy (p = 0.001) (Fig. 7B ).