“highly significant”

After the completion of treatment with follow up result obtained in 08 patients of Group A ( Dhatri Avaleha ) i.e highly significant (p<0.001) in fatigue, significant (p<0.01) in abdominal pain and pallor, while insignificant (p>0.10) in joint pain, depression spleenomegaly, and irritable bowel syndrome.

A highly significant correlation was found between bone involvement and hepatic, splenic, and concurrent hepato-splenic disease ( p < 0.001).

Total chlamydospore formation in potentially malignant cases was highly significant ( P <0.001) in corn meal broth + 5% milk in comparison to serum milk [ Table 4 ].

The “do not shake a crying baby” program did not result in a decreased AHT incidence, whereas all three sham programs resulted in a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001) [ 15 , 16 ].

This new model showed a substantial increase in statistical significance, reaching a highly significant level ( p < 0.001) as indicated in Table S4 .

These differences were highly significant for both the raw (Kruskal–Wallis test, , p < 0.001) and the resampled data ( p < 0.001 for 100% of resamples with n = 55 per group; resampled mean ± s.e. for prinias = 0.651 ± 0.002 and for red-faced cisticolas = 0.382 ± 0.002).

The significance of associations between variables were as follows: in the metabolism of carbohydrates and in the transcription and translation, highly significant in both ( p -value < 0.001); in the biosynthesis of amino acids, not significant ( p -value > 0.05); and in the metabolism of energy, marginally significant ( p -value slightly greater than 0.05).

The results demonstrated a highly significant baseline difference in waterbird composition between the impact and control lakes (Treatment effect: F 1,14 = 8.071, p = 0.001), reflecting inherent habitat variations.

Cochran–Armitage testing verified a highly significant positive trend in target attainment (Z = 8.42, p < 0.001).

This difference was very significant overall (p<0.01) and highly significant for most time points (p<0.001), in both males and females.

A highly significant main effect of Time (F(1, 90) = 26.532, p < .001, ŋ p 2 = .371) showed a significant reduction in children’s acute cortisol after interventions.

Apoptosis (7 data points from 6 studies): Treatment induced a robust and highly significant increase in intratumoral apoptotic cell death ( pooled SMD = 3.537 , 95% CI 2.129 to 4.946, p < 0.001), representing a striking 34-fold geometric mean elevation.

However, the association was highly significant (p = 0.001) and remains significant after a Bonferroni correction (p = 0.018).

The overall model was highly significant (R 2 = 0.91; adjusted R 2 = 0.90; RMSE = 15.5 h; MSE = 240.25 h 2 ; MAE = 16.8 h; F = 118.3; p < 0.001).

Particularly, correlation for Pb in blood and teeth reprocessed by the log-linear regression model and after exclusions of outliers was highly significant ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001), as shown in Fig. 1 .

A full factorial ANCOVA of the residuals revealed a highly significant three-way interaction term between predator group, square of relative initial prey density and the predator-prey body mass ratio (F 7,344 = 26.41, p<0.001, r 2 = 0.35).

There was very good–excellent, and highly significant ( p < 0.001), agreement between blinded raters: intra‐class correlation coefficients = 0.97 for ‘total arm entries’, 0.87 for ‘spontaneous alternations’, and 0.81 for ‘spontaneous alternations as a function of maximum possible alternations’.

Differences are considered significant for P < 0.05, very significant for P < 0.01, and highly significant for P < 0.001.

After adjustment for age, BMI, smoking status, LVEF, obstructive lung disease, and neurological risk, the association remained highly significant (OR = 7.17, 95% CI [2.31–25.19], p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

The Shannon and Simpson indices peaked in the 100%SS group, with highly significant differences among all groups ( p < 0.001).

TEFS remained a highly significant independent predictor of OS (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 19.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.11–33.45; p < 0.001) ( Figure 6d ), providing a quantifiable, biology-informed metric for risk stratification.

Similarly, hip T-scores also showed a highly significant reduction in the OP group ( t = − 24.025, p < 0.001).

The average number of nominations was similar across the generations and by geographical area, but increased with higher socioeconomic status (2.9 for the highest, 2.3 for the lowest) and was greatest for women aged 45–54 years (3.0) and less at younger and older ages than this (e.g., 2.2 for ages 16–24; 1.9 for age 65 and older) (these differences are highly significant, P <0.001).

Accordingly, a highly significant difference was observed between the amount of energy imported and exported by birds during the study period (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001).

Lambda was found to be high and highly significant (λ > 0.6; p < 0.001) for all traits.