“highly significant”

In terms of how well the PHQ-9, and GAD-7 total scores were associated with the two criterion instruments, the correlations were all highly significant (p <.001).

The bladder and patient contour proved to be the most reliable contours based on the volumetric assessment; correlations between ABAS and the ‘as treated’ volumes were highly significant, correlation coefficients for the bladder exceeded 0.95 for all the atlas staples ( P < 0.001).

Across all 27 examples of the dapL genes, representing all major domains of the tree of life, the role of synonymous codon bias in altering the flexibility of the coding region was strong and highly significant ( r = 0.836, P < 0.001; Figure 6A ).

Interaction effects on leaf chlorophyll content Highly significant (p < 0.001) differences between P rates were recorded in chlorophyll content of plants.

A highly significant difference in fluorescence intensity ( p < 0.001) was detected in both PE (34:1) and PE (36:2) treated cell cultures as compared to the control group ( Figure 3 ). 2.5.

Three results were highly significant (p-value<0.001) but there nevertheless is a risk of Type I errors.

With a large sample size (n = 500), the p-value for the difference between the experimental and control groups was highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that meditation reduced anxiety.

Also, a highly significant difference (P < 0.001) could be observed between titres in Figs. 9A and 9B , last on day 14, and between all dilutions on day 35 ( Fig. 9B , P < 0.005).

The results showed a highly significant correlation between GPC3 expression and the histological subtype of breast cancer ( p = 0.001) ( Table 1 ).

We make note of this result even though it exceeds our 0.005 cutoff because the main effect for Asian individuals compared to White individuals was highly significant (AOR = 0.10, p < 0.001).

Infection resulted in a highly significant total indirect effect on the long COVID phenome (t = 8.92, p < 0.001).

Results Individually analysed samples compared to pooled samples Regression analysis of serum Se concentration of pooled samples compared to mean of the same five samples analysed individually resulted in a highly significant linear regression line (y = 0.9713x - 1.271, R 2 = 0.9745; p < 0.001; n = 135).

Both photoperiod (Type III Wald Test, X 2 = 4.835, Df = 1, p = 0.027) and ALAN (Type III Wald Test, X 2 = 9.637, Df = 1, p = 0.002) exhibited significant effects on glycogen level; and a highly significant joint effect was also measured (Type III Wald Test, X 2 = 12.222, Df = 1, p < 0.001).

Nonetheless, even with conservative adjustments, the findings would remain statistically significant as all main outcomes were highly significant ( P < .001).

A statistical analysis highlighted how not only the treatment and the time had a significant effect on the adult emergence, but also the interaction between these two sources of variability resulted as highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

Uptake of Applied Lolines The plant species and endophytes had a highly significant effect on the total number of aphids per tiller ( p < 0.001) pre-application of lolines.

In all cases, target transcript knockdowns had developed to highly significant levels by the end of this maintenance period (FheCatB: 0.09±0.02, P<0.001, n = 4; FheCatL: 0.18±0.08, P<0.001, n = 5; FheσGST: 0.18±0.06, P<0.001, n = 4; Figure 3B–D ).

Within-subjects effects: The effect of life epoch was highly significant (F(3, 261) = 23886.217, P < 0.001).

The difference in accumulation (C26∶0/C22∶0) was statistically highly significant in comparison with wild-type or Abcd2 -deficient or even with Abcd1 -deficient samples (p<0.001).

The Spearman correlation coefficient was highly significant between the dietary protein intake (g) and true protein ( r = 0.997; p < 0.001), and the protein intake (% kcal) and true protein in the HM ( r = 0.995; p < 0.001).

The correlation was highly significant (Spearman’s rho –0.906, p<0.001).

Pasture type had a highly significant effect on live-weight gain (s.e.d. = 0.08 kg d −1 ; P <0.001), which was just over 1 kg d −1 when grazing the lowland ryegrass sward, but less than 0.35 kg d −1 when grazing the hill sward ( Fig. 1 ).

Highly significant differences ( P <0.001) were found between gender and groups, but not for the interaction effect (gender × group; P >0.05) ( Table 1 ).

The found model, in Table 4 , was highly significant, χ 2 (12) = 177.623, p < .001, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.20.

We also found that the effects of consumers’ perceived pleasure on consumers’ purchase intentions were highly significant (β=0.795, p<0.001), thus supporting H8.