“highly significant”

Pseudo- P values were calculated as the proportion of simulated bootstrapped datasets; only highly significant positive correlations were used to infer the network (SparCC correlation of >0.6 and P values of <0.001).

To specifically explore those Parkinsonian motor symptoms that more directly affected performance in the motor learning task, we also applied a rmANOVA with the main factors DBS and Time to the rUES values, which revealed a highly significant interaction of both factors [ F (3,54) = 15.041, P < 0.001].

A highly significant interaction Mask x Inversion [ F (1, 29) = 24.92, MSE = 0.020, p < 0.001] revealed that the inversion effect was larger in the unmasked [ t (29) = 15.28, p < 0.001] than in the masked [ t (29) = 10.26, p < 0.001] condition, a result that is in accordance with the holistic prediction.

Regarding one-way ANOVA, the general effect was very highly significant between groups ( P < 0.001) ( Table 1 ) throughout the experiment.

In contrast, we examined a highly significant difference between SPT and OPT, comparing AVDG to CG ( p < 0.001) and AVDG to ADG ( p < 0.001), but not for ADG to CG ( p = 0.348).

This analysis revealed an overall highly significant effect of Measurement ( F (1, 45) = 26.04; p < 0.001).

Overall, the gender difference in competition in the opt-in condition was highly significant: M d = .46, Z = 5.35, and P < .001.

The pairwise comparison revealed a highly significant drop in the incidence of VT from 85.7% in the 0.05–0.20 mg/kg group to only 18.2% in the 0.60 mg/kg group ( χ 2 = 11.313, p = 0.001).

Factorial analysis of variance testing showed highly significant (p < 0.001) effects for all 3 factors, that is (1) YMRS 4 item core score (2) gender as well as (3) the combination of YMRS 4 item core score and gender.

For TMT_B, a highly significant group effect was observed (Wald Chi-square = 23.90, p ≤ 0.001, η 2 = 0.13).

Therefore, CRP can be used as a measure of the acute stage of infection, and our test results showed that the difference between the viral diarrhea and healthy control groups was highly significant (P<0.001).

Additionally, in Table 2 is highlighted that this biomarker exhibits an inverse correlation with p-selectin and VCAM, as evidenced by highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001 for p-selectin and p < 0.05 for VCAM).

One study showed that the use of the Hepcon device resulted in a highly significant reduction in the total protamine dose compared to ACT-based dosing (mean protamine dose: 14.190 IU vs 24.777 IU; P<0.001) and total blood loss (mean blood loss: 804 ml vs 1416 ml; P<0.001). 495 Davidsson et al. performed a study evaluating a statistical model, where the protamine dose was calculate

In an exploratory fashion, we simplified the model by removing the random slope and found that the comparison between accuracies for consistent and inconsistent materials was statistically highly significant, ß = 0.396, SE = 0.0968, z ratio = 4.086, p < 0.001, whereas there was still no consistency effect for scrambled materials ( p = 0.231).

P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant, and P < 0.0001 was considered extremely highly significant.

A highly significant difference was found in the level of PLIN3 between the HL group and the OD group at p < 0.001.

As shown in Figure 4 the most evident association was with the neutrophils, showing a highly significant correlation between mCRP and cd66b+ neutrophils (Spearman correlation 0.57, p<0.001).

In the mazes, the effect of the interaction between test and trial on the latency to enter the maze was highly significant ( X 2 (1) = 12.47, p < 0.001).

However, the relationship between the region and the secondary footing component was highly significant ( χ 2 = 85.4, P -value < 0.001, n = 324, df = 36) ( Figure 6 ).

Additionally, there were highly significant correlations between two values estimated by data average and data moving average (800-second data processing: amplitude r=1.000 [p<0.001], MESOR r=0.838 [p<0.001], acrophase r=1.000 [p<0.001]).

The correlation without these points dramatically increased to a highly significant, moderately positive level also in the abdominal region (r s = 0.58, p = 0.001).

Hemolytic activity of OS revealed a highly significant drop when fold dilution was greater than or equal to 32 ( P < 0.001).

We found a highly significant negative effect of timing (β = -0.206; 95% confidence interval = [-0.213,-0.199]; t (58478) = -55.88; p < 0.001), with a smaller random effect of image identity (β = 0.101; CI = [0.093, 0.109]).

The AMOVA analysis on the 29 accessions ( Table 2 ) prior to grouping revealed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) differentiation among the accessions accounting for 5.4% of the total variation.

All tests showed highly significant results ( p < 0.001) with a higher mean for the glioma average (λ = 0, Wilcoxon statistic = 6.40 × 10 5 , mean difference = 2.63; λ = 10, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.24 × 10 8 , mean difference = 2.15; λ = 20, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.85 × 10 8 , mean difference = 3.09; λ = 30, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.11 × 10 8 , mean difference = 4.04; λ = 40, Wilcoxon statistic = 9.73 × 10 7 , mean difference = 4.94; all λ pooled, Wilcoxon statistic = 1.37 × 10 8 , mean difference = 3.56).