“highly significant”

One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD revealed highly significant differences among cooked groups for all parameters ( p < 0.001).

The highly significant association (R = 0.75, P < 0.001) of the scores on assessments 2 weeks apart confirmed test-retest reliability.

The results showed a highly significant difference between the LA and HA groups ( t = −13.38, p < 0.001, n = 44), indicating that the algorithm was successful in accurately distinguishing between these two bursting patterns.

Notably, while age was significant in univariate analysis, it was not significant in the multivariate model ( p = 0.133), whereas mFI-5 remained highly significant ( p < 0.001). 4.

One-way ANOVA ( Table 3 ) showed that scanner type had a highly significant effect on trueness (F(2,27) = 11.39, p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 = 0.46), highlighting the strong influence of device choice on accuracy.

A one-way within-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the keyword scores showed a highly significant effect of condition on intelligibility, F (10, 210) = 40.651, p < .001, η 2 = 0.659 3 .

Sodium loss exhibited a positive and highly significant relationship with weight difference (T = 7.02; p -value < 0.001) and skin temperature (T = 7.07; p -value < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

Comparisons indicated that increases in children’s fear beliefs due to fear pairing were approaching borderline significance, F (1, 28) = 3.19, p = .085, r = .32, showing a medium-sized effect ( Cohen, 1988 , 1992 ), and decreases due to happy pairing were highly significant, F (1, 28) = 25.11, p < .001, r = .69.

Global PSQI scores were having a mean difference of 1.139 which is highly significant (p < 0.001).

On the other hand, the Pszczyna and Carpathian comparison showed a highly significant morphological divergence (F = 72.005, p < 0.001), with a large proportion of shape variation accounted for by the group (R2 = 0.71288).

The dependence of the k-value by temperature was described by the Arrhenius equation; the treatment had a highly significant effect on the Ea ( p < 0.001), with the control group having a lower Ea (24 ± 2 kJ mol −1 ) than the prototype group (46 ± 1 kJ mol −1 ).

While in the case of the Lp group at 4°C, the 10% maltodextrin°+°5% sucrose group shows highly significant survival ( P < 0.001) as compared to the control group with the Vsf value around 7.2.

2h ) and highly significant ( n = 45, r = −0.467, P = 0.001) at quadrat (cage) level ( Fig.

The total duration of motor block was longest in Group D (405.7±16 minutes) and Group N (257±13.4 minutes) and shortest in Group C (255.7±11 minutes), found to be statistically very highly significant (p<0.001) in Group D as compared to Group C and Group D as compared to Group N. while the mean values of duration of motor block were comparable in Group C and Group N, which were statistically not significant (p > 0.05; Table 2 ).

As shown in Figure 5 B, VP-AsA treatment significantly inhibited POD activity, particularly during early storage (days 6 and 9), where the difference from CK was highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.5.

This result is further visualized in Figure 7 , where an overall highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive correlation ( R 2 = 0.96) between both methods measuring transcript expression was found.

Strong associations were found between each of the three composite symptom scores and each of the three seizure measures, with the regression coefficient on symptom score highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) in all nine comparisons.

The regression coefficient was highly significant (value = 0.1378, p < 0.001), showing a clear linear relationship between fruit size and body size ( Fig. 11 ).

The combination of moderate inter-rater agreement with highly significant group-level performance (mean accuracy 76.12%, p = 0.001) indicates that discriminative information is objectively present in the sonifications (as validated in Section 3.4 ) and perceptually accessible to human listeners, but that exploiting this information requires perceptual acuity that varies across individuals.

Results obtained for alloy samples were very highly significant ( p < 0.001).

16 ± 2.82, P < 0.001 highly significant [HS]) with more number of complications (5.85 ± 1.65 vs. 3.7 ± 1.31, P < 0.001 HS).

In case of female diabetics the difference of BMI was observed highly significant compared to non-diabetic ( P < 0.001).

19 , 25 , 27 , 37 , 43 Tissue p53 expression and serum p53 antibodies among healthy individuals and cases A highly significant difference ( p = 0.001) in p53 tissue immunoreactivity was observed between healthy individuals and OPMD cases ( Table 1 ).

Correlations of r s ≥ |0.26| were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Discussion Reporting and experimental parameters We found a highly significant relationship between the concentration of TMZ used, the duration of treatment and the measured effect of TMZ on the viability of U-87 MG cells (p<0.001).