We found a highly significant correlation between SpHb and LabHb, as indicated by the Pearson Correlation coefficient (r = 0.978, p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 3 .
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The reduction in the level of modifications of the different sites on the U snRNAs (based on three independent biological replicates) was highly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Supplementary Figure S4A-D ).
Age Differences Between Diagnostic Groups Age differed markedly across the four main diagnostic categories; the global comparison showed a highly significant difference in age between groups (Kruskal–Wallis H(3) = 45.0, p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
The dosimetric gains associated with spacer implantation were highly significant (p<0.001) for most variables.
Moreover, job position emerged as a highly significant factor affecting both job satisfaction and creativity ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively).
The repeated measures ANOVA indicated a highly significant improvement over time for all WHOQOL-BREF domains: physical health (F[1.861, 368.461] = 40.820, p = 0.001]); psychological health (F[1.845, 365.280] = 55.490, p = 0.001); social relationships (F[1.583, 313.462] = 25.189, p = 0.001) and environment (F[1.791, 354.709] = 40.902, p = 0.001).
A highly significant positive correlation was found between pre-op AFP and cumulative tumor size (p = 0.001).
At 1-month post-injection, the difference was highly significant (Z = 6.68, p < 0.001, location difference = 45).
Spearman correlation analysis between the mean DISCERN and GQS scores revealed a highly significant positive correlation between the two measures (ρ = 0.75, p < 0.001).
This shift in the steatosis grade is highly significant in our population ( p <0·001) ( Fig. 1 C). 3.2.
Specifically, baseline TG levels emerged as a highly significant determinant of effect size ( β = − 0.634, P < 0.001), explaining up to 87.22% of the variation between studies.
was considered not significant, ∗p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, ∗∗p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 was considered very extremely significant. 3.
The ANOVA indicated that the main effect of Conflict Adaptation was highly significant, F (1,52) = 11.70; p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.20.
Specifically, 90% of the total molecular variance was attributed to differences among accessions, whereas only 10% was explained by variation within accessions, with both components being highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Importantly, fluorescence quenching was significantly higher in −/− macrophages compared with +/+ macrophages, and, using a time-series analysis, the difference was highly significant at all time points ( P < 0.001).
The sEMG recording allowed highly significant discrimination between most of the emotional expressions (p < 0.001) but a few failed (p > 0.05).
The multiple regression model fit was highly significant (F=10.14, 9 df, p<0.001) with an adjusted r square of 0.373.
This difference between the two plasmid treatments was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) as determined by a paired Student's t test.
For Entamoeba spp., population density emerged as a highly significant predictor of infection (OR = 11.71, 95 % CI: 3.79–36.12, p < 0.001), indicating that deer in high-density populations had substantially higher odds of testing positive for infection.
Variability of seed morphological and biochemical traits The variation was highly significant among accessions for all the quantitative seed morphological traits ( p < 0.001).
In addition, a highly significant association (p-value<0.001) is found between education level or previous experience and whether people seek information about MRI safety.
A highly significant difference was found in mean plaque indices values among the three groups (p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ).
We observed a moderate and highly significant ( r = 0.55, p < 0.001) correlation of the PSS-14 score between t 1 and t 2 ; therefore, the mean value of the two time points was used for the statistical analysis.
The overall change in knowledge regarding causation was highly significant (χ 2 = 139.48, p < 0.001) with a large effect size (V = 0.440), suggesting a substantial improvement in understanding.
In domesticus individuals, the model predicts an increase in SC of 6.07 × 10 6 associated with the presence of the Y MUS , this effect being highly significant ( p < 0.001, table 1 ).