“highly significant”

Results: The regression model showed an adjusted R 2 of 33.5% with an estimated standard error of 5.75% and was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Both linear trends were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

However, metacognitive ability showed a highly significant correlation between the two different tasks ( r = 0.71, p < 0.001, Fig. 2 c), as did confidence level ( r = 0.70, p < 0.002, Fig. 2 c).

In a high proportion of cases overexpression of more than one oncogene product was observed (see Table II). three tumour grades, the test for trend in proportions was performed and the result was found to be highly significant (P<0.001).

In irradiated group, a highly significant ( P < 0.001) elevation in the enzyme level was observed.

There was a significant ( P < .01) relief of abdominal pain and highly significant ( P < .001) relief in all the other cardinal features of thalassemia in patients receiving Triphaladi Avaleha [ Table 2 ].

Highly significant: P < 0.001 Significant: P < 0.01 Insignificant: P > 0.05 Observations and Results Cardinal signs and symptoms In the present study, Avipaka, Tikta-amlodgara, Daha , and Shoola were found in all i.e., 100% of the patients and Chardi was observed in 20.24% of the patients.

Results Highly significant ( P < 0.001) results on Shwasakashtata were found in all the test drug groups except in Vasa Ghrita (2), which was only significant ( P < 0.05) [ Table 3 ].

In group A, the initial mean score was 1.40, which came down to 0.933 after treatment, exhibiting a statistically, highly significant improvement, with P < 0.001 and about 66.6% relief.

This difference was statistically highly significant ( P <.001).

The obtained results were interpreted as: nonsignificant: P >.05, significant: P <.01, and highly significant P <.001.

Overall, pretreatment with clopidogrel resulted in a highly significant reduction in cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke from randomization through 30 days (7.5% clopidogrel vs 12.0% placebo; adjusted OR, 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43–0.81; p=0.001; number needed to treat = 23).

The difference was considered nonsignificant if P > 0.05, significant if P < 0.05, and highly significant if P < 0.001.

The Friedman-ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference [ χ 2 (5) = 42.91; p < .001].

Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed a highly significant association between the risk classification and erectile dysfunction recovery ( P < 0.001).

After adjustment, the difference in age-adjusted telomere length between T2D patients and control subjects remained highly significant ( P < 0.001).

All other pairwise differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The differences were highly significant in the t-test; t = -4,67; p < 0,001.

tachinoides, these ratios were 1.60, 3.1 and 5 respectively ( Table 2 ), these differences being highly significant for the two latter pairs (P<0.001) but not for the first pair in both sexes.

Conversely, wild-type CaMK- CB1 +/+ mice showed normal sensitivity to the analgesic effect of THC ( p < 0.001; Figure 6 B), whereas the mutant littermates CaMK- CB1 −/− did not respond to the injection of the cannabinoid drug ( p > 0.05; Figure 6 B), as shown by a highly significant genotype × treatment interaction (F 1,36 = 17.9, p < 0.001; Figure 6 B).

Across the whole growing season and averaged over all leaves, there were highly significant ( P < 0.001) effects of shade in both seasons on overall rates of photosynthesis, with mean rates for the exposed vines ranging from 5.5 ± 0.2 to 6.4 ± 0.1 μmol (CO 2 ) m −2 s −1 in the two seasons, while comparable rates for the shaded vines were 3.3 ± 0.2 and 4.0 ± 0.1 μmol (CO 2 ) m −2 s −1 .

Stage II patients had OS of 72.7% with ≥12 nodes harvested and 58.3% with <12 nodes ( p = 0.124), and stage III patients had a 5-year OS of 61.5% and 55.6%, respectively ( p = 0.508). In stage III patients, the lymph node ratio (LNR) was highly significant for patient survival, and OS for LNR 1 (<0.25) was 83.3.5%, LNR 2 (0.25–0.50) 63.3%, LNR 3 (0.51–0.75) 18.8%, and LNR 4 (0.76–1) 18.2% (log-rank test p < 0.001).

0.10) but still highly significant (deviance difference 42.1 on 1 df, P<0.001).

The vascularized area in the CAMs treated with bFGF was about 35% higher than in those treated with PBS, the difference being highly significant ( P < 0.001; t -test, double-sided; Figure 4A and 4D ).

A highly significant correlation was observed between the manipulability ratings provided by the BOSS and the action index obtained in the present experiment, Pearon's r = 0.71, p<.001.