About 22.50% of patients led sedentary lifestyle as compared to 7.50% in controls, the difference being statistically highly significant ( P = 0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The difference in the mean time of rescue analgesia was statistically highly significant when Group A (gabapentin) was compared with Group C (placebo) (P value<0.001) and when Group B (pregabalin) was compared with Group C (placebo) (P value<0.001).
Results Chi-square test revealed significant ( p = 0.001*) and highly significant ( p < 0.001**) differences in diagnostic accuracy regarding the categories “staging” and “grading” in all compared groups when using the diagnostic algorithms (Table 4 ).
The prediction of the independent validation data set showed a good adjustment between the predicted NIR values and the visual scoring values, with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.963, which was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001), and a RPD of 3.677.
The infill pattern is also highly significant (F = 975.38, p < 0.001), confirming that the material’s internal structure directly affects its stress distribution and rigidity during three-point bending tests.
For all METTLs, d S was significantly greater than d N and all Z -tests for selection (i.e., HA: d N < d S ) were highly significant ( P value < 0.001) ( table 3 ).
However, age emerges as a highly significant predictor (X2 = 32.458, p < 0.001), with older individuals demonstrating a greater propensity for ITN usage.
The CD4 depletion remained highly significant in the duodenum of virally suppressed participants ( P < 0.001), but it was less pronounced in the colon and no longer reached statistical significance ( P = 0.1).
Test scores attained were regressed on the different levels of TBI and education status, indicating that these can predict cognitive impairment, which proved highly significant, R 2 =.57, F (3,46)=24, p= .001, 99% CI.
Regression analysis showed that the risk of BED had a highly significant positive association with WC, BSQ, and IA with the WC identified as the strongest predictor for risk of BED (β = 0.23, p < 0.001).
A highly significant heterogeneity across studies ( p < .001) and between-design consistency ( p = .19) were observed.
A highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed between the infected and non-infected renal allograft groups regarding the biopsy results for acute antibody-mediated rejection, acute interstitial nephritis, BK virus nephropathy, chronic antibody-mediated rejection, CMV nephropathy, and mixed rejection.
This difference was highly significant (p=0.001).
The association between low DSLNT concentrations in human milk and NEC was highly significant ( p < 0.001), corroborating the results that DSLNT reduces NEC-like symptoms and improves survival in neonatal rats ( 49 ).
In another longitudinal study, Kirchheiner et al 35 found global health status and physical and role functioning showed a highly significant decline during CT/RT treatment (P < 0.001) and declined further to near the baseline levels three months after end of treatment.
The variable “Open access” was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a positive coefficient of 0.786, suggesting that open-access studies are associated with higher R 0 values.
The increase in RFV and CBF was lower, but also highly significant versus baseline (at minute 6 of isometric exercise: RFV 10.5%±4.2%, CBF 8.3%±3.6%; P<0.001 each) indicating choroidal autoregulation.
In contrast, the difference between Asia and Western Europe was highly significant ( p < .001), with studies from Asia showing much higher VEGF concentrations.
Highly significant improvement ( P < 0.001) was observed in weakness, fatigue and muscle ache and the results were statistically significant ( P < 0.01) on all the other complaints such as puffiness over the face and eyelids, peripheral edema and dry coarse skin [ Table 4 ].
Thus, we observed weak enrichment of strain-specific variants at sex-biased CREs when considering the full eQTL regions, but found a highly significant, 2.5-fold enrichment within intra-TAD intervals (p<0.001 for intra-TAD interval variants vs p = 0.278 genome-wide).
Results: Statistically highly significant relief ( P < 0.001) was noted in headache, photophobia and phonophobia and statistically significant ( P < 0.05) relief was noted in vomiting, nausea and vertigo.
As stress HR was correlated with sex, adjusting for stress HR rendered the relationship between MBF and sex nonsignificant ( P = 0.12), whereas stress HR remained highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Cytotoxicity against 788T cells which express high levels of gp72 is highly significant (P <0.001 at all antibody concentrations), but T24 and C170 with low gp72 expression are unaffected. y n ar T A at A x- d T as as at ly 4, e iW at ie es iC re ee 80 - 60 - C.2 x~ 40 ** 0 0 0 - 20 - . . . . 20 I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 100000 MTX/MTX-HSA concn (ng ml -' MTX) Figure 4 Comparative titrations of MTX and MTX-HSA against osteogenic sarcoma 788T cells with or without bispecific antibody (10,tgmlh').
These findings are all statistically highly significant (p<0.001) Conclusion Given the high contagiousness of the virus and the emergence of several variants, the management of the COVID-19 pandemic has focused more on prevention through vaccination against the virus, but also on an early identification of patients likely to evolve unfavorably for a personalized management.
The model is as follows: Survival ~ sex + ( 1 | patRIL ) + ( 1 | RIL : vial ) + ( 1 | RIL : sex ) + ( 1 | group ) + ( 1 | set : group ) The fixed effect of sex was highly significant ( z = −8.0, P < 0.001).