“highly significant”

Differences were considered significant at the level ( P < 0.05) and highly significant at the level ( P < 0.001) 25 .

These two traits showed highly significant positive correlations with SG ( P < 0.001 ).

When considering multi-locus genotypes jointly for all feral populations, they had higher levels of genetic diversity than commercial varieties ( Table 3 ) which were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) except for observed heterozygosity ( p = 0.108 and p = 0.124 for the complete and the reduced data set, respectively); this pattern stayed the same when only considering populations (varieties) with at least four individuals (data not shown).

All experimental values were determined to be statistically significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.001.

By dividing the population in subgroups with ‘normal muscle status’ and ‘at risk of sarcopenia’ based on mean TMT cutoff values, we found also a moderate association in the normal muscle group (0.521, P < .001) but a highly significant strong correlation between SMA and TMT measurements in patients at risk of sarcopenia (0.678, P < .001).

In both groups, statistically highly significant (P > 0.001) improvement was found in the signs and symptoms of Ekakushtha .

naso (grouped according to the SAMOVA test) was highly significant (Φ ST = 0.91, P < 0.001), while the pairwise Φ ST values among the three major clusters varied from 0.83 to 0.92 ( Fig 3 , S3 Table ).

However, the difference in mean numbers of MTase fusion molecules in infected cells and cells that withstood the infection (6219 ± 326 and 4400 ± 178, respectively) was highly significant ( P < 0.001) and led to a shift of the MTase to REase ratio in productively infected cells to higher values compared to cells that withstood the infection (1.75 ± 0.123 versus 1.02 ± 0.04).

As with the outdoor concentrations, we found highly significant differences in between-days comparison using Kruskall-Wallis test (p<0.001) ( Fig 3 ).

Effect on adult production Chicken dung had a highly significant effect on adult emergence rate [ F (1,98) = 314.8624, P ≤ 0.001], where dung concentration and emergence rate were inversely related (Fig. 4 a).

Even though the difference between the mean inhibition zone diameter for the optimized CLT-MVG formulation and the mean inhibition zone diameter for the CLT solution was highly significant ( p < 0.001—Student’s paired t -test), a mean difference of only 5.55 mm is not relevant in practice, as long as all diameters are situated above 45 mm (min diameter = 47 mm, max diameter = 61 mm).

The fitted model, for which a difficulty level of “none” was set as the reference group, was highly significant ( χ 2 =45.3, p <0.001), and the results showed that (1) compared with knowledge pattern I, all the other patterns predicted less difficulty sleeping, which was significant for the very difficult group ( p =0.017) and nonsignificant for somewhat difficult; (2) compared with a deficient level of slee

In the AREDS category 3 and 4 participants, the odds ratio (OR) was highly significant for neovascular AMD (OR, 0.62; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.90; P = 0.001) but not significant for either central GA (OR, 0.75; 99% CI, 0.45–1.24; P = 0.13) or any GA (OR, 1.08; 99% CI, 0.70–1.65).

Statistical analysis showed significant differences between all groups with highly significant differences between 25 ng/ml GDF11 and all other GDF11 concentrations, including serum-free media without addition of GDF11 (p < 0.001).

The area percentage of the collagen fibers& optical density of TNF α Semiquantitative assessment of the AP of the collagen fibers and the OD of TNF-α immunoreaction mean values in MT-stained and TNF-α immunostained tongue sections displayed a very highly significant statistical difference between the groups ( P <0.001) by using a one-way ANOVA and LSD post-hoc test.

The MANOVA multivariate analysis used to define the significance of the analyzed characters, shows that Mw, Ml, Mm, Sw, Sl, l/w and CSa, are highly significant ( p < 0.001), while CSw, CVw and CV w/t are not very significant ( p < 0.05), and the characters CVt, CCSl and CS w/t are not significant.

Analysis of variance results showed that genotype and treatment interactions were highly significant ( P < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

However, when considering all 2700 implants, the association of corticalization with marginal bone loss is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

All the main effects were highly significant—Target ILD: F (4,160) = 587.6, p < .001; Precursor Condition: F (3,160) = 205.3, p < .001; Side: F (1,160) = 313.4, p < .001—as well as the interaction Target ILD vs.

Mutations in rrl gene for the NTM were highly significant with a p value of <0.001.

A Chi-squared test showed this difference was highly significant (χ 2 = 75.1307, p < .001).

For leisure episodes, the average duration is 30 minutes for women, and 37 minutes for men, with the difference being highly significant (p < 0.001).

Negative correlations between temperature and DO were highly significant (p < 0.001), and highly significant positive correlations was found between NH 4 + and DIN (p < 0.001, Fig. 7 ).

The main effect found by the frequentist statistical analysis was a highly significant difference between ADduction and ABduction gains [ F (1,38) = 350, p < 0.001]; the ADduction gains exceeded the ABduction gains (see Table 2 and Figure 5 ).

We observed highly significant positive correlation between LAS and GLS ( R = 0.804, P < 0.001), moderate positive correlation between LAS and GCS ( R = 0.760, P < 0.001), and moderate negative correlation between LAS and GRS ( R = −0.757, P < 0.001).