“highly significant”

This highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) remained stable even after 3 patients with extremely high numbers of previous syncopal events were removed from the analysis.

As summarized in Table 5 , the proposed method shows highly significant improvements on FECGSYN across all metrics ( P < .001).

Differences among the three groups were highly significant for age ( p < 0.001) and moderate for distress intensity ( p = 0.003).

3.2 Histogram analysis The comparison between patients and controls revealed no significant difference on the RH for mean FA ( p = 0.228), peak height ( p = 0.070) and peak location ( p = 0.064), while the LH comparison revealed a highly significant difference for all three histogram parameters with p < 0.001.

2A ) revealed a single and statistically highly significant effect for ventricular entry (p = 0.001).

This difference was still maintained at 28 dpc where a highly significant decrease (70%, P <0.001) was observed in the control group (12.73±0.99 μ V, n =6) in contrast to the hNRN1-treated group (21.63±0.45 μ V, n =6) ( Figure 8 ).

Results revealed a highly significant main effect of complexity ( F (1,29) = 32.41; p < 0.001; ƞ p 2 = 0.52) explained by higher saturation responses in the high-complexity condition (mean: 0.14) compared to the low-complexity condition (mean: 0.03; p < 0.001).

The mean SWE values demonstrated a highly significant progressive increase across the groups ( P < 0.001) ( Table 1 , Figure 1 ).

Significance Analysis As demonstrated in Table 4 , in both 1-month and 1-year mortality predictions, several key prognostic factors were identified as highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Results: The Spearman’s correlation coefficient between ARFI (0.795) and MBT (0.678) and the histological diagnosis of NASH was highly significant (p < 0.001).

Post-hoc tests confirmed that the differences between all obstacle positions were highly significant (all p < .001).

A highly significant correlation was observed between the percentage of tumor cells with MET gene copy number ≥3 and CEP7 copy number ≥3 (R 2 = 0.90, p <0.001) across two subtypes of PRCC.

Using the NIPS pain score of the OS-NPA as the golden standard, the result showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and inter-rater reliability for both single and average measures between the VB-NPA, with neonatal pain videos captured in a real-world NICU scenario, and OS-NPA, with a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001).

The group × time interactions (G × T) were highly significant ( p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.418) for alkanes, cycloalkanes, and most phthalates, indicating differential temporal accumulation patterns between the groups.

When covariates (age, education, sex) were included in the model, BCFT remained a highly significant predictor for all diagnostic groups ( p < 0.001).

Commentary on the results: Compared with the control group, the study group demonstrated a highly significant reduction in the likelihood of developing a higher grade of inflammatory infiltrate (β = -20.92; P < 0.001), indicating a strong protective effect of the therapeutic intervention.

We found no significant differences between the intervention group and the control group for IC6 and ProC3, nor for the ratio between IC6 and C6M, whereas for C6M, a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) was observed ( Figure 1 ).

Results : Highly significant correlations (p<0.001) of rLTL and ALM (r = 0.248), ALMBMI (r = 0.254), and LLM (r = 0.263) were found.

Independent-samples t -tests were conducted to compare experimental groups and the data are represented as mean ± standard deviation, P < 0.05 (*), indicating a significant difference; P < 0.01 (**), a highly significant difference; P < 0.001 (***), an extremely significant difference.

Statistical significance was defined as follows: P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, very highly significant; and P < 0.0001, extremely highly significant.

While the main effects on FCR of both NACOS and Xylanase were highly significant ( P < 0.001), a significant NACOS × Xylanase interaction was detected ( P < 0.001) in phase 2.

The −0.064 difference in the mean polarization was statistically highly significant ( t = −4.008, P < 0.001) with 31 degrees of freedom.

Inter-item correlation for each sub-scale was highly significant ( P < .001) (Tables S3–S5, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/MD/O397 ). 3.3.

During the post-relaxation period, the population genetic distance of HA in the three countries showed a highly significant increase compared to the pre-pandemic period (comparison between post-relaxation vs. pre-pandemic period, p < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant (χ2 test, p < 0.001).