“highly significant”

Clinical evidence demonstrates a highly significant positive correlation between the LF HRV component (a marker of sympathetic tone) and both IPSS (r = 0.9558, p < 0.001) and prostate volume (r = 0.9421, p < 0.001).

Highly significant negative and moderate correlations ( p < 0.001) were identified between paired right-sided facial asymmetries in the horizontal plane and paired left-sided facial asymmetries in the horizontal plane (ρ = −0.538), and a weak to moderate correlation between global right-sided and global left-sided facial asymmetries (ρ = −0.431) ( Table 15 ).

Additionally, a highly significant association between the country of practice and the specific type of AI tool utilized by healthcare professionals was observed ( p < 0.001).

After adjustment for multiple factors, margin width was a more highly significant predictor of IBTR ( P < .001).

The interesting point is that a highly significant difference in the prevalence of total bacterial isolates, total coliform, and E . coli between the three districts of Zagazig was found ( P value = 0.001, 0.004, and 0.06, resp.) with the least prevalence recorded in the 3rd district.

This decongestive effect was highly significant across all measured points ( p < 0.001).

This is highly significant (t = 4.80, 16df, p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA) confirmed that these differences between cycles were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating a pronounced loss of transport performance upon reuse.

Statistical analysis confirmed these findings: ANOVA showed highly significant differences among groups ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ], and post hoc tests revealed that Groups 3 and 4 were both significantly superior to Groups 1 and 2, while no significant difference was noted between Groups 1 and 2, or between Groups 3 and 4 [Tables 2 and 3 ].

Measurement of leaf greenness was to approximate total chlorophyll concentration, with a highly significant Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.67 ( P <0.001) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

This hypothesis was confirmed by the Pearson’s χ 2 test of independence and was found to be highly significant (χ 2 =85.2; P <0.001).

For the number of former goal crossings the multivariate statistical analyses revealed a highly significant interaction of TMZ‐treatment with living under ENR conditions ( P < 0.001, Fig. 2 b), suggesting that the positive effect of ENR on the number of former goal crossings to a significant degree relies on the presence of new hippocampal neurons.

The advertisement of plastic surgeons' work had a highly significant positive effect (B = 1.034, p < 0.001, Exp(B) = 2.812, 95%CI [1.656, 4.774]), suggesting that exposure to such advertisements increased the likelihood of considering facial cosmetic surgery nearly threefold.

It was statistically highly significant (p<0.001) (Figure 4 ).

The model for metabolic water production was highly significant ( F = 267.316, p < 0.001), with TEE showing a strong positive association with metabolic water production ( β = 1.030, p < 0.001).

Importantly, the distractor type by repetition interaction was highly significant [ F (4, 112) = 12.30, p < .001, η p 2 = .31].

FAI, IOTN-DHC and IOTN-AC scores showed highly significant correlation with PIDAQ scores, depicting strong convergent validity ( p < 0.001).

ANOVA analysis revealed that temperature exerted a highly significant effect on archaeal abundance (F = 45.32, p < 0.001); Fe 3+ concentration also had a significant influence (F = 18.67, p < 0.01), whereas the effect of NO 2 − was relatively weak and not statistically significant (F = 3.21, p > 0.05).

Enterobacter hormaechei exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with N (r = −0.88, p < 0.001), while Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella paramesenteroides showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative correlations with R, with correlation coefficients of −0.74 and −0.73, respectively. 4.

RESULTS Based on immunohistochemistry, the results showed very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in the expression of SHH protein in the cancerous specimens compared with that of the noncancerous oral mucosa.

The level of significance was set as P-value ≤ 0.05 considered significant (*), P-value ≤ 0.01 considered highly significant (**), P-value ≤ 0.001 (***) considered highly significant.

All reported reductions were highly significant (p<0.001) due to the forced modeling.

The statistical analysis showed highly significant models for all responses: F-values were 88.82, 98.35, 21.23, and 13.16 for PS, PDI, ZP, and EE%, respectively, with p < 0.001 in all cases, indicating that the chosen factors explain most of the variability in the responses.

In contrast, the observed reductions in mean dyspnea score of 24.41% and in mean fatigue score of 25.86% in the yoga group after the intervention were both highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The association between PSS score and monthly per capita income was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].