“highly significant”

Vitamin D had a highly significant negative correlation with SLEDAI ( r = −0.495, P < 0.001), SLICC ( r = −0.431, P < 0.05), and fatigue ( r = −0.436, P < 0.05).

All regression analyses were highly significant ( p ≤ 001).

CAPE‐V scores decreased from a pretreatment range of 20–58 (mean 34.46 ± 10.12; median 30) to a posttreatment range of 0–22 (mean 7.64 ± 4.76; median 6), representing a highly significant improvement (paired t ‐test: t (38) = 19.98, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ). pVHI‐10 scores decreased from a pretreatment range of 20–41 (mean 27.62 ± 4.45; median 26) to a posttreatment range of 2–12 (mean 6.54 ± 3.07; median 6) ( t (38) = 22.64, p < 0.001) (Table 3 ). 3.3 Associations Between Objective and Subjective Measures Pretreatment CAPE‐V scores showed significant associations with shimmer and MPT, whereas no significant associations were observed after treatment.

Volume-predicted PIC:POC has a highly significant relationship with measured PIC:POC (p < 0.001, F-statistic = 123 on 1 and 28 DF), and an excellent linear fit ( = 0.81).

Hence, treatment with VSV-GP provided a highly significant survival benefit ( P < 0.001, log-rank test).

The correlation among the mean δ 15 N signatures of these primary consumers and the remaining members of the communities was highly significant (p< 0.001, adjusted R 2 = 0.73) ( Fig 6 ).

A highly significant positive correlation ( P ≤ 0.001) between spike compactness and FHB was also evident in all the three environments.

We found that eovx and eovy were highly significant predictors of counts ( s ( eovy, eovx ), p < 0.001), as was year ( s ( year ), p = 0.002).

The other participants all showed a highly significant VWFA cluster on a single-subject level (FWE-corrected p < 0.001) and positive beta values when extracting the mean beta value for the “words versus checkerboards” contrast from a VWFA mask based on literature (see Methods section and Supplemental Material Sect. 1 for a description of the literature-based mask).

Freidman's repeated measures analysis of variance was applied to compare change in all indicators in both Group A and B, all of which turned out to be highly significant (all P<0.001).

Fisher’s exact tests confirmed highly significant contrasts for these variants (Man_R-S and Man_C-S, p < 0.001).

The t-test revealed a highly significant difference (t = 14.90, p < 0.001) with a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 4.71), indicating a considerable performance gap.

However, highly significant differences (P ≤ 0.001) were observed between irrigation regimes and both stages for all plant traits.

Results Effect of therapy on chief complaints Group A depicted highly significant ( P < 0.001) results in Aayasa , Glani , Daurbalya , Shoka , and Nidra and significant ( P < 0.05) results in Dhamani Jala Darshana , Kapolgatavasa , and Sthula Parva [ Table 1 ].

* P < 0.05 statistically significant; ** P < 0.01 highly significant; and *** P < 0.001 and **** P < 0.0001 extremely significant.

The Friedman test indicated a highly significant overall time effect (χ2 (2) = 43.46, p < 0.001), with a large within-subject effect size (Kendall’s W = 0.639).

Key indicators, including MAP , HR , and V mean , exhibited highly significant positive correlations between rest and breath-hold task states (all p < 0.001).

In this report, we observed a highly significant difference in N-HK concentration values ( p <0.001) between healthy women taking OP contraception and those without this hormonal treatment.

Ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, linezolid, meropenem, tigecycline, vancomycin, and tazocin were the IV antibiotics administered in the preceding 3 months and their correlation to the study group (MDRO) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) when comparing to the control group ( Table 3 ).

In the statistical analyses, differences were classed as significant (*) for values of P < 0.05, more significant (**) for values of P < 0.01, and highly significant (***) for values of P < 0.001.

The difference between objective and subjective assessments was highly significant ( P <0.001) for parents.

Furthermore when the third factor continuous light was included, the interaction between all three factors was highly significant for normalization with the selection of reference genes (p<0.001), ACT2 alone (p<0.05), but not significant when normalizing with EF1α alone ( S4 Table ).

Differences in mortality were highly significant ( P < .001).

Moreover, all item loadings were highly significant ( p < .001) and greater than .50, with most loadings greater than .70.

Moreover, glutaraldehyde‐impregnated polyurethane exhibited highly significant bactericidal activity ( P < 0.001), reducing bacterial numbers to below the detection limit (≥4 log).