“highly significant”

More importantly, the reduction in new vertebral fractures compared with control was highly significant and similar between the two doses (65% and 69% respectively, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).

Group membership was highly significant (F(2, 146) = 12.22, p < 0.001) and also remained so after the Benjaini and Yekutieli test ( p < 0.001).

The sex of the animal, location and agro-ecology were fitted as fixed effects in the model and had highly significant (p<0.001) effects for most body measurements.

However, the difference in k d was highly significant ( P < 0.001), supporting the idea that the loss in stability of the Tyr13Phe complex is due to the absence of the hydroxyl bond to Gln54, which would normally stabilize the stacking interaction at position 13, as well as help position the β2–β3 loop in the RNA loop ( 43 ).

Comprehensive Analysis of Rice Yield and Its Components, Growth Index, and Topsoil Properties The further linear regression analysis on a logarithmic scale showed that effective panicles ( Figure 5 a) had a highly significant positive effect on the yield ( p < 0.001) and the seed setting rate ( Figure 5 c) had a significant positive effect on the yield ( p < 0.05), while the filled grain number per panicle and 1000-grain weight ( Figure 5 b,d) had no significant effects on the yield ( p > 0.05).

In the statistical comparative analyses, all calculations yielded highly significant values ( p < 0.001), including (1) an ANOVA for all three needle types across all of the individual measurements; (2) Mann–Whitney U-tests for each needle type between out-of-plane and in-plane punctures (both with and without readjustment); and (3) Mann–Whitney U-tests between conditions with and without readjustment using either puncture technique (out-of-plane or in-plane punctures) for each needle type.

Both A1 and A2 treatments significantly outperformed the control (CK), with increases in aboveground biomass highly significant ( p < 0.001; Figure 2 a).

Also, a Spearman correlation between the number of empty responses collected at UFMG and the number of DKO/DKN/TOT responses collected at UFJF and UnB was highly significant ( r = 0.751, p < 0.001).

aequinoctialis , all measured morphological traits showed highly significant differences among genetic clusters ( p < 0.001).

(2021) [ 26 ], who reported a highly significant drop in triglycerides ( p < 0.001) with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis, and Crommen et al.

The difference in F1-score between the two loss functions is highly significant ( p < 0.001), demonstrating that the hybrid loss not only improves overall accuracy but also reduces variability across runs.

When analysing the most optimal time points, correlation was highly significant at 14.30 hours ( r s = 0·71, P < 0·001) and 22.00 hours ( r s = 0·74, P < 0·001).

According to the post-hoc analysis, the difference between the latency values of the first and eighth decades is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

5 d), and the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

After incubation in the field, there was a highly significant effect of site ( F = 28, df = 1,32, P < 0.001; Appendix S1 : Table S2) and species of litter ( F = 26, df = 1,32, P < 0.001; Appendix S1 : Table S2) on the mass of carbohydrates remaining in litter, whereby this mass was lower in litter decomposing in forest plots and B. pubescens contained higher amounts of carbohydrates than E. nigrum , respectively (Fig. 3 a).

In this case, Group remained a highly significant predictor of language (β = .39; t = 7.9, p < .001) and added 13.4% of variance to the final model (adj.

Differences in community composition are highly significant, as shown by both ANOSIM and PERMANOVA ( p < 0.001, Supporting Information Table S4 ), providing proof for a distinct succession of fungal communities.

At the maturity stage, except for the grain DM content, the difference between the ecotypes was highly significant (p < 0.001) for all the bromatological parameters analyzed for the three parts of the plants (grains, leaves, and stems) (Table 4 , Supplementary Tables 4 , 5 and 6 ).

The results show that for most dimensional parameters and occlusion levels, the differences were statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The ANOVA analysis revealed a predominant genetic contribution for the SI (47.16%), FL (43.48%), LP (40.46%), FS (36.32%), and FM (36.78%), with highly significant genotypic effects ( p < 0.001).

urban areas was highly significant (p < 0.001).

The association between age group and risk group was found to be highly significant ( p value<0.001).

For 1990–92, the p -value for the interaction between the three fixed effects was highly significant ( p < 0.001) suggesting that the deprivation inequalities in AMI incidence differed between age groups and that this relationship differed for men and women.

Gradient‐based depletion of proliferating HCC cells was thus highly significant for both HepG2 and Huh‐7 cell cultures ( P < .001, Figure 3 A,B).

However, this was as hypothesis generating study and many correlations such as arterial glucose versus PRx55-15 were highly significant ( p value = 0.001).