There was a highly significant treatment effect ( P < 0.001) with an average% net calcification for favorable conditions of 0.023 ± 0.009% d −1 and net dissolution of −0.010 ± 0.014% d -1 for unfavorable conditions.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
All observed data was statically analyzed at a 95% confidence level using ANOVA, and individual group was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) for each treatment (different alloy compositions) at different time intervals (days).
KMO returned a value of 0.799 and the approximate χ 2 from Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting that the data collected were suitable for factor analysis [ 33 ].
Results ∆CH and ∆CRF = −0.78 ± 1.56 and −0.72 ± 2.15, respectively, and a highly significant difference was found between each of the pre- and postoperative CH and CRF ( p < 0.001). 18 eyes had single EOM surgery, while 24 had multiple (2 or 3) EOM surgery; ∆CH in the single group = −1.28 ± 1.5, and ∆CH in the multiple group = 0.4 ± 1.49 ( p =0.07). 23 eyes had EOM weakening surgery, while 18 had combined weakening and strengthening EOM surgery: ∆CH in the weakening group = −1.24 ± 1.77 and ∆CH in combined group = −0.26 ± 1.07 ( p =0.04).
In the present study, there was a highly significant correlation between tumor size and COX-2 expression with a P value of <0.001.
These groupings were highly significant (p < .001) as shown in Tables 7 and 8 .
A highly significant difference was found for the age of admission between men and women (Chi-square with Yates correction, p<0.001).
The partial correlations were only slightly lower than the bivariate correlations (by a factor of 1.0 to 1.3), and all partial correlations were highly significant (all p < 0.001), suggesting that most of the effect of age on d ′ scores cannot be attributed to the correlation between age and absolute threshold.
After adjustment for cofounders, this association remained highly significant—although smaller—for the executive function tests, that is, the DSST (β=−0.193 (p<0.001)) and the TMT (A: β=−0.167 (p<0.001); B: β=−0.163 (p<0.001)) within individuals highly exposed to AC drugs (>3 years).
Dark adaptation had a highly significant effect on both CRAE and CRVE ( P =0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively), leading to increases in vessel diameters in both the fasting condition and during hyperglycemia ( Figure 1 ).
ANOVA tests demonstrated highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences in the percentage of total sales that were fruit and vegetables between the time periods relating to baseline, intervention A and intervention B (Table 1 ).
37 Yaman Agaoglu et al found that the differences in miRNA plasma levels between the healthy controls and the patients were highly significant for the miR-21 ( P <0.001) and -221 ( P <0.001) but not for the miR-141( P =0.23). 38 An analysis of 742 miRNAs using plasma-derived circulating microvesicles (cMVs) from 78 PCa patients and 28 healthy individuals identified differentially expressed miRNAs that included upregulation of miR-107, -130b, -141, -2110, -301a, -326, -331-3p, -432, -484, -574-3p, and -625 and downregulation of miR-181a-2.
The trend toward housing improvement was also expressed in the highly significant drop in houses having tarred-cardboard roofs, from 52.9% to 31.6% over 0–78 MPS (χ 2 = 40.5, df = 2, p < 0.001), which were replaced by corrugated metal-sheet roofs ( Table 2 ).
With respect to background cognitive performance, the language groups were equivalent on the Raven’s Matrices test of fluid intelligence [ F (1, 86) = 0.095, p = 0.76, η 2 = 0.001], digit span forward [ F (1, 86) = 0.87, p = 0.35, η 2 = 0.007] and backwards [ F (1, 86) = 0.05, p = 0.82, η 2 = 0.000] and although there was a highly significant main effect of SES ( p < 0.001 in all cases), there were no significant language group by SES interaction effects ( p = 0.76, η 2 = 0.001; p = 0.96, η 2 = 0.000; p = 0.16, η 2 = 0.019, respectively).
According to our study, there was highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in postoperative pain from 1 st , 3 rd , and 7 th day with piezotome when compared to conventional rotary instruments.
There was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in the ploidy of cells extracted from bees with two alleles per locus compared to bees with three alleles per locus ( Table 2 ).
The increase was significant in fish exposed to 500 μg L −1 ( P < 0.05) and highly significant in fish exposed to 2000 μg L −1 ( P < 0.001) as compared to the control.
The main effect of Group was highly significant, F (1,14) = 288,64; p < .001; η 2 = .95, due to the decrease in activity for those animals in the Paired as compared to those in the Unpaired Group.
These findings imply highly significant mediational processes in which age ( β = -0.034, p < .001), education ( β = -0.120, p < .001), self-rated health ( β = -0.035, p < .001), and comorbidities ( β = -0.026, p < .001) were negatively associated with baseline GFD through baseline LTA participation.
In agreement with our previous observations at the TET locus, genes that are significantly more expressed in 96hW show highly significant enrichment for 96hW intronic H3K27ac (1.75-fold enrichment; P -value <0.001), whereas those genes significantly more expressed in 96hQ are actually depleted for 96hQ intronic H3K27ac (2.06-fold depletion; P -value <0.001) ( Fig. 4 C).
The most abundant taxon in vaginal communities and health complications (preeclampsia, diabetes, oligohydramnios, or uncomplicated pregnancy) in gut and oral communities were highly significant sources of variation in gene family abundances based on RDA of the overall data (vagina: F = 14.97, P = 0.001; saliva: F = 11.20, P = 0.001; gut: F = 12.34, P = 0.001) ( Fig. 2 C,E,G), although the numbers of subjects with each of these complications were small.
While for cases over 50 years old, the respective familial risks were lower, 2.22, 2.12 and 8.33, but they were still highly significant ( P <0.001).
The rmANCOVA on HDRS Bech -scores revealed a highly significant day * status interaction (F = 37.238, p < 0.001).
A paired t -test showed that this difference was highly significant, t (19) = −4.94, p < .001, Cohen’s d = −1.11.
Interspecific discrimination by shape All pairwise interspecific comparisons of shape (of either eggs or operculum) were highly significant (permutation test, 1000 cycles, P < 0.001).