Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results ∆CH and ∆CRF = −0.78 ± 1.56 and −0.72 ± 2.15, respectively, and a highly significant difference was found between each of the pre- and postoperative CH and CRF ( p < 0.001). 18 eyes had single EOM surgery, while 24 had multiple (2 or 3) EOM surgery; ∆CH in the single group = −1.28 ± 1.5, and ∆CH in the multiple group = 0.4 ± 1.49 ( p =0.07). 23 eyes had EOM weakening surgery, while 18 had combined weakening and strengthening EOM surgery: ∆CH in the weakening group = −1.24 ± 1.77 and ∆CH in combined group = −0.26 ± 1.07 ( p =0.04).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The partial correlations were only slightly lower than the bivariate correlations (by a factor of 1.0 to 1.3), and all partial correlations were highly significant (all p < 0.001), suggesting that most of the effect of age on d ′ scores cannot be attributed to the correlation between age and absolute threshold.
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
37 Yaman Agaoglu et al found that the differences in miRNA plasma levels between the healthy controls and the patients were highly significant for the miR-21 ( P <0.001) and -221 ( P <0.001) but not for the miR-141( P =0.23). 38 An analysis of 742 miRNAs using plasma-derived circulating microvesicles (cMVs) from 78 PCa patients and 28 healthy individuals identified differentially expressed miRNAs that included upregulation of miR-107, -130b, -141, -2110, -301a, -326, -331-3p, -432, -484, -574-3p, and -625 and downregulation of miR-181a-2.
Role of exosomal small RNA in prostate cancer metastasis.
Cancer Manag Res · 2018 · PMC6167994
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
With respect to background cognitive performance, the language groups were equivalent on the Raven’s Matrices test of fluid intelligence [ F (1, 86) = 0.095, p = 0.76, η 2 = 0.001], digit span forward [ F (1, 86) = 0.87, p = 0.35, η 2 = 0.007] and backwards [ F (1, 86) = 0.05, p = 0.82, η 2 = 0.000] and although there was a highly significant main effect of SES ( p < 0.001 in all cases), there were no significant language group by SES interaction effects ( p = 0.76, η 2 = 0.001; p = 0.96, η 2 = 0.000; p = 0.16, η 2 = 0.019, respectively).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These findings imply highly significant mediational processes in which age ( β = -0.034, p < .001), education ( β = -0.120, p < .001), self-rated health ( β = -0.035, p < .001), and comorbidities ( β = -0.026, p < .001) were negatively associated with baseline GFD through baseline LTA participation.
highly significantP -value <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In agreement with our previous observations at the TET locus, genes that are significantly more expressed in 96hW show highly significant enrichment for 96hW intronic H3K27ac (1.75-fold enrichment; P -value <0.001), whereas those genes significantly more expressed in 96hQ are actually depleted for 96hQ intronic H3K27ac (2.06-fold depletion; P -value <0.001) ( Fig. 4 C).
highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The most abundant taxon in vaginal communities and health complications (preeclampsia, diabetes, oligohydramnios, or uncomplicated pregnancy) in gut and oral communities were highly significant sources of variation in gene family abundances based on RDA of the overall data (vagina: F = 14.97, P = 0.001; saliva: F = 11.20, P = 0.001; gut: F = 12.34, P = 0.001) ( Fig. 2 C,E,G), although the numbers of subjects with each of these complications were small.