“highly significant”

The construct validity of the index was further confirmed by highly significant correlations between each item and the full index (P < 0.001).

Two discriminant functions were obtained: the first function presented a lower Wilks’ lambda (value = 0.262), and the test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The association between the exposure to both parasites was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Subset analysis indicated that the increase of RNR treated by C-PEI was highly significant compared with the sham group (P<0.001), moderately significant compared with the 2 mL ethanol group (P=0.048), but not significant compared with the low PTX dose group (P=0.307).

Mostly strong and highly significant correlations were also detected between the RP % and size indexes (r > 0.5, p < 0.001).

The correlation study between the SSP and RBS total scores was highly significant (Rho = −0.80 ( p < 0.001)).

The levels of significance after the post hoc screening were specified as followed: not significant ( p > 0.05), significant ( p ≤ 0.05), very significant ( p ≤ 0.01), and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001). 3.

The following rules were adopted: p < 0.05—statistically significant relationship (marked *); p < 0.01—highly significant relationship (marked **); and p < 0.001—extremely significant relationship (marked as ***).

The contribution of year, genotype and their interaction to the date of budbreak were all highly significant ( p -value< 0.001).

The first Analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis revealed a highly significant effect of the osteogenic media for all osteogenic groups (2, 3, 4 and 7) versus the negative control group (group 1) with p ≤ 0.001, revealing a successful osteogenic differentiation.

The difference was highly significant ( F = 8.9; P < 0.001).

All the studied populations performed highly significant departure ( p < 0.001, p < 0.01, p < 0.05) from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium when considering all microsatellite loci.

In the overall study population with 123 patients, BFP amounted to 41.4% when determined with TANITA and 39.1% when assessed with the BIACORPUS device, a statistically highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

As shown in Table 2 , there were highly significant positive correlations between the SAA and CRP levels ( p < 0.001, r = 0.781); between the SAA level and WBC count ( p < 0.001, r = 0.393), between the HBP level and WBC count ( p < 0.001, r = 0.468), and between the HBP and D-dimer levels ( p < 0.001, r = 0.380).

The model had acceptable fit indices (Table 2 , 2ii ), and explained a relatively high proportion of total PTSD symptom variation (R 2 = 26%), which was due to the highly significant association between chronic stress load and PTSD symptoms (β = 0.51, p < 0.001) (see Supplementary Table S4 for further information on direct and indirect effects).

WN injections displayed no significant difference regarding the mean elasticity modulus (EM; 0.992 kPa) when compared to not injected controls (1.176 kPa; Figure 2 ), while WJ injections caused in one experiment a highly significant reduction of the cellular EM from 0.891 to 0.440 kPa ( p < 0.001, Figure 3 ) when compared to their corresponding controls.

Ibrutinib disrupts mitochondrial homeostasis by down-regulating atrial AKAP1 expression As GO and KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that differentially expressed proteins were primarily associated with mitochondrial structural and functional changes, we annotated highly significant mitochondria-related differentially expressed proteins (−(log 10 P ) > 3) in the volcano map.

Predictions of Variation in Incidence Rates Regression of log-transformed incidence data in positive municipalities against predicted probability of disease transmission showed a highly significant positive correlation (ln [incidence] = 3.43 + 1.51 x predicted probability, F 1,305 = 19.04, p < 0.001), indicating that the models also have some value in predicting transmission intensity.

This improvement was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating a notable enhancement in patients’ genital self-perception following PDO thread application.

The coadministration of FLZ (40 mg/kg) and Meth-Gin (200 mg/kg) substantially decreased the fungal load ( Figure 7A ), which was highly significant lower as compared to FLZ treatment alone (P<0.001).

In the U/S measurement at 120 min median ACSA values were 0.1 cm 2 and 0.8 cm 2 for intermittently and continuously fed neonates, respectively, and this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, n = 7) and provides compelling evidence that H 2 S causes a substantial Ca influx in type 1 cells.

Repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically highly significant effect of exposure on recognition rating, F (3.42,68.42) = 71.734, P < 0.001 (the sphericity assumption was not met, so Huynh-Feldt correction was applied).

We also found a highly significant effect of stimulus type on mean accuracy by comparing the reduced model with a random-intercept only model (χ 2 (1) = 23.34, P < 0.001; ΔAIC = 21.34), with shape stimuli decreasing accuracy by 0.146 ± 0.025 (standard error) compared to color stimuli.

For immediate recall, a test of the full model versus a model with intercept only was highly significant, χ 2 (63) = 175.79, p < .001.