“highly significant”

16 ± 2.82, P < 0.001 highly significant [HS]) with more number of complications (5.85 ± 1.65 vs. 3.7 ± 1.31, P < 0.001 HS).

Differences in Waist Circumference The univariate ANOVA showed a highly significant difference ( F 1,379 = 16.50, p < 0.001) between males and females in WC.

In case of female diabetics the difference of BMI was observed highly significant compared to non-diabetic ( P < 0.001).

Correlations of r s ≥ |0.26| were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Data harmonization Before data harmonization, ANCOVA results showed highly significant differences in MRI‐derived volumes among different INNI centers ( p ‐values <10 −3 for all structures except for NT2LV in the training/validation set and p ‐values <10 −2 for all structures except for NT2LV and NCaudmV in the test set).

However, in the same group all partial correlations of EVLW(I) and PaO 2 /FiO 2 were highly significant (p<0.001) and provided coefficients of partial correlation between −0.66 and −0.74.

Previous data analysis demonstrated highly significant changes between admission and discharge ( p < 0.001) on the variables administered in the program such as pain intensity, depression, catastrophizing, anxiety, stages of change and pain acceptance ( 27 ).

Regarding the blood count (CBC) parameters, there was a positive and highly significant correlation between HB and HT ( p < 0.001); HB and NR ( p < 0.001); and HT and RBC ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant decline in white blood cells (WBCs), international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT), platelets, and albumin levels ( p < 0.001) and an increase in hemoglobin (HB), bilirubin, creatinine, and AFP levels ( p < 0.001) were found in HCC patients.

The p-value is highly significant (p < .001).

The confidence level of study was proposed to be 95% hence p-value < 0.05 has been considered significant, p-value < 0.01 has been considered highly significant and p-value < 0.001 has been considered very highly significant.

Even fewer ADRs related to the anti-TNF therapy occurred in the intervention group after month 0, leading to a highly significant result favoring the intervention group (0.08 ± 0.10 vs 0.19 ± 0.19 [mean ± standard deviation] ADR/patient/month; P < .001; Figure 2B ).

Negative correlations between salinity and DO were highly significant (R = −0.273, p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ). 4.

Results were highly consistent with those of the chi-square analyses: participant commitment remained highly significant ( p < 0.001), frequent appointments remained significant ( p = 0.02), and language barriers showed borderline significance ( p = 0.05).

The chi-square difference is 1,097,469 with 15 degrees of freedom which is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A paired t-test demonstrated that the difference was highly significant (p<0.001), confirming substantial post-surgical improvement in acetabular alignment.

When compared to the control animals, the observations revealed that the MSG treatment increased the percentage of food intake significantly (p < 0.05) from the first week of treatment onward, and by week 2, the variation was highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).

A 2018 study of 104 patients with preeclampsia and 200 healthy controls identified a highly significant ( p < 0.001) association between the GSTM1 null genotype and the development of preeclampsia [ 68 ].

The estimated p-value was highly significant for this relationship (P = 0.001).

Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test produced a Z-value of −12.24, which is highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that this increase in pain severity from summer to winter is not due to random chance.

Accordingly they showed that a highly significant variation (p < 0.001) in analysis of all the evaluated orange fleshed sweet potato traits.

Group comparisons (excluding “Case study” and “Non-BB schools”) using the Pearson chi-square test of independence showed a highly significant difference in school participation on the basis of recruitment method, χ 2 (1, n = 732) = 127.870, p < .001, but no significant difference on the basis of area socioeconomic status.

The association between spiritual leadership and psychological capital is a strong, positive, and highly significant correlation (R-value = 0.63, P = 0.001).

Correlation between HbA1C, FBG, and lipid parameters: the results of our study showed a highly significant correlation between HbA1C, and FBG (r= 0.673, p≤ 0.001) ( Figure 1 ), TC (r=0.189, p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 2 ), and TG (r=0.243, p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 3 ).

Average performance time (t) Regarding the overall performance time, we found a highly significant difference between the glaucoma subgroups GCp, GPp, and GPf (p<0.001, Table 1 ).