“highly significant”

Results showed a highly significant time x covariate interaction ( F (1, 16) = 15.84, p =.001, η 2 p = 0.48), with post-hoc tests revealing a non-significant negative relation of post-surgical hospital stay and child depressive symptoms at T1 ( r T1 = − 0.18, n.s. ), and a moderate positive non-significant correlation at T2 ( r T2 = 0.36, n.s. ).

The corrected p ‐values are visualized in the heatmap of Figure 3 , where red illustrates a highly significant p ‐value ( p < 0.001), orange a significant p ‐value ( p < 0.05), and blue a nonsignificant p ‐value for each class pair (row) and feature (columns).

Finally, transcripts that exhibited highly significant differential expression (adjusted p < 0.001) and at least a four-fold (log 2 ) difference at the isoform level were extracted and clustered.

P<0.05 was considered significant, P<0.01 was considered highly significant, and P<0.001 was considered very highly significant.

Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant positive correlation between NLR and CPAR ( P < .001, r = 0.530).

For our primary outcomes measures, we found a highly significant difference in PCL-S scores between W1 and W7 for both the propranolol group [ t (28) = 5.683 p < 0.001] and the placebo group [ t (28) = 7.410 p < 0.001] (Fig. 2A ).

Testing the Segmentation Model Against Visual Rating Results The logistic regression between the number of DWM PVS clusters ( Figure 10A ) and the visual grading rating ( Figure 10B ) in the ENCOD set was highly significant for all 3 PredMap-Thrs (R 2 0.1 = 0.38, R 2 0.5 = 0.45 see Figure 10C , R 2 0.9 = 0.47, p < 0.001, N = 1,782).

The difference in the response to CSF1 based on genotype was highly significant (p < 0.001).

These difference were highly significant in all the aforementioned cases (p < 0.001).

Overall, complications occurred in 14.7% of women: 15% in block A, 21.0% in block B, 10.6% in block C, and 4% in block D, a highly significant decrease in complications over the years, especially in block D (the rates of complications in all block are compared with rate of complication in block D) ( P < 0.001).

Findings We observed a highly significant correlation between the predicted and measured proportions of V1/S and FCR3 alleles in mixed laboratory samples (all p < 0.001).

On the other hand, clinical parameters that were likely to be positively associated with inflammatory bone resorption in this group did result in higher PAI scores at a highly significant level ( P < 0.001): teeth with a pain history of more than one week and root filled teeth had higher PAI scores than teeth that had not been painful for this duration or were not root filled, respectively.

The difference between the two mode of applications was highly significant ( P < .001).

However, the difference between Finnhorses and mixed‐breed group was highly significant ( G = 32.773, p < .001), there were in general much more TT homozygotes (long‐distance runners) and less CC homozygotes (sprinters) in Finnhorses than in other breeds.

Surgical procedure was a highly significant predictor of cohort membership (Nagelkerke R square = 0.755, p < 0.001), as 27 of 33 (82%) patients in the higher average MME cohort underwent a PAO procedure.

A one-way ANOVA on these ratings disclosed a highly significant effect of emotion [ F (2, 34) = 39.94, p <.001, η p 2 = .701].

While regional disparities exist ( Figure 3A ), NOx exposure exhibited a highly significant positive association with mortality (β = 0.377 per 1-unit increase, P < 0.001, Figure 3B–E ); here, the unstandardized β coefficients represent the absolute change in deaths per 100,000 population (raw ASMR scale).

Mean comparisons of AgNPs (C) alone at 425 and 850 μg/mL were found statistically highly significant ( p -value<0.001).

Again, all differences between these levels of job security were statistically highly significant (permanent contract vs. 5-year contract: χ 2 = 184.15; p < .001; 5-year contract vs. 2-year contract: χ 2 = 80.54; p < .001).

The median overall survival in the individual prognostic group was very similar with the 2022 GPA being highly significant for overall survival (p < 0.001).

Based on these results, we retained three NTB variables (semantic fluency, immediate word list recall, and delayed word list recall) that were highly significant predictors (all p < .001) with excellent fit (Max‐rescaled R ‐square = 0.72, Hosmer–Lemeshow Goodness‐of‐fit (GOF) χ 2 = 8.25, p = .41; Max‐rescaled R‐square = 0.66, Hosmer–Lemeshow GOF χ 2 = 8.17, p = .41) for dementia and CI (dementia status and CIND status combined), respectively, within the ADAMS data.

Primary outcome Vertical skeletal measurements According to the analysis of the pre- and post-treatment 3D cephalometric measurements, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed in the angle between the mandibular and SN planes, which increased by a mean of 0.82 ± 1.37°.

4) We found highly significant differences for smoking-related VOCs such as acetonitrile, benzene and cyclohexadiene (p<0.001, respectively) between active smokers and non-smokers ( figure 1a ).

The SMART heart package was statistically highly significant for knowledge and practice at P < 0.001 level.

There was a highly significant difference found between study and control groups ( P < 0.001) for taking soy food products in a week.