“highly significant”

Although this looks like a modest difference in the figure, it is highly significant (p=0.0013, Kruskal-Wallis test).

This difference was also highly significant ( p = 0.0013).

Interestingly, whereas YCAY cluster scores correlated poorly with CLIP cDNA deletion counts (Spearman's rho = 0.25, P -value = 0.16), correlation with iCLIP cDNA counts was highly significant (Spearman's rho = 0.53, P -value = 0.0013) (Figure 4a-c ).

Based on a Post-hoc Tukey’s test, To-AE and To-AgNPs showed highly significant positive correlations with ascorbic acid, P = 0.0013 and P = 0.0007, respectively, and To-AgNPs showed a higher radical scavenging activity than To-AE ( Figure 9B ). 3.8.

Sub-group analysis in relation to gender revealed a highly significant influence of ERα expression on OS and RFS in males but not in females, both for the ERα-positive primary tumor cohort (males: p = 0.0013; p < 0.0001; females: p = 0.56; p = 0.89) and the ERα-positive primary tumor/primary lymph node metastasis cohort (males: p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001; females: p = 0.95; p = 0.96).

Statistical evaluation using an exact test for equality of Poisson rates under equal exposure confirmed that this enhancement is highly significant ( p = 0.0013).

The nonlinear components of log-transformed PCW in the human brain in both data sets were a highly significant predictor of normalized DMPK expression pattern in the human brain across both data sets— F (2,878.98) = 7.95, p = 0.0013; F (2,3.03) = 11.70, p = 6.21e −05 , respectively.

Student in-game performance demonstrated highly significant correlation relative to ABC-H (points: p = 0.0013; stars: p = 0.0013), and significant correlation to TRF ADHD scores (points: p = 0.012; stars: p = 0.012).

The effects of temperature on all four phenotypes were highly significant ( P = 0.0013 for survival to pupation; P <0.0001 for minimal pupation time, female pupal mass, and female eclosion time).

4a ), and combining both markers yielded a highly significant association with worse overall survival ( P = 0.0013) (Supplementary Fig. 4b, c ).

Changes were highly significant ( P = 0.0013 for the acute response, P = 0.0060 for the long-term response).

The difference between both groups (2.49, SE 0.76) was highly significant [confidence interval (CI) 0.99–3.98, p = 0.0013].

The antibacterial analysis in our study has yielded highly significant results in p -values against the Gram-negative bacterial strains E. coli ATCC ® 25922 ( p = 0.0013) and S. dysenteriae ( p = 0.0059), indicating the ability to cross the outer membranes, unlike CFS, to release ions.

However, while low and intermediate vaccine dose are associated to highly significant contraction at 6 months (Student t test for paired data w4/w24 L p = 0.0013, I p = 0.0008), it is not the case for high dose ( p = 0.0647), suggesting better persistence of neutralization activity with higher vaccine dose.

A two-way repeated ordinal regression analysis on the ordered Likert scores 26 indicated a highly significant change in the Likert score with time (p=0.0013) and non-significant changes between standards (p=0.23) (see online supplementary file 5 ).

Also, the mean values of the microbial populations for the samples collected at all three sites during the dry months generally exceeded those collected during the raining months, with highly significant differences for microbiological parameters such as HPC ( p = 0.0013), TC ( p = 0.0019), FC ( p = 0.0008) and A. hydrophila ( p = 0.0012).

The difference between these group percentages of success was statistically highly significant as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test ( p < 0.0013 for the three COPx threshold values).

This difference was highly significant [one-tailed t test: t (8) = 6.278, p = .0013].

Indeed, we found that potentiation of EPSP amplitudes increased by 166.0±8.9% for rats housed in conventional cages (n = 13; t = 45−50 min after TBP, p = 0.0001) and by 227.0±14.4% for rats raised in MarlauTM cages (n = 12; t = 45−50 min after TBP, p = 0.0001), the difference in LTP amplitude between the two groups of rats being highly significant (p = 0.0013).

There was a highly significant increase in students' commitment to including ‘R/S competent care’ in future practice (mean composite score pre 5.34, post 6.59, p=0.0013; table 3 , item 15), with a close to significant increase in those willing to suggest other physicians or students do the same (mean composite score pre 5.10, post 5.83, p = 0.055).

Finally, the malignancy value M was highly significant, with P = 0.0013 (table 2 ).

The different clinical groups on the other hand, were highly significant (p = 0.0013 for Bmi-1 and p = 0.013 for Mel-18).

The difference in biosecurity spending was highly significant ( p = 0.0013), while the difference in infection reveals was marginally significant ( p = 0.0487).

Paired sample t‐tests show that the SPE in the matching conditions is highly significant t (30) = 3.55, p = 0.0013 (mean difference = 198.6), but not in the nonmatching conditions ( t (30) = −1.173, p = 0.25, mean difference = −26.6). 3.1.2.

We found, as expected, that within-category decoding was highly significant within each subregion of V1 (right: 59%, t (7) = 4.55, P = .0013; left: 57%, t (7) = 5.23, P = 0.0006; pooled: 60%, t (7) = 5.07, P = 0.0007; chance = 33%).