“highly significant”

The gain in ridge width was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.0019).

Correlation analysis revealed highly significant positive linear relationships between the extent of an elephant’s entire range and their respective hot spots (Table 3 , r = 0.75, t = 3.97, df = 12, p = 0.0019), indicating that elephants with smaller entire range extents also have smaller sized hot spots.

7 d) was highly significant for Small Cell Lung Cancer ( p = 0.0019), PI3K-Akt signalling ( p = 0.0247), and transcriptional misregulation in Cancer ( p = 0.0073), pathways that contribute to glioma growth and movement.

This was a highly significant reduction in comparison to the beginning of treatment ( p = 0.0019).

There was also highly significant difference in the occurrence of hearing loss between those three groups (Pearson Chi-square, p = 0.00193).

We then tested the association of target genes belonging to these pathways with PD risk, and identified nine SNPs in USP37 consistently associated with PD susceptibility in three genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets (0.46≤OR≤0.63) and highly significant in the meta-dataset (3.36×10 −4 <p<1.94×10 −3 ).

In both cases the changes seen by each device (from 40 to 100 mmHg) were highly significant ( P = 0.001953 for both the NIRO and ISS), indicating once again that both devices clearly demonstrate the ability to detect the changes induced by the release of the hypoxia clamp.

A highly significant ( p = 0.002) difference of EMA expression depending on the latency of the first passage could be identified, with high EMA expression corresponding to an early passage in average after 7 days (range 5–10 days).

This model revealed a highly significant result explaining 50% of measured functional connectivity (R2 = 0.50; adjusted R2 = 0.42, F-value = 5.9; P = 0.002).

In fact, the rating differences for NH children's happy and sad utterances were highly significant, t (14) = −3.81, p = 0.002, and the same trend was evident for child CI, t (14) = −1.96, p = 0.07.

The results of the urinary creatinine measurement were very similar to the results of UcysC with enhanced age-dependent excretion in the Col8 -ko, which was also reflected in a highly significant genotype–age interaction ( p = 0.002) ( Figure 3 b).

Bat hunting was primarily a male activity and the association between gender and bat hunting was highly significant ( χ 2 test, p < 0.002).

In the 9-digit sequences it was, in contrast, slightly (not significantly; p = 0.093) larger in the control task, and the same effect was highly significant in the 13-digit sequences (p = 0.002).

Analyses on all participants combined ( Figure 1D ) showed a highly significant increase in relative mtDNAcn associated with benzene levels for both unadjusted (7.8% increase; 95% CI: 2.9, 13.0; p = 0.002) and adjusted regressions (10.3% increase; 95% CI: 5.4, 15.5; p < 0.001).

However, we found highly significant differences between age classes, such that juvenile snakes had higher reflectance than adults in all comparisons (all F > 10.77; p < 0.002; Fig. 3b, c , Supplementary Fig.

Furthermore, there was a highly significant positive association between CI activity and quantity (linear regression, B = 0.806, P = 0.002, Supplementary Table 12 ).

Fibrosis improvement was observed in 57% of norUDCA-treated vs 40% in placebo-treated ( P = 0.035), with highly significant adjusted mean ( P = 0.002). nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score at week 18 and 24 ( P = 0.041 and P = 0.032).

This list shows highly significant overlap with disease-associated DEGs ( p -value = 0.002, representation factor 2.5).

90 minutes of exposure to UV light resulted in a highly significant (p<0.002, n = 20) increase of gross O 2 production in the Ageladine A treatments vs. the controls (2.34 ± 0.38 and 0.92 ± 0.32% h -1 , respectively; Fig 1b ).

The correlations between placental perfusion fraction and ultrasound estimates and plasma markers were highly significant (P = 0.002 and P = 0.0001, respectively).

At DC discharge, 21.7% of non-shunt patients had an mRS ≤ 3 compared to none (0%) in the shunt cohort, showing a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002).

Comparing JNDs of single subject data before and after training shows that this categorical effect is highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank p = .002, T = 0, r = −.845, effect size W = .89).

Analysis of the first 15-min time-window only, the point at which morphine-induced locomotion was typically largest, revealed a highly significant drug × day interaction [F(3,18) = 7.35; p = 0.002], reflecting the widening difference between saline and drug days as conditioning progressed: activity increased across morphine days, but decreased across saline days.

However, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002) was observed in the Heidelberg score at 3 months in the success group (SG) compared to the failure group (FG).

Regression analyses confirmed highly significant upward trends in both mortality rate (β = +0.689 per 100,000/year; 95% CI: 0.326–1.052; p = 0.002; R 2 = 0.61) and death counts (β = +36.5 deaths/year; p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.67).