“highly significant”

A runs test ( Horn et al., 1984 ) shows that the grouping of channel activity is highly significant ( P < 0.002), even in this experiment where pulses were delivered at 5-s intervals.

When considering the overall miRNA expression ( miRNA Sum ), the difference between healthy controls and ccRCC patients remained highly significant (U = 452.5, Z = −3.157, p = 0.002), confirming a distinct urinary miRNA signature associated with ccRCC ( Table 2 ).

alburnus (linear regression; P>0.05), but was highly significant for A . fasciatus ( δ L 13 C = 0.348 L t − 23.4 , P = 0.002; δ L 15 N = 0.205 L t + 8.28 , P≤0.001) and L . grossidens ( δ L 13 C = 3.29 ln ( L t ) − 29.4 , P = 0.009).

There was a highly significant improvement in both groups (3.33 in the PRP group vs. 7.43 in the control group), with a significant difference in favor of the PRP group ( p = 0.002).

A further finding of our study is the highly significant correlation between nuclear YB-1 expression and negativity of the progesterone receptor status (p = 0.002), which has not been described so far.

Results On-MPH status was associated with a highly significant change (−29.9%) of striatal DAT BP as compared to off-MPH ( t = −4.12, p = 0.002).

The overall HER2 positivity rate for patients characterised as having a gastric site (proximal and distal stomach combined) was 79% and 21% for those with GEJ site, where the association was found to highly significant (P=0.002).

Importantly, for MTs, the predicted interaction of Shape and Gesture was highly significant ( F [1, 23] = 12.0; p = 0.002; η 2 = 0.342).

As an additional analysis, we carried out a logistic regression analysis for SF-MMSE as a binary outcome variable (defined by the median value: participants scoring < 14 versus participants scoring ≥ 14); the maximally adjusted association remained highly significant (odds ratio per SD change in RNFL thickness, 1.10; 95% CI [1.04, 1.17]; P = 0.002).

On statistical analysis, the duration of anastomosis was highly significant (p=0.002) (Figure 1 ).

In fact, the rating differences for NH children's happy and sad utterances were highly significant, t (14) = −3.81, p = 0.002, and the same trend was evident for child CI, t (14) = −1.96, p = 0.07.

Genetic structure analyses revealed significant differences in haplotype frequencies among haplotypes resulting in a highly significant fixation index ( F ST = 0.0296, p = 0.002).

The relationship between DPP at admission and ambulation achievement was highly significant [X 2 (1, n = 22) = 9.900, p = 0.002], with all cats with doubtful DPP achieving ambulation.

A highly significant (p=0.002) moderate positive correlation was recorded in patients aged <50 and moderate positive correlation of borderline significance in males (r s =0.324, p=0.058).

These trends in IS and SWS were not significant, but as per above this was due to the low TST in the first hour of night: when this hour was omitted, there was a highly significant linear decrease in both IS (slope = -4.90 s/hour of night, r 2 = 0.732, p = 0.002) and SWS (slope = −7.66 s/hour of night, r 2 = 0.753, p = 0.001).

The probability of the incubation period having a MD of greater than 4 m was 71.64% (48/67), which was much higher than that of the brooding period (48.08%, 25/52) (Figure 4 .), and the values showed a highly significant difference (Chi‐squared test, χ 2 1 = 7.496, p = .002).

MMSE and USSLB do not correlate well ( r = −0.19, p = 0.34) and remain highly significant (both p = 0.002) in a combined regression model for betaine.

Compared with vehicle-treated animals (TAMs per μm 2 , 16.6±1.4 for SW-1990 and 82.8±4.6 for MIA PaCa-2), lurbinectedin treatment resulted in a highly significant reduction of TAMs in both SW-1990 (7.2±1.2, P =0.002) and MIA PaCa-2 (27.8±1.3, P =0.002) xenografts.

This decrease in the incidence of metastasis was highly significant ( P =0.002).

In the coded linear model, the intercept (constant term) of 5.8625 ( p < 0.001) described the mean pH at the design center, whereas the coefficient for PAW treatment time (Term B) was strongly negative (− 1.0750) and statistically highly significant ( p = 0.002), corresponding to a large, standardized effect size indicating that lengthening the activation from 0 to 20 min reduced pH by more than one unit over the studied space.

The significant interaction reflects that there was no significant difference between the reporting of the two modified motif types in the unfamiliar condition (p = 0.452, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1002 and 955 ms, respectively), whereas there was a highly significant difference in the response latencies for reporting the two modified motif types in the familiar condition (p = 0.002, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1219 and 1478 ms, respectively).

The free swell index emerges as a highly significant predictor (β = −2.4083, p = 0.002), confirming its importance as a mediating variable.

There was highly significant difference in L* between males and females ( P = 0.002).

CNVR correlations Of the 110 CNVR evident in more than 2 individuals, 22 loci demonstrated a significant pairwise association ( p ≤ 0.05) with at least one other loci across all 7 breeds, 11 of which demonstrated highly significant correlations ( p ≤ 0.002).

The positive correlation for subgroup C ( r C = 0.510, N = 33) ( Table 3 ) indicated a highly significant increase in network variability with age (P = 0.002); in contrast, that correlation in subgroup D was negative ( r D = − 0.143, N = 10) but not statistically significant (P = 0.693).