“highly significant”

Specifically, the inter‐hemispheric differences in the SCZ samples became highly significant after excluding one small dataset ( p < .002). 3.6.

This decrease in the incidence of metastasis was highly significant ( P =0.002).

We found a highly significant relationship between MS patient-linked admissions and latitude (r weighted by standard error (r sw ) = 0.75, p = 0.002).

The difference in the net rate of cladogenesis is highly significant (likelihood ratio test = 6.381, d.f. = 2, p = 0.002).

Results Mitochondrial effects We observed that incubation with phenalenone F134 induced a highly significant decrease of the ATP level of L. amazonensis promastigotes ( F (6, 20) = 10.504, P = 0.002).

Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that chromogranin A level and MTV together were highly significant predictors of therapeutic outcome (HR 2.67; 95% CI 1.41–4.91; p = 0.002).

Case–control differences in allele frequencies Apart from the highly significant lower B2 allele in the Chinese CAD + cases compared to the controls (p = 0.002), the allele frequencies for both the promoter and Taq1B polymorphisms are not significantly different between CAD + cases and controls in all the ethnic groups.

17 The main finding was the highly significant reduction of new MI occurrence in the complete group (7.9% vs 5.4%, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87, P = .002).

In contrast, the correlation between the presence of comorbidities and the in-patient course was highly significant (OR 4.286, CI 1.734–10.591, p = 0.002) (Table 5 ), in keeping with other studies, with patients with persistent chemosensory dysfunction more than four times more likely to require hospitalisation compared to those who had recovered.

Cumulative disease burden (an approximation of lesion volume) on MRI showed a highly significant effect of high dose IFNβ-1b compared to placebo (p = 0.002).

The increase of natural external factors as perceived illness cause was highly significant, with mean S -value increasing from 4.40 ± 1.17 at first to 5.18 ± 1.52 at second measurement ( p = 0.002).

As shown in Table 2 , the NC versus dementia (female) comparison with the 5 peak–based test shows a highly significant difference ( p value = 0.002), which remains below the Bonferroni‐corrected threshold (α = 0.006).

In responding patients HS1 variations before and after therapy, measured with a Paired Student’s t -test, was highly significant (western blotting p = 0.002 and Real-Time PCR p = 0.001) while in non responding patients the variation before and after therapy was significant only in Real-Time PCR (p = 0.024, western blotting p = 0.067) probably because of the little number of non responding patients.

McNemar χ 2 tests for the insusceptible category between the two tests yielded highly significant results for ceftriaxone (χ 2 =9.25, P =0.002) and cefixime (χ 2 =17.49, P =0).

Patient IgG levels were higher than controls for HKU1, NL63, and OC43, with HKU1 and NL63 both showing highly significant patient-to-control differences (HKU1, P ≤ .002; NL63, P ≤ .00001).

In a secondary analysis of the intention-to-treat weight loss data with last measured weight carried forward gave a highly significant diet group by time by gender interaction (p = 0.002) with men doing better in the No Choice group overall (maximum difference “No Choice “-2.9 ± 4.6 kg vs. “Choice”-6.2 kg ± 5.3 kg at 6 months) and women doing better in the Choice group overall (maximum difference Choice -3.1 ± 3.7 kg vs. “No Choice” -2.0 kg ± 2.6 kg at 6 months).

There was a trendwise significant positive correlation ( p = 0.053) between the PB levels of CRP and G-CSF at LON start, and a highly significant correlation between CRP at LON start and the G-CSF levels at end of LON ( p = 0.002; Fig. 5 C).

However, APD activity had a highly significant ( p = 0.002, adj.

Notably, IBE analysis demonstrated a highly significant correlation for Neon. orientalis ( r =0.464, P =0.002) compared to the other two species.

Strigiformes generally have a lower inner claw curvature than other raptors, with the difference highly significant (99.8%) for D-II (Strigiformes mean = 92.256 degrees, σ = 17.220; Accipitridae + Falconidae + Pandionidae mean = 112.823, σ = 15.964; t 29 = −3.185, p = 0.002).

The difference between the poor responders and the normal controls was highly significant p=0.002 (Table 3 ).

For brodifacoum and bromadiolone, these differences were highly significant (i.e. p ≤ 0.002; Table 1 ).

Even though there were very few PAI-1 positive tumours in organ confined stages (T1/T2), this molecular marker turned out to be a highly significant predictor of developing metachronous metastasis in these patients with HR = 13,71 (p = 0.002).

Although, as above, there was no effect in saturation values ( F (1,109) = 1.596, p = .209), there was a highly significant effect in luminance ( F (1,109) = 9.708, p = .002).

There was highly significant genotypic differentiation (Fisher's exact test = P<0.002, df = 14) within populations for all loci except Dicten18 and Dicten27 (Fisher's exact test = P>0.1, df = 14).