“highly significant”

180 min, p = 0.02), accompanied by a highly significant several-fold increase in GH concentrations (e.g., from 0.87 ± 1,47 ng/mL to 6.42 ± 5.72 ng/mL, 0 vs. 150 min, p = 0.002 ( Figure 1 , Table 1 )).

Figure 4 C demonstrated that, of 14 neurons examined, in all but one neuron the dry responses were much stronger than the responses to the 500 mOsm/L stimuli with highly significant average differences ( Fig. 4 D) between the dry and the HOS responses (respectively, 8.19 ± 0.31 vs. 6.09 ± 0.30 spikes/s; P = 0.0020, paired t -test, 2-tailed), suggesting that the dry responses were produced by the extracellular HOS stimuli whose intensities are greater than 500 mOsm/L (e.g., 600 mOsm/L), as suggested by Figure 3 .

Some values were highly significant ( P < 0.002, after Bonferroni correction), showing the existence of genetic differentiation among the samples analyzed (Table 5 ).

A t -test calculated across all farms confirmed the difference between the two site categories to be highly significant (p = 0.002).

The model demonstrated moderate discrimination with a concordance index of 0.667, and the overall likelihood-ratio test was highly significant (χ 2 = 19.4, p = 0.002). 3.8.

The differences in mean homoarginine concentrations across the stages of CKD were highly significant (p = 0.002).

Univariate ANCOVAs for single parameters revealed highly significant differences between groups for heart rate [F(3,69) = 6.8; p<.002], for RMSSD HRV [F(3,69) = 13.5; p<.001], for LF HRV [F(3,69) = 7.6; p<.001], for HF HRV [F(3,69) = 9.9; p<.001], for compression entropy HC HRV [F(3,69) = 10.8; p<.001], and for respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) [F(3,69) = 17.8; p<.001].

Without this outlier, the interaction between TMS and Task was highly significant [ F (1,22) = 11.7, P = 0.002]; effective TMS slowed responses on the action task relative to the location task [ t (22) = 3.2, P = 0.004, Cohen's d = 0.65], with no such difference during sham stimulation [ t (22) = 0.9, P = 0.38, Cohen's d = 0.18].

For instance, a highly significant increase of UpT CDI can be observed in Chr7, Chr16, Chr17 and Chr19 (p < 0.002 in comparison to all other chromosomes by chi squared test), while an increase of DownT CDI is detected in Chr2, Chr4, Chr5, Chr6, Chr13, Chr18, Chr21 (p < 0.002).

However, correlational analyses between MMI and BFI scores revealed a highly significant association between Extraversion and MMI scores ( Table 2 ; r = 0.347, p = 0.002).

Prehistoric fish were always bigger than contemporary Atlantic salmon and brown trout ( figure 1 a ), with highly significant differences for 1-, 2- and 3-year-old fish despite the limited archaeological sample size ( t -tests>3.5, p <0.002 in all cases).

Statistical analysis using only the highest lesional scores showed that there was a highly significant difference between endoscopic and histopathological PULS grading ( p = 0.002) (Table 3 ).

RDA ordination (growth response) Results of Monte Carlo permutation tests showed highly significant effects ( p = 0.002 with 499 permutations) of the influence factors on the growth responses of the T . distichum trees.

SM exhibited a highly significant negative correlation between mtCN and the total number of heteroplasmies for all three methods (r = -0.27 to -0.31, all p≤0.002; Fig 4 and S4 Table ).

The expectations toward an ideal e-mental health app were not related to the age of the participants, except in the factor transparency in the group of the patients: The older the patient, the more emphasis he or she put on the opinion that an ideal e-mental health app should be transparent (ie, clear who designed the app, scientific evidence, etc) with a highly significant association ( r =.35, P =.002; experts: r =–0.01, P =.88; students: r =–0.02, P =.87).

The interaction effects between IL-10 response and sewage system were highly significant ( p -values = 0.002, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively, for IFN-γ, IL-5 and IL-13).

RDA returned a highly significant association between oocyst output and OTU profile (pseudo-F = 3.7, p = 0.002).

Specifically, the reduction in OK was statistically significant ( p = 0.014, d = 0.81, CI 95% = [0.15, 1.47]), and in mus308 , the reduction was highly significant ( p = 0.002, d = 1.25, CI 95% = [0.49, 2.01])—suggesting a cytotoxic effect of smoke exposure on spermatogenesis or viability.

A highly significant correlation was found between DLQI and HECSI scores ( p = 0.002) (Fig. 1 a) and between TEWL and HECSI scores ( p = 0.034) (Fig. 1 b).

At lower than the median elevation capital, the relationship was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

A highly significant rightward shift in the ZSF1‐obese line was observed ( P = .002), while the slope was not different ( P = .19).

We found highly significant (p< 0.002) evidence for neuronal damage in the cortex, hippocampus, and basal ganglia in the brains of exposed rats. status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Full Text The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (340.2 KB).

Within 2 h of incubation, CVMgO_OA, CVZnMgO_OA, and CVZnO_OA samples all demonstrated highly significant bactericidal activity against S. aureus 8325-4 (≥4 log reduction; P = 0.002), under both white-light and dark conditions ( Figure S11 ).

However, it was highly significant compared with that caused by LIRA alone (−0.19 ± 0.11 mg/kg/min) ( P = 0.002).

The success rate of block compared using Fisher's exact test was found to be highly significant in variation-3 ( P = 0.002).