Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, at the end of the intervention, a highly significant difference could be noted between the groups, with a higher score in the active treatment group (t = 3.11; P = 0.002).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant correlation between pathway abundance and species distance matrices ( r = 0.299, P = 0.002; Table 1 ) from the metagenomic data. 16S rRNA genera versus metagenomic species and 16S rRNA versus metabolites had the second and third highest correlation values ( r = 0.117, P = 0.067; r = 0.103, P = 0.039), respectively.
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When examined separately (Figure 2B , gray curves), the effect of depressiveness scores was not significant in scrambled sentences on separation and loss ( z = −1.07, p = 0.14, one-tailed) but highly significant in the optimism set ( z = −2.96, p = 0.002, one-tailed).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our data clearly showed that by 24 h, the GUS transcript level increased by ~ 3.5 fold from 3 h, which was highly significant when compared to 3 and 9 h ( p = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively, Fig. 3 ), an indicator of the improved efficiency of transient transformation, suggesting that extended AS induction time could be a valuable approach to improve large size T-DNA transfer to rice cells.
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The pH value of fasting-morning urine correlated directly and significantly with potassium excretion ( R = 0.33, p = 0.02) but not with 24 h citrate levels ( R = 0.09; p = 0.58) while a highly significant correlation between potassium and citrate excretion was found ( R = 0.47, p = 0.002).
highly significantp < 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For these 21 miRNAs, all data from stage I and stage II were merged and analyzed together resulting in highly significant DEG that survived Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (p < 0.002 [0.05/21]) and ROC between 0.9–1.0 were calculated for most genes suggesting a complete or almost complete separation of gene expression relative to the pre-exposure reference (bold p-values, Supplement Table 2 , right part).