“highly significant”

Although, as above, there was no effect in saturation values ( F (1,109) = 1.596, p = .209), there was a highly significant effect in luminance ( F (1,109) = 9.708, p = .002).

Similarly, to attentional and behavioral response, the interaction was highly significant: nomDF/denDF = 3/4089, F = 5.11, p = 0.002.

This is driven by a highly significant difference at the first site (air 11%, ground 83%, exact test, P = 0.002) with a larger (although not significantly so) proportion at the second site (air 7%, ground 15%, P = 0.32).

However, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002) was observed in the Heidelberg score at 3 months in the success group (SG) compared to the failure group (FG).

the sample is highly significant statistically, whereas using the acidic medium, the same situation has been observed i.e. sample treatment is also highly significant ( p = 0.002).

In contrast, after removing the weight change attributable to litter size, there remained a highly significant increase in weight of HET pups produced from Eed del/del growing oocytes compared to HET pups produced from Eed wt/del oocytes ( t 34.8 = 3.44, P = 0.002) and WT pups produced from either Eed wt/del ( t 36.3 = 2.81, P = 0.008) or Eed wt/wt ( t 33.1 = 2.29, P = 0.03) growing oocytes (Fig. 3e ).

According to the analysis, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002) was observed between the Mean and Median methods for both Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifiers, regardless of the distance metric (Euclidean or Manhattan) used.

At each assessment, the Fisher’s exact analysis of those having categorical change was highly significant ( P < 0.002), with more oral treprostinil participants having an improved risk profile and fewer having a deteriorated risk profile ( Figure 4C ).

Results Analyzing the distribution by gender in patients with CAG, a predominance of female gender 69.84% (44), with a sex ratio F:M = 2.3:1was evidenced, the association being statistically highly significant ( P = .002, OR: 2.667, 95% CI: 1.419–5.013) (Table 1 ).

Although the number of cells did not decrease to the levels found in control non-sensitized animals, the decrease was dose proportional and highly significant (p < 0.002) when compared to OVA-sensitized mice which did not receive ASM-024.

In the 9-digit sequences it was, in contrast, slightly (not significantly; p = 0.093) larger in the control task, and the same effect was highly significant in the 13-digit sequences (p = 0.002).

Head circumference ( F = 24.2, p < 0.0001) exhibited a highly significant variation in the population of exposed girls as did weight ( F = 3.85; p = 0.002), BMI ( F = 3.72; p = 0.003), and upper arm circumference ( F = 2.39; p = 0.04).

Importantly, there were highly significant spatial attention × hemisphere interactions (P1: F (1,28) = 11.89, p = .002, η 2 p = 0.30; N1: F (1,28) = 30.13, p <.0001, η 2 p = 0.52), which resulted from both the P1 and N1 amplitudes being significantly larger in response to spatially attended than unattended visual

However, the quadratic model for TPC exhibited a highly significant lack‐of‐fit ( p = 0.002), indicating that the model did not adequately fit the experimental data (see Table S4 ).

The increase in LDL aggregation in the SAT group was also highly significant in ANCOVA ( P =0.002) with baseline aggregation as the covariate.

In addition, in the quartiles cases the MGMT was highly significant prognostic parameter with a Log-Rank test of p=0.002 and a Wilcoxon test of p=0.001.

A Mantel test performed on a matrix of pairwise geographic distances and a matrix of pairwise values of G ′′ ST was highly significant ( R xy = 0.385, P = 0.002), indicating that genetic structure can be described by a pattern of isolation by geographic distance.

aegypti was substantially reduced from 15,615 specimens collected on week 6 to 1,817 on week 9 and 1,001 on week 10, yielding highly significant values on weeks 9 and 10 ( P = 0.002 and P < 0.0001, respectively) when compared to the control baseline.

Results We found a highly significant effect of condition (i.e., video category) on the relative HR change from pre-baseline to video presentation ( X 2 = 9.91, df = 2, p = 0.002), i.e., heart rate changed differently depending on the video category.

Mentalizing categories The effect of mentalizing category was highly significant, F (2, 350) = 6.54, p = 0.002.

Notably, 2 GOs of 111 gene sets, regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway and regulation of inflammatory response, were found to include 5 of those 14 genes and showed highly significant associations ( P = 0.002, Fig. 5 ).

Multivariate analyses revealed response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy highly significant correlated to improved recurrence-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.017).

The treatment effect was highly significant (p = 0.002), with an adjusted mean change for the InterX group of -2.15 improvement vs. an adjusted mean change of improvement for the control group of -0.34.

Both current smoking rate and cessation rate remained to be highly significant even after controlling for age, education, occupation, and living apartment (p = 0.002 for current smoking rate and p = 0.004 for cessation rate).

When the association between the degree of root resorption and age was analyzed using the numerical method, for the mesial root, highly significant differences were found between the means of the group aged 6–9 years and the group over 15 years old, with a value of 0.218 (95% CI 0.061–0.374; p value = 0.002).