“highly significant”

Average canopy density increased from about 21% at the lowest elevations to 48% at the highest, a highly significant increase (ANOVA: F 3,20 = 6.80; p < 0.005), but this pattern is not as clear in transect 233 N.

ns p > 0.05 indicates no significant differences, ⁣ ∗ p < 0.05 indicates significant differences, ⁣ ∗∗ p < 0.01 indicates highly significant differences, and ⁣ ∗∗∗ p < 0.005 or ⁣ ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 indicates extremely significant differences. 3.

When evaluating the individual average contributions over all periods across PCC and FR, we find that there is a highly significant difference across these two treatments (Non-parametric Mann Whitney test, z = -2.791, p = 0.005).

We designed and transfected three ZNF667‐AS1 silencing sequences (Table S1 ) and found that the interference efficiency of si‐ZNF667‐AS1 with siRNA‐1 and siRNA‐3 sequences was significant ( P < 0.05), among which the interference efficiency of siRNA‐1 was highly significant ( P < 0.005), while that of siRNA‐2 was not significant ( P > 0.05; Fig. 2 C,F).

The treatment effect on LVM was greater when analysed using the per-protocol population with a highly significant reduction in LVM (change in LVM: metformin group −7.53 ± 4.66 g vs. placebo group −3.13 ± 6.36 g; P = 0.005).

This reduction in tubule area proved highly significant ( P < 0.005), such that the mice treated with LH2Auristatin and FSH2Menadione/LH2Auristatin exhibited a 40% reduction in mean tubule area compared to the testes of the control group.

In comparison, drug treated cells when exposed to the same amount of 131 I, highly significant reduction in the cell survival (p ≤ 0.005) was observed in all three cell lines.

A highly significant ( p = 0.005) negative correlation was found between ampicillin and both tetracycline (r = −0.375) and oxytetracycline (r = −0.376) detection using HPLC.

Analysis of latency of uncertainty coding In standard uncertainty tasks, each neuron’s smoothed normalized activity aligned at CS onset was further smoothed with a 101 ms causal boxcar kernel and then tested at each millisecond starting 50 ms after CS onset for whether it met the following criteria: (1) highly significant ROC area for distinguishing pooled data from uncertain reward CSs from the certain 0% reward CS (p < 0.005), (2) highly significant ROC area for distinguishing pooled data from uncertain reward CSs from the certain 100% reward CS ( p < 0.005); (3) both ROC areas have the same “sign” (i.e., both > 0.5 indicating activation by uncertainty or < 0.5 indicating inhibition by uncertainty).

Results and Discussion The grey square was judged as brighter following a musical prime with positive valence and darker following a musical prime with negative valence ( Fig 4 ), as indicated by the highly significant effect of valence, F (1,19) = 12.12, p < 0.005.

The associations between LLS and BMI, and BMI and CRP were highly significant (β = 0.33, p = 0.005 and β = 0.34, p = 0.004, respectively).

This result is highly significant in favor of the taken approach (p<0.005, 1-tailed binomial test); predictions of type 1 were the most accurate.

A highly significant negative correlation (r=-0.47; P =.005) between velocity in week 1 (MW_VEL1) and path length during the first trial block was observed in mGlu4 -/- mice.

It also revealed that Group II showed a highly significant decrease in comparison with Group I ( P < 0.005) [Table 5a and b ].

( 1997 ), evaluating 29 patients for 180 days preceding the 1‐year post‐transplant exam, showed a highly significant inverse correlation ( p = 0.005 in univariate analysis) between CD4 + T cell counts and total infection score (i.e., frequency and severity) but not with CD8 + T cell numbers, B cell numbers, serum immunoglobulin levels, or delayed hypersensitivity responses.

This difference was highly significant (P = 0.005).

Statistical significance was marked as significant = p < 0.05, highly significant = p < 0.005 and very highly significant = p < 0.0005.

It can be noted that both groups showed significant score reductions in all domains, particularly abandonment, impulsiveness, emotional instability, and anger, in which highly significant reductions (p < 0.005) were observed in both the 1 Hz and 5 Hz groups.

These regressions were all highly significant (R 2 s ranging from 0.14 to 0.51, all p values < 0.005) but variable, with lower R 2 s generally observed for the lowest CAG repeat lengths.

There is a highly significant elevation in the levels of the oxidative stress markers (MDA, H 2 O 2 ) in the RDS group versus the control one (p < 0.005).

Statistics were based on the p -value obtained by the significance test method, with p -value < 0.001 considered as a highly significant difference, 0.001 < p -value < 0.005 considered as a significant difference, and p -value > 0.005 considered as no significant difference.

There was a highly significant improvement in comparison to the preoperative status (p<0.005).

We identified strong and highly significant correlations (r > ±0.6, p < 0.005) between the amount of retroperitoneal fat and the expression of ADIPOQ (r = −0.65, p = 0.003), GRB10 (r = −0.62, p = 0.005), INPPL1 (r = 0.71, p = 0.0006), LEP (r = 0.74, p = 0.0003), OSBPL10 (r = 0.69, p = 0.001), RNF10 (r = 0.70, 0.0009), and SP1 (r = −0.65, p = 0.002).

Moreover, there was a highly significant statistical difference between the two groups regarding the mean LVEF after PCI by modified Simpson's methods ( P < 0.005) Table 1 .

In particular, with the exclusion of studies with salivary tubes applied in less than 20% of cases, heterogeneity (I 2 = 57%) could be improved, reaching finally a highly significant result for the meta-analysis (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.23–0.78; p = 0.005).