“highly significant”

Further decomposition of factor effects revealed that differences among the three plots (R, S, and W) had a highly significant influence on community variation ( R 2 = 11.89%, P = 0.008), indicating substantial differences in community composition between the R, S, and W blocks.

ILT size changes over time were highly significant over the course of the study (p<0.008).

Correlations between qPCR- and 16S-ASV-based MOB community proportion and CH 4 uptake were highly significant ( p < 0.008).

Additionally, factors affecting a higher identification of new possible scores of post-traumatic growth were more highly significant for social support of donors’ significant others (β = 0.182, p = 0.008).

In this subset ( Figure 1 ), the all texts group was associated with a highly significant reduction in the odds of undergoing CS (OR 0.66, P =.008).

A highly significant increase of the CD34 + CD45 dim CD133 + c-Kit + ( p = 0.008) was observed (Fig. 5f ) while no difference existed in the CD34 + CD45 dim CD133 + c-Kit − population (Fig. 5e ).

The standard interaction effect was not significant ( F (4,96) = 2.38, P = 0.57), but the cubic interaction effect was highly significant ( F (1,24) = 8.51, P = 0.008).

However, a similar association with changes in CSF anti-IgLON5 IgG4 was highly significant ( p = 0.008, Figure 4C , right panel), confirming CSF anti-IgLON5 IgG as the major influence on zQ IgLON5-IgG4 .

When comparing the effects of ZM241385 with MRS1754 regarding their ability to reverse the adenosine-suppressed K Ca 3.1 current, there was a highly significant difference ( p =0.008).

The association between the reduction in achieved HbA1c and non-fatal stroke was highly significant (beta = − 0.531, P = 0.008, variance explained = 100%) (Table 2 ) and accounted for almost all the association between MACE and HbA1c reduction.

Similarly, Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p = 0.008), confirming the presence of correlations among the variables and justifying the application of the model.

A highly significant difference (p = 0.008) was observed for partial responders between both groups with a higher proportion in the CTx + VA group (30.8%) compared to the CTx only group (10.3%).

2 ) One way ANOVA showed highly significant differences among the three groups ( p < 0.008).

However, whereas the direct effect of central atrophy on GDT net-score was highly significant (p = 0.008), the indirect effect via processing speed was decidedly not significant (p = 0.99).

An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that freezing during the last three trials of extinction does not predict freezing at 24-h recall, F (1,37) = 0.96, P = .34, and the effect of phenotype on 24-h recall remains highly significant even after adjusting for freezing differences during extinction, F (1,37) = 7.81, P = .008.

The positive correlations between resin collection and pathogen loads were highly significant for colonies with additional propolis (Kendall’s rank correlation: V. destructor : z = 2.43, r = 0.47, p = 0.008; DWV: z = 2.58, r = 0.5, p = 0.005), but weaker (Kendall’s rank correlation: V. destructor : z = 1.89, r = 0.37, p = 0.029) or not significant (Kendall’s rank correlation: DWV: z = 1, r = 0.20, p = 0.16) for propolis removed colonies ( Figure 3 a).

However, a highly significant interaction effect between treatment groups (CBD vs. placebo) and age of subjects was observed for the PI ratio ( P = 0.008; n = 35).

In the full sample (V versus NV), the analysis revealed a single highly significant CCA mode that related brain connectomes to subject measures ( r = 0.94, p = 0.008).

Interestingly, in lymph node positive patients, there was highly significant correlation between FGF19 expression and age of patients (p=0.008).

Here, we found a highly significant effect of reward [ F 1,19 = 8.86, p = 0.008], indicating that subjects were more likely to sustain effort in the late reward period when a high, as compared with a low, reward was at stake (placebo: t 19 = 3.68, p = 0.002; levodopa: t 19 = 2.87, p = 0.010; haloperidol: t 19 = 1.87, p = 0.076).

However, the relationship between CV and altitude was highly significant ( r = 0.809, P = 0.008; Fig. 2 ).

Highly significant simple principal effects of background noise [F (2,36)=4.73, p=0.008] and reverberation [F (2,36)=6.31, p=0.006] were observed.

For the recessive model, there was no significant heterogeneity between the results of the individual studies (χ 2 6 = 9.9, p = 0.1), although there was a highly significant trend towards the null with increasing study size (χ 2 1 = 7.0, p = 0.008).

The test was highly significant, as all slopes were positive ( p = 0.008).

The log-likelihood ratio test results comparing the piecewise model to the simple linear model were highly significant ( p = 0.008).