“highly significant”

Of specific relevance for human AML, in leukemia driven by both NPM1c and a FLT3 activating mutation a highly significant survival advantage was demonstrated ( P =0.008)( Figure 6d ).

The combined odds ratio was 1.35 (1.08–1.70), with a highly significant P = 0.008.

A correlational analysis between coach rated game intelligence and DF-total correct demonstrated a highly significant and moderate relation between the two factors ( r = 0.37, p = 0.008).

The seroprevalence of IgG antibodies exhibited highly significant differences between distinct age groups (P=0.008).

However, a highly significant interaction effect between treatment groups (CBD vs. placebo) and age of subjects was observed for the PI ratio ( P = 0.008; n = 35).

Patients with PsA showed a highly significant reduction in the frequency of classic plaque ( p = 0.008).

The interaction between teamwork and job engagement is highly significant, b = 0.01, 95% CI (0.003, 0.02), t = 2.69, p = 0.008, indicating that the relationship between job engagement and job satisfaction is moderated by teamwork.

However, we observed a tendency ( P = 0.09) toward an increase in UCP5 mRNA levels in the fructose offspring compared with control, and interestingly, we found a highly significant inverse correlation between UCP5 mRNA levels and the P/O 2 ratio ( P = 0.008) ( Figure 2B ).

This correlation was highly significant (P = 0.008).

HnRNP K undergoes progressive increase from NHP to NT to PCa; the differences in expression were significant between NT and PCa ( P =0.0003), between NT and PCa with low-intermediate Gleason scores ( P =0.014) and highly significant between low-intermediate and high Gleason scores ( P =0.008).

Rotigotine The time × treatment interaction was highly significant ( p = 0.008).

Follow-up Tukey tests revealed that there was a significant difference between each condition but the crucial comparison, 4 exemplars versus the best exemplar was highly significant t (116) = 3.42, p = 0.008.

The difference between the groups is highly significant ( p = 0.008).

The positive correlations between resin collection and pathogen loads were highly significant for colonies with additional propolis (Kendall’s rank correlation: V. destructor : z = 2.43, r = 0.47, p = 0.008; DWV: z = 2.58, r = 0.5, p = 0.005), but weaker (Kendall’s rank correlation: V. destructor : z = 1.89, r = 0.37, p = 0.029) or not significant (Kendall’s rank correlation: DWV: z = 1, r = 0.20, p = 0.16) for propolis removed colonies ( Figure 3 a).

When partitioned into low (n = 16) and high (n = 17) reactive groups, the high reactive group showed a highly significant decrease in SBR during the IT period compared to baseline (11.1 ± 1.09 blinks per min to 6.2 ± 0.95 blinks per min, t 1,30 = − 2.9, p = 0.008) and a significant increase in SBR from baseline during the CT period (11.1 ± 1.09 blinks per min to 15.6 ± 1.71 blinks per min, t 1,30 = 2.7, p = 0.012).

The Bonferroni post-hoc test revealed a significant difference between S1 and S3 ( p = 0.014), and a highly significant difference between S2 and S3 ( p = 0.008) ( Figure 2 ).

A highly significant difference (TOC higher when compared to TATE) was found for primary tumors ( P = 0.008), liver ( P = 0.000) and lymph node ( P = 0.000) metastases, while uptake of 68 Ga-DOTATOC was significantly higher in bone metastases ( P = 0.011).

A highly significant correlation is observed between positive emotion and the FC between WM7 and GM7 ( r = −0.720; P < 0.008, FDR corrected) during jet lag.

Here, we found a highly significant effect of reward [ F 1,19 = 8.86, p = 0.008], indicating that subjects were more likely to sustain effort in the late reward period when a high, as compared with a low, reward was at stake (placebo: t 19 = 3.68, p = 0.002; levodopa: t 19 = 2.87, p = 0.010; haloperidol: t 19 = 1.87, p = 0.076).

This highly significant difference in the measuring of the vaginal length (p = 0.008) was however not surprising: besides the ‘observer-bias’ there is also an important influence of the circumstances and environment.

The standard interaction effect was not significant ( F (4,96) = 2.38, P = 0.57), but the cubic interaction effect was highly significant ( F (1,24) = 8.51, P = 0.008).

We observed a highly significant ( P = 0.008) negative correlation (correlation coefficient = −0.58) between circulating TNF-α and Marshall Score, taken across all time points in all patients (survivors and non-survivors; Fig. 2A ).

A highly significant increase of the CD34 + CD45 dim CD133 + c-Kit + ( p = 0.008) was observed (Fig. 5f ) while no difference existed in the CD34 + CD45 dim CD133 + c-Kit − population (Fig. 5e ).

The mean baseline acuity was 20/494 (log Mar=1.338±0.455) and the mean acuity at three months following the second intravitreal injection was 20/295 (log Mar=1.094±0.254), a difference that was highly significant ( P =0.008).

In the winter, these observed spatial distinctions were maintained and further expanded by an additional, highly significant divergence between the IPs and PLSs (F = 53.019, p = 0.008).