Combining the data for Col-0 and Ws-0 together, the results demonstrated that the segregation distortion against dem mutations through the female germline was highly significant ( P < 0.01; Table 1 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The abundance of Weissella and Lactobacillus presented highly significant differences among the five samples ( P < 0.01).
Furthermore, during 8 h in the light phase (09:00–17:00), there was a highly significant reduction in the liver glutathione content in the rats reared under food restriction ( p <0.01), and the RF group sacrificed at 16:00 had significantly lower glutathione contents than the ALF group ( p <0.01).
fractional CO 2 laser sexual dysfunction topical corticosteroids vulvar dermatoses vulvar lichen sclerosus Subjects showed highly significant improvement ( p < 0.01) in elasticity at all follow‐up visits.
The simplified factor analysis shows the highly significant (p < 0.01) correlation between PET acquisition time and applied activity on PET image quality.
The statistical significance was defined at P < 0.05 with highly significant values at P < 0.01; trends were declared at 0.05 < P < 0.1.
As shown in Table 4 , the model was highly significant ( p < 0.01), and the lack‐of‐fit term was not significant ( p > 0.05).
If 7 evaluators indicated correctly, the data was considered highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Statistical analysis revealed highly significant treatment effects for all genotypes ( p < 0.01 for Giza 178 and Sakha 104; p < 0.001 for Giza 177 and Sakha 108).
The results revealed that the mean differences for FaP1A1, FaP2E11 and FaP2D12 were highly significant ( p < 0.01) while FaP2E2 and FaP2E9 was significant ( p < 0.05) ( Table 4 ).
The difference was highly significant between Group I and Group C ( P = 0.01; df = 74) and Group T and Group C ( P = 0.01; df = 73).
Correlation between psychological questionnaires Pearson correlation coefficients between HAD anxiety subscale and STAI state anxiety and trait anxiety were highly significant (0.621 and 0.607 respectively, p < 0.01) suggesting strong correlation between questionnaires and good concurrent validity.
Results NSC concentrations and composition in different treatments In the leaves, WD caused a highly significant decrease in soluble sugar concentration of 15.3% compared to CT ( p < 0.01), with no significant effect of W or D alone ( Figure 2A ).
Additionally, age had a highly significant effect on all amino acids except Gly and Pro ( P < 0.01).
Agronomic traits and dry matter content According to the ANOVA, irrigation limit (W), nitrogen (N) rate, and their interaction (W×N) had significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.01) effects on all measured agronomic traits and dry matter content at both seedling and flowering stages (Table 2 ).
the degree of decrease or increase, in the observation group were significantly greater than those in the control group, and this difference was highly significant statistically ( P < .01) (see Table 4 ). 3.4.
At the end of the storage period, the count was below an arbitrary maximum acceptable limit of 7.0 Log CFU/g [ 17 ], and the effect of chitosan in containing the growth was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Indeed, when exclusive Cladocera data were analyzed against all other taxa (Figure 1 ), the statistical difference was highly significant (Mann‐Whitney U test, p < 0.01).
The percentage of FluoroGold-positive neurons was 28.8 ± 4.5% and 26 ± 3.5%, respectively, in the saline and GFP animals versus 11.77 ± 1.6% in the SCYL1BP1-injected animals ( Figure 6, B and C ); this difference was highly significant ( t test, p < 0.01).
In a converse trend, highly significant ( p < 0.01) increases in the aforementioned parameter were detected in the experimental groups that received BPO (BPO1.0 and BPO1.5) compared to those in the control and RPO groups. 3.4.
The results revealed a positive and highly significant correlation between the NPQ and SPQ scores ( r = 0.84, p < 0.01).
A single module showed highly significant module-trait correlations using |r| ≥ 0.7 and p < 0.01 as the determination criteria.
Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****).
The result was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05 (*) and regarded as highly significant when P < 0.01(**).
This difference was highly significant (p < 0.01) at DPO90 and DPO120, respectively.