“highly significant”

The results showed that the correlation between the four vegetation indices and the leaf area index of the maize inbred was highly significant (p<0.01) at each growth period, which also proved the feasibility of the linear regression estimation of LAI using vegetation indices.

In Mobility module, both the PT and TNPEE groups demonstrated substantial, highly significant gains in mobility knowledge ( p < 0.01; r = 0.72 and 0.80, respectively), whereas Nursing students showed a more modest, borderline improvement ( p = 0.05; r = 0.45).

SO 4 2− and Cd showed highly significant associations ( p < 0.01), suggesting that these factors play a key role in shaping microbial structure ( Figure 5 A).

Results were considered significant at P <0.05 and highly significant at P <0.01.

Compared to CON, L-OEO exhibited a significant increase in the abundance of Bacteroidota ( p < 0.05) and a highly significant reduction in Firmicutes_A ( p < 0.01).

Whether or not visual feedback of the system was available, the effect of haptic feedback was highly significant on both the success and failure rates (p < 0.01), indicating the importance of artificial sensations of touch to successfully perform the complex simultaneous control task.

2 , a one-way ANOVA was conducted on batting accuracy in the retention test and the transfer test, and the between-group F = 10.324, p < 0.01, for the three groups in the retention test was highly significant; in the transfer test, the between-group F = 12.311, p < 0.01, and the between-group difference was highly significant.

There was a significant intergroup difference at 10 min after caudal injection, which became highly significant thereafter ( p < 0.01).

Source Analysis As shown in Table 2 , the Pearson correlation coefficients for the eight heavy metals revealed a highly significant positive correlation among Pb, As, and Hg ( p < 0.01).

Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, highly significant differences were indicated by p < 0.01, and p > 0.05 was considered as no significant difference. 3.

* indicates significant correlation between protein and quality traits ( P < 0.05), ** indicates highly significant association ( P < 0.01).

There was a highly significant difference (p<0.01) in the tiller angle between Hap1 and Hap3 in the indica subpopulation in both environments ( Table 5 ).

For the multiple response NPS variable, the significance of the differences among the proportions of NPS categories was evaluated through the non-parametric Cochran’s Q test, which yielded highly significant differences in the proportions of the four NPS categories (Cochran's chi2(3) = 1133.129, p<0.01) [ 43 ].

Second, after the transfer of these tissues to regenerative conditions, the varieties showed highly significant differences in organogenetic/embryogenic calli production ( p ≤ 0.01) after 7 weeks of culture.

Results were considered significant at P<0.05 or highly significant at P<0.01.

The difference between T0 and T6 was highly significant ( p = 0.010), and there was no significant change between T1 and T6.

EXTP promoted root elongation ( Figure 2 I), which was highly significant ( p < 0.01) compared with both CK and DS.

With increasing slope on the AB and AD surfaces, the interactive effect was highly significant ( p < 0.01), the AC interactive effect was significant ( p < 0.05), and the BC , BD , and CD interactive effect were not significant ( p > 0.05).

These dif- ferences were all highly significant (p < 0.01).

Results : After 12 weeks of EAA intervention, EAAG showed a highly significant increase ( p < .01) in mean RTs and accuracy in the Flanker and More‐odd shifting tasks and a highly significant increase ( p < .01) in accuracy only in 1‐Back.

NK4A214_group showed a positive correlated with the numbers of total born and born alive ( p < 0.05), and a highly significant positive correlated with the numbers of healthy piglets ( p < 0.01).

[ 10 ] formula showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01).

In the case of vitamin A retention, it is particularly worth noting the highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) effect of the season in which the milk for production of experimental cheese was obtained.

The variance level indicated in the overall SART2 model was not significant, but the stress/PetCO 2 interaction was highly significant ( p = 0.01).

Values are denoted as significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.01). 3.