“highly significant”

Therefore, we utilized VarScan, a package for analyzing sequence variants in parallel sequencing data, to define locations where C>G transversions were both frequent (≥4%) and highly significant ( P <0.01) in both anti-V5-NSUN2 replicates, but not in the IgG only control.

The mean quality score for all bases from bisulfite converted libraries (N = 4) across each of the 5 lanes was (1% PhiX: 37.58 ± 0.03, 10% PhiX: 37.56 + 0.08, 20% PhiX: 37.44 ± 0.1, 30% PhiX: 37.18 ± 0.07, 50% PhiX: 36.42 ± 0.07), which corresponds to a linear, highly significant (p < 0.01 for all comparisons) decrease in quality as PhiX spike-in concentration increased; Importantly, all of these quality scores are excellent (mean phred score >35).

It was found that there was a mostly positive but weakly significant relationship between digital game addiction and children’s eating behaviors ( P <.01; P <.05) and a highly significant relationship was found between the sleep disorder scale sleep hyperhidrosis sub-dimension ( P <.05).

To the contrary, TGFβ expanded CD25 + Tregs more in patients than in HCs, and the difference was highly significant with 1 ug/ml TGFβ ( P < 0.01).

Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05, with highly significant results defined as P < 0.01.

For near vision, improvements were found in focusing, maintaining focus, tracking, near visual field, and color vision ( p < 0.05), while light sensitivity and image recognition yielded highly significant differences ( p < 0.01).

RT-qPCR results showed that the expression levels of SHISA3 were lower in the lung than in spleen, kidney, muscle and lymph ( P < 0.05), and RFC3 was the lung had a highly significant higher expression level than the heart, liver, spleen, and muscle ( P < 0.01).

Results In our study, involving M2 90 Moria microkeratome Lasik procedure, a highly significant post-Lasik reduction in IOPg (t-test = 8.62 (p<0.01), and a statistically significant reduction in IOPcc (t-test = 3.37 (p<0.05) by ocular response analyzer.

The linear term D, the interaction terms AB showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.01).

A Pearson correlation analysis revealed a highly significant negative correlation between the amount of dissolved P and the pH (r = -0.925**, p <0.01).

T max in summer had a significant increasing trend is 85.5% ( p< 0.05) of the area, among which 47.8% had a highly significant increasing trend ( p <0.01) ( Fig 3 ).

Comparison of the values by the rank sum test indicates highly significant differences ( P < 0.01).

Depletion of NK1.1 + T cells from the bone marrow CD4 + /CD8 + T cell population resulted in an eightfold reduction of IL-4 production (Table I ) that was highly significant ( P < 0.01, two-tailed Student's t test).

Comparable to expression classification, gender classification was highly significant in the rest-of-V1, during both tasks (performance = 61.3%, t 8 = 2.68, P = 0.01 and 65.12%, t 8 = 3.68, P = 0.003, in expression and gender tasks, respectively).

Additionally, two-way ANOVA (general linear model, univariate analysis in SPSS 26.0) was employed to evaluate interaction effects where an interaction was deemed as significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

In the present study, the difference between groups was deemed to be significant at p < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at p < 0.01 (**).

These four SNPs were highly significant with the corrected phenotype using the Kruskal-Wallis ( P < 0.01).

Second, as the chi-squared test may miss genes that have a fitness defect in only one condition, we also considered genes with highly significant defects in one condition (P<0.01 after Bonferonni correction, corresponding to Z<−3.88).

In addition, Mg and Zn had a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.01) at 21 days old, while K and Se had a significant negative correlation ( p < 0.05) at 49 days old.

The analysis of the table reveals a highly significant difference ( P -value < 0.01) among scenarios for the three outcomes (Table 3 ).

The results revealed a complex and highly significant network of associations (most correlations p<0.01, figure 1 ).

The percentage change in the curvature for all the four groups was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at P≤0.05 and highly significant at P≤0.01.

Glucose, wc and HDLc moved from a non-significant association with the outcome in model 2 to a highly significant association in model 4 ( P = 0.01, 0.02, and 0.004, respectively, Table 2 ).

SCFAs Figure 5 A showed a highly significant increase in ileum valeric acid content in the Pro group compared to the Con group ( P < 0.01).