“highly significant”

The conversion rate was 2.53% ( n = 133/5263) in the robotic and 11.94% ( n = 3874/32,442) in the laparoscopic group, and was highly significant to the favor of the robotic group ( p < 0.00001). 4.

1 , Supplementary Figure S1 ).The modules were numbered in increasing order from 1 to 30 according to scores of the clustering algorithm 15 (Supplementary Table S1 ); 1 is assigned to the module with the highest score (most densely connected to each other).Next, we assessed whether genes of the clustered terms are significantly interconnected in physical interactions by comparing each of 30 modules with randomly generated networks having the same gene number of the corresponding module and confirmed the highly significant inter-connectivity of them 12 (Supplementary Figure S2 , S3 , p < 0.00001), meaning that their components are not randomly distributed in the interactome.

However, year was highly significant ( P < 0.00001), while PI x year interaction was not significant ( P < 0.623).

The Fst values were relatively high and reached highly significant levels (p < 10 −5 ) between populations from Tak (all collection periods) and Yala-Narathiwat (21.75%), and between Ubon Ratchathani and Yala-Narathiwat (19.44%), implying genetic differentiation or limited gene flow between these endemic areas.

Higher birefringence was measured in fascicular regions of picrosirius red stained sections relative to matched unstained sections in both tendon types, and these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.00001 for both SDFTs and CDETs).

The heterogeneity test indicated a highly significant variance ( P < 0.00001, I2 = 94%), thus indicating the application of a random-effects model for the analysis.

There was a highly significant difference in composition by weighted UniFrac analysis ( p < 10 −5 ) (Fig. 3 b).

Here, we detected a total of six highly significant association signals ( p < 1 × 10 −5 ) for i-LT, corresponding to five unique genes, consistent with a previous report ( Supplemental Table 7 ) ( Wei et al., 2018 ) and suggesting the potential importance of these candidate genes for final PH in maize.

The depicted IBD segment in Figure 3 has a highly significant IBD score ( P -value < 1E-5).

Larger F ST and highly significant values were observed when distance matrices based on the U20_BFDSC genotypes were compared with those of East or South Asian and African populations ( p < 0.00001) ( Table 2 ).

In addition, disease duration correlated highly significant (p<0.00001) with the mean longitudinal FA changes in all tract systems.

The excess of transition paths is highly significant by a binomial test ( P < 10 − 5 ; here and below, we do not distinguish values of P below 10 − 5 ).

However, the differences in mean distances within the groups were highly significant ( F = 128.13, P = 0.00001) [ Table 5 ].

Results Copper levels were higher in group II showing statistically highly significant results compared with that of group I with p ≤ 0.00001.

Results remained highly significant when excluding the cross-fostered bats ( n = 11), which were only tested in year 3 ( P < 0.00001; learning : 0.19±17 vs. 0.45 ±0.19 error rates, respectively, R 2 =0.72, p < 0.00001, mixed GLM with learning set as the response variable, the origin as a fixed factor and the bat’s ID as a random effect, n = 65).

Phenotypic correlation Highly significant correlations were found between dormancy and GA 3 content in tubers ( P <0.00001).

Furthermore, a robust association between observed and predicted responses for TC degradation was evident from the highly significant regression model (p-value < 0.00001), high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9886), and well-adjusted R2 value (0.9780) 18 , 59 .

The proportion of individual habitats in hunting districts was statistically highly significant (Chi 2 with Yates = 361.92, df = 8, p <0.00001).

A Monte Carlo simulation determined that this is a highly significant overlap (p<1 × 10 −5 ) and peak heights at shared ATAC and CATaDa peaks show significant correlation (p<1 × 10- 16 , r 2 = 0.138) ( Figure 2—figure supplement 2A ).

This difference was found to be highly significant (OR=5.55, 95% CI 3.47 to 7.65, p < 0.00001), as shown in Figure 5 .

ESM-1b t s + ECFP) is statistically highly significant (McNemar’s test: p < 10 −5 ).

The strength of this dependence between the aCVT and aCrVT is demonstrated by highly significant p-values using a Fisher’s Exact Test of Independence (left p = 0.00001 and right p = 0.00018).

This was highly significant with a P = 0.00001.

The overall pooled effect size of acculturative stress in the intervention group was not significantly reduced versus control [mean difference: −0.36 (95% CI: −0.72, 0.00) at p = 0.05] with a highly significant difference in the heterogeneity (I 2 = 81% at p < 0.00001) ( Figure 4 a).

This segregation is highly significant (p < 0.00001 for the Mann-Whitney U test) confirming distinct patterns of strain neutralization specific to the eliciting virus.