“highly significant”

However, the difference was relatively small, and when we eliminated the regions overlapping promoters the differences in the substitution rates estimated for neutrally evolving sequences and lncRNAs remained highly significant (Wilcoxon test, P -value < 10 −5 ).

This result is highly significant ( p < 0.00001, the Fisher’s exact test).

For each variable, the correlation (Pearson coefficients) was highly significant ( p <.00001).

Faculties (JRs and BDS) and interns of medical and dental knew that BLS can be performed both inside and outside the hospital setup unlike the other groups, which showed the statistically highly significant P = 0.00001 (Q4).

There was a highly significant pre/post decrease in the in the emotional exhaustion (p < 0.00001) and depersonalization scores (p < 0.001), with highly significant increase in the personal accomplishment (p < 0.00001) scores.

Subgroup difference The test for subgroup differences was highly significant (χ2=41.18, df=1, p<0.00001), with I2=97.6% for the difference between subgroups.

The comparison between PSADT and the primary PSA level also revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.00001).

5 showed a highly significant difference for these pairs of groups, p < 0.00001.

All of the top 20 biological process pathways of the primary analysis ( Figure 1D , left panel) remained highly significant (adj p<0.00001).

Differences of EcPV2 detection rates in genital tumor-bearing (100%) versus control horses (1.2%) were highly significant with p < 0.00001.

There was a statistically highly significant reduction in the number of days taken for alignment of anterior teeth with the application of LASER ( P <.00001).

Gender exhibited a highly significant association (X2 = 45.9, p < 0.00001), highlighting differences in awareness levels between males and females; women are more knowledgeable than men.

Differences between collaborative cross strains in total luciferase expression were highly significant (F 11,44 = 9.64; p < 1 × 10 −5 ).

In blood-based samples (4 studies), the pooled log odds was 0.99 (SE = 0.23), with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) and a highly significant overall effect (Z = 7.29, P < 0.00001).

In unadjusted models, all indices maintained highly significant associations ( P < 10 −5 ), indicating predictive capacity beyond shared variance.

none of the fertile controls, a highly significant difference (P<0.00001).

Microbial composition was compared across samples using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, demonstrating a highly significant difference ( p < 10 −5 ) between feces and tissue ( Figure 1 A).

Overdose showed significant reductions from pre-operative to post-operative measurements, and the Nemo prognostic model was close to the final post-operative condition as reflected in the highly significant ANOVA (F = 13.66, p < 0.00001).

In fluency [ 17 , 18 , 21 , 41 , 77 ], there was a highly significant deficit in SZ (Hedge’s g = −2.03, df = 4, p < 0.00001, CI = [−2.82, −1.24]), but with large heterogeneity within results (84%) ( Figure 2 (2.6)).

There was a strong positive association of Cp biomarker positivity and asthma severity category that was highly significant (P<0.00001).

Increasing UF volume or dialysate flow led to a highly significant increase in IL-1 receptor antagonist and IL-6 clearance rates ( P < 0.00001).

For example, the differences in −6 nucleotide frequencies between our data set and the reference panel were highly significant (p<0.00001), yet the preference for guanine did not change; rather, the strength of the preference increased while the use of thymine at this position decreased in our refined panel.

Statistical result interpretation The one-way ANOVA test revealed a highly significant difference in AgNPs size among the four extract concentrations (F = 98.48, p < 0.00001), indicating that nanoparticle size is strongly influenced by extract concentration.

For dentin permeability, the Nd: YAG laser group differed significantly from the EDTA gel group ( p = 0.0032), while the combined treatment group showed highly significant differences compared with both the EDTA gel group and the Nd: YAG laser group ( p < 0.00001).

This comparison clearly demonstrated that CSC-affected eyes had SFCT which was ~145 μm (34%) bigger compared to normal control’ eyes (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 145.03, 95% confidence interval (CI), 121.33–168.73) and that this difference was highly significant (P<0.00001), with heterogeneity identified.