Statistical analysis supported these findings: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed a highly significant treatment effect (p < 0.0001), with Dunnett’s post hoc tests revealing intense erythema and edema responses only in the positive control (MD 1.48–3.83, p < 0.0001), while Novostron did not differ from the negative control at any observation point.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Further analysis of the 14 MRD-positive samples showed a highly significant correlation between the 10 log-transformed MRD data of both measurements ( R 2 = 0.999, P < .0001; slope = 1.0) FIGURE 1A ).
There was a highly significant positive correlation between the rate of pigment production and of (−)-botryodiplodin production ( r = 0.96, p ≤ 0.0001, regression analysis) for the selected M. phaseolina isolates. 2.8.
In total, 2 of 15 transient lineages carry longitudinally persistent and induced prophages, while 9 of 9 persistent lineages carry such prophages, and a Fisher’s exact test indicates a highly significant association between inducible phage and persistence of lineage ( P < .0001).
The overall prevalence of hypovitaminosis D was 61% [95% CI: 46% to 71%] with highly significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 99.72%; p < 0.0001).
Defining tumoral growth as the ratio between the final and initial tumor volumes, the increase during the treatment duration was on average 2.0 ± 0.7 (range: 1.4 - 3.2) and was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
highly significant p -value ( p= 0.0001 ) was found between FOXO1 methylation in the promoter region and protein expression, which represented a strong correlation Tables 5 , 6 , 7 Discussion FOXO subfamily of forkhead box transcription factor comprises four FOXO isoforms.
At 3 months the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated a highly significant difference among treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis H 3 = 23.42; 4 groups, n = 32, p < 0.0001).
The main frequency effect was highly significant ( F 3,24 = 41.10, P < 0.0001).
The results clearly demonstrate highly significant CD4 + and CD8 + T cell allogeneic immunization in partners practising unprotected homosexual (p<0.0001 and p = 0.001) or heterosexual (p = 0.001 and p<0.0001) intercourse, respectively.
Statistical analysis demonstrated that differences in MB Fpol between malignant and benign/normal groups were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
We observed a highly significant linear correlation between the cycle threshold (Ct) of both genes (beta-actin vs GAPDH, r = 0.912, F [ 1 , 46 ] = 157.73, p < 0.0001).
( 47 ) revealed that associations between age and comorbidity were highly significant (p < 0.0001), as the age-adjusted risk of comorbid death was 5.7 times greater in men with severe compared to those without comorbidities.
unaltered cars was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) 4 .
Further, the overall effect of SES was reduced from highly significant (p < 0.0001) in the base model to non-significant (p = 0.07) in model 4.
The parameters ranging between D 2% and D 98% and V 15Gy and V 70Gy were highly significant ( P < .0001) ( Supplementary Materials ).
All three factors: cell line, construct type and H 2 0 2 concentration, had highly significant effects (p < 0.0001) on log(RLU) after adjusting for the interactions and experiments.
Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences (****, p < 0.0001) between LPS control and the higher atorvastatin concentrations, confirming potent suppression of TNF-α production.
Besides, the other variants showed highly significant differences of the HDL-C with different genotypes in both sexes (all p- values < 0.0001).
The correlation is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
GLM analysis of ARI +D and ARI -D as dependent variables, indicated highly significant effects of directional sensitivity (p < 0.0001) and hypercapnia (p < 0.0001), without predictive contributions of age or sex.
Then, GWAS p- values and r 2 effects were analyzed, and QTL significance was determined as follows: “highly significant” refers to p- value < 0.0001 and “significant” refers to p- value < 0.001.
As shown in Table 4 , all three predictors (entropy, density-TC, density-TN) are highly significant ( p <0.0001, after alpha correction because of multi-comparisons) when modeling the concreteness of a noun.
This correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, χ 2 test comparing neurons with versus those without deep dendrites).
The neutralization assay further demonstrated similar consistency when compared with the RBD antibody test using paired convalescent serum samples taken at different time points, with a correlation coefficient for pairing r = 0.952 that was highly significant ( P = 0.0001; Supplementary Fig. 8 ).