“highly significant”

Polynomial regression models for 28-day compressive strength and fluidity were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with F-values of 52.57 and 22.01 and R 2 values of 0.9228 and 0.8334, respectively.

398 genes were shared between the groups, showing highly significant (p<0.0001, Chi-square test) enrichment of genes regulated by ΔNp63α re-expression among differentially expressed genes during EMT.

While the control group maintained a baseline oxidant status, Tempol treatment induced a significant increase ( p < 0.01), and ML210 treatment resulted in a highly significant elevation ( p < 0.0001) in oxidant levels.

We observed a highly significant difference (p value = 0.0001) between patients’ antibody response to P3/FUR/x3 based on their disease status.

Regarding retention scores, a highly significant treatment effect was found (H [3] = 21.24, p<0.0001).

Palmitic acid (C16:0) exhibited a highly significant diet effect ( p = 0.0001), with the highest levels in SBM compared with both RRC and FRC.

Eight patients (8.6%) had an ESS score more than 9, which is the normal cutoff limit.One month later (ESS2) the mean was10.99 ± 4.569 and ranged from zero to 22, and 60 patients (64.5%) crossed the cutoff limit,i.e., the ESS 1 was worse one month following the stroke.The change was also very highly significant ( p = 0 0.0001).

Two-way mixed ANOVA showed a highly significant Time × Treatment interaction (F (4,95) = 39.77, P < 0.0001), along with significant main effects of Time (F (1,95) = 356.8, P < 0.0001) and Treatment (F (4,95) = 147.1, P < 0.0001).

The sensitivity model showed only a minimal reduction in explanatory performance compared with the main model, with an R 2 of 0.721 and an adjusted R 2 of 0.716; the overall model remained highly significant (F = 135.38; p < 0.0001) ( Tables S8–S10 ).

Correlation analyses ( Figure 1 ) further showed a highly significant negative correlation between pH and total acidity ( p < 0.0001), confirming their strong coupling throughout the distillation process.

The difference in virus recovery rates between 4–9 dpf and 10–16 dpf midges fed on WTD with high-titer viremia versus those fed on WTD with low-titer viremia were highly significant (p<0.0001).

66 The model's validity is confirmed by a very low mean square value of 0.7058 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

When restricting analysis to the 73 AD subjects only, MMSE (r=.44) and DRS (r=.54) correlations remain highly significant ( P <.0001), but not with AVLT (r=0.16, P=0.17).

Modules turquoise_1, turquoise_2, yellow_3, and brown_3 revealed highly significant pathways ( p < 0.0001) related to neutrophil degranulation, phagosome formation, and pyroptosis signaling.

A highly significant difference ( P = 0.0001) was noticed on all 4 days.

This analysis revealed a highly significant impact of the baseline value (p < 0.0001) and no impact for the group (p = 0.692).

Pairwise comparisons showed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) between protected and unprotected lands, as well as between partially protected and unprotected lands.

Analysis of spectra counts showed a highly significant elevation of immunoglobulins in MS CSF ( Figures 5B , ANOVA p < 0.0001).

The results presented in Table S3 showed that the model was highly significant (F-value = 69.52, p < 0.0001).

Mean FID in the 714 populations ranged from 1 to 180 m, mean (SE) = 11.46 m (1.03; back-transformed from log 10 -transformed data), with a highly significant effect of species ( F = 3.06, df = 158, 555, R 2 = 0.47, P <0.0001).

The mOS was NR, 24 months (95% CI 16.53–31.47), and 12 months (95% CI 9.23–14.77), respectively, with highly significant differences across BLAST-mol risk categories ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 1D ).

4b , interaction plots from two-way ANCOVA confirm this observation, revealing a highly significant sex*PD interaction for PC2 ( P < 0.0001) and lack of significant sex- or PD-related differences or interaction for PC1.

Regression analysis of the cured percentage in untreated patients versus the odds ratio of the ten studies analyzed and presented in table S2, revealed a highly significant linear relationship (Spearman Rho = −0.842, adjusted R2 = 0.806, P<0.0001) indicating that centers with good surgical results do not benefit from pretreatment and centers with worse surgical results benefit most from pretreatment.

The remaining 167 F 2 lines showed a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) effect on flowering associated with the SSR markers flanking the HvFT1 locus.

Furthermore, the two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant interaction between CPS concentrations and UVB doses used in the experiment for both keratinocytes and fibroblasts ( P < 0.0001, Fig. 5 ).