“highly significant”

21 This difference is highly significant if we gather the data from all rounds ( p < 10 - 4 , n = 212 , signed-rank test).

The main effect of measurement times was highly significant ( P < .0001) from all three ANOVAs, suggesting that each outcome measure followed a circadian pattern over 24 hours.

Results Soil physico-chemical characteristics The electrical conductivity (EC) was higher at the 0–30 cm depth than at the 30–60 cm depth, and the differences between the EC values were highly significant (t value = 14.8913; p = 0.0001).

Differences between the three groups were highly significant ( n = 7, p < 0.0001 among three groups). 3.2.

The conclusion about the difference in the richness of ground cover species under the different tree dominant canopies remains highly significant (P < 0.0001) for any block size (5 × 5, 10 × 10, or 20 × 20 m) in an ANOVA with mixed effects regarding the spatial connectivity of plots.

All fixed effects showed a highly significant impact on length of productive life ( p < 0.0001).

This was confirmed by comparing the intersample dissimilarities between samples, which were larger for the data sets from acidified soil and were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.0001) (see Fig.

This was confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test for the slopes, which showed no significant difference between the empirical CDF of the RoPs and the estimated exGaussian distribution ( P = 0.108), but a highly significant difference with the estimated Gaussian distribution ( P < 0.0001).

The correlation between NEPSY raw scores (Response set) and BMT- i auditory attention results (“conflict” task) was highly significant [ r = 0.71 (0.53–0.84); p < 0.0001].

Both analyses showed a highly significant correlation with a p -value of <0.0001 each.

p-Values were taken to be significant: *significant 0.05≥p>0.01; **very significant 0.01≥p>0.001; ***highly significant 0.001≥p>0.0001; ****highly significant p≤0.0001.

Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of time ( F 37,962 = 34.6; p < 0.0001) on body mass variations (Fig. 1 a).

Conversely, infection with Foxo1 AdV significantly reduced hepatocyte Fgf21 expression, whereas shFoxo1 AdV infection significantly increased Fgf21 mRNA ( Figure 3G ); as both viruses dose-dependently affected Fgf21, the expected linear trend in Fgf21 expression was also highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Interestingly, we also observed strong positive correlations of serum SFRP5 with circulating concentrations of adiponectin ( r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and this association remained highly significant in multiple regression analysis ( β = 0.50, p < 0.0001), whereas association between SFRP5 and insulin sensitivity was no longer significant after adjusting for serum adiponectin.

Highly significant differences between pre- and post-weaning piglets were found ( P = 0.0001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, for Envfit, Anosim and Adonis tests, respectively).

There was a highly significant statistical difference in IgE levels between patients suffering AFS and chronic hyperplastic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ( P <.0001).

The impact of measurement time on USCL changes in the 2nd cohort comparisons was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

There was, however, a numerically highly significant tendency ( P < 0.0001 by Mann–Whitney test) towards reduced Irgb6 vacuole loading intensity in Irga6-deficient cells relative to the wild-type (wt) cells ( Fig. 6F ), suggesting that the presence of Irga6 may stabilize the loading of Irgb6.

We stratified analyses by sex as it was a highly significant effect modifier (p<0·0001).

Demographics predictor for practice score was highly significant for age ( p =.0001) and BMI ( p =.0001).

In this model, BTG2 expression as well as HER2 expression and patient age were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), whereas Ki67 expression displayed a lower significance ( P = 0.013).

AMOVA that was conducted by grouping the accessions according to their geographic regions of origin and without grouping revealed a highly significant variation among accessions and regions as well as within accessions ( Table 2 ; P < 0.0001).

Between Groups I and III and Groups I and IV, there was a statistically highly significant difference ( P = 0.0001).

This was significant only for gata2b u 5008/ u 5008 , but Pearson’s correlation was highly significant across genotypes (Pearson correlation −0.77, p < 0.0001).

The McNemar test for correlated proportions was highly significant (p < 0.0001), indicating that the hrHPV mRNA proportions are not comparable, although this differed between age groups.