gigantica (FPA-27) antigen was also detected in cattle serum using ELISA with high degrees of sensitivity and specificity (94% and 82%, respectively), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 with a highly significant correlation of p<0.0001.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A highly significant difference was observed in relation to D5 to D6 implantated embryos (12.67±1.37 versus 19.86±1.89, p <0.0001) and in relation to D5 to D6 not implantated (12.76±1.17 versus 19.79±2.17, p <0001).
Such models were highly significant (p < 0.0001) for determining TPC, TFC, ABTS, OH, and DPPH.
AUC analysis revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between untreated infected animals and all treatment groups.
Water use efficiency (WUE) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001; F = 1.460; R square = 0.378; Adjusted R Square = 0.119) in tied ridging, compared to OR and FP in biochar and no-biochar plots ( Table 2 ).
The outcome from ANOVA showed that the rutting quadratic regression model was highly significant because its F-value of 105.16 was high and had a relatively low probability value ( p < 0.0001), implying that the chosen model is significant statistically.
The highly significant p values ( p < 0.0001) showed that there was a significant change in mean value from baseline for all three variables.
Results: Our primary outcome was changes in pre-treatment opioid craving scale (OCS) minus baseline, and we found using a mixed model that the active group had a highly significant treatment * time benefit over the sham group, p < 0.0001, effect size at the last follow-up of 1.5.
Treatment with specific SARS-CoV-2 peptides led to a highly significant increased IFN-γ-release (3.93 ± 0.71 IU/mL vs. 0.34 ± 0.10 IU/mL; p < 0.0001) in convalescents compared to unstimulated whole blood.
Unsurprisingly, this revealed a highly significant effect of awareness (Mann–Whitney U = 0.0001; P < 0.0001); detection of a face stimulus was considerably higher for supraliminal relative to subliminal trials.
sylvestris was highly significant ( p < 0.0001: ****).
The gene expression analysis showed highly significant up-regulation in FLT3 of all AML samples [FLT3-wildtype (0.316 ± 0.05 folds) and FLT3-mutants (0.368 ± 0.03 folds)] in contrast of control group (P = 0.0001).
Meta-analyses Random-effects meta-analysis of trials of adding SGAs versus placebo to antidepressants yielded highly significant superiority of SGAs overall (OR = 1.59 [CI: 1.44–1.75]; z = 9.16, p < 0.0001; Figure 1(a) ).
Factor analysis of 251,877 interception data points produced a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.726 (>0.5) and a highly significant result in Bartlett’s sphericity test ( P <0.0001).
The difference in TsH values between both groups was highly significant ( P < .0001) as well as between group A and control group ( P < .001; according to the all pairwise multiple comparison procedures-Holm-Sidak method).
Barlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( c 2 = 1,106, df = 190; P < 0.0001) suggesting sufficient correlation between variables.
allopatric) and recipient pond, was highly significant ( X2 = 57.9, df = 23, p < 0.0001; Table SI 4 ).
Strikingly, MC903‐treated obese animals had a 68.8% increase in ear thickness after treatment, which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), compared to lean control animals (29.2% increase) (Figure 4B,C ).
Results Inspection of Tuta absoluta infestation At all sampling times the parameters scored showed highly significant differences between the T and S lines ( P < 0.0001, t-test, Table 1 ).
GradCAM which demonstrated that the sensitivity ( p -value < 0.0001 and p -value < 0.0001 respectively) was significantly different however specificity between HR-CAM and Zhou’s CAM did not vary ( p -value > 0.05) conversely between HR-CAM and GradCAM it was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).
Temperature effects on mycelial growth of different Fusarium species According to ANOVA, the average effects of different temperatures on fungal radial growth of Fusarium species were highly significant at P < 0 . 0001 .
The permutation tests indicated that this classification was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Differences were statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*) (#) and highly significant when p < 0.0001 (**) (##) versus each respective mock or KLF1 wild-type control group. 3.
Ordinary one-way ANOVA showed highly significant differences among the four severity groups for all three proteins (all P < 0.0001).
The comparative action of the extract’s activity according to concentration showed that whatever the concentration (from 5 to 25 mg/mL) the dichloromethane extract showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) compared to the other active extracts.