Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction returned a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference between the pure DMEM and each of the tested cell lines, showing that the sensor is capable of detecting adherent cells with respect to medium only, with the resonant frequency of the medium containing cancer cells being consistently lower than that of pure DMEM.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Plasma 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA), the major metabolite of serotonin (5‐HT), was significantly higher in delirious and non‐delirious cognitively impaired subjects as compared to control individuals without delirium and cognitive impairment ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.007), which remained highly significant after excluding patients taking psychotropic medication ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Y 1 = 6.119 + 1.815 A - 4 .626B - 18 .608C + 0.436AB + 0.580AC - 0 .887BC - 0 .633A 2 + 3.269 B 2 + 15.650 C 2 Y 2 = 18.883 + 13.360 A + 49.779B - 186 .192C - 9 .063AB + 7.010AC - 24 .790BC - 3 .289A 2 - 13.194 B 2 + 150.865 C 2 The yield model (Y 1 ) had an F-value of 105.270, indicating highly significant level differences ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Other Clinical Efficacy Results The mean changes from baseline in the IKDC subjective score, which ranges from 0 (worst result) to 100 (best result), were highly significant at all time points (i.e., P < 0.0001; including Month 3) and increased in their extent through Month 24 (LS mean increase from baseline: 41.6 ± 1.9 points; 95% CI: 37.9-45.4).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The Wilks’ lambda value of 0.093 was highly significant ( F (12,96) = 18.2, p = 0.0001), supporting the hypothesis that the examined individuals could be assembled in three morphological groups; the analysis also showed that the individuals were appropriately classified inside the corresponding group.
highly significantP ≤ 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Effect of temperature on yield traits The analysis of the variance (Table 4 ) showed that the variety had a very highly significant effect ( P ≤ 0.0001) on the days to 1% flowering, the days to 50% flowering, the days to maturity of grains, the width of grains, the weight of 1000 grains and the average yield per plant.