“highly significant”

Highly significant differences in life stages mortality among concentration were found by direct spray (df = 4, 149, p ≤ 0.0001) for 2nd instar: F = 26.01, 3rd instar: F = 22.20, 4th instar: F = 18.04, 5th instar: F = 13.63, and adult: F = 6.25 and by contact (df = 4, 149, p ≤ 0.0001) for 2nd instar: F = 16.06, 3rd instar: F = 9.95, 4th instar: F = 21.23, 5th instar: F = 6.29, and adult: F = 3.78 with an obvious decreasing pathogenicity pattern from younger to older instars to adult stage at all concentrations.

The U-JVP Ruler technique was only able to produce a moderate correlation with CVP, although their relationship remained highly significant ( r = 0.63, 95% CI 0.6059–0.7978, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 b).

Statistical analysis using Mann Whitney test showed that the differences between control and treated groups were highly significant with P value <0.0001 in all cases ( Figure 6 ).

The relationship between this calculated projected area (PA) and the true leaf area should diminish over time, as plant architecture and leaf self-shading cannot be corrected from a single photo; however, correlations between average PA and average biomass remained highly significant on day 14 ( r = 0.67; P < 0.0001).

There were highly significant differences among the weights (wet) of the three life stages (ANOVA, F = 15.299, df = 62, 2, P < 0.0001).

Furthermore, systematic comparison of expression alterations across all genes found to be differentially expressed in chronic hyperglycemia [ 52 ] with our chip data, demonstrated a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.62; p < 0.0001; Figure 4J ).

Gentamicin showed the most prominent change, with a highly significant shift in overall susceptibility distribution (χ2 = 95.27, p < 0.0001).

Only the experimental group of combined CIP with PIC maintained a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) within 24 h for these two strains.

The associations remained significant for both KIR2DS2 (p = 0.0083 p c = 0.1162; OR = 2.06; 95%CI = 1.2–3.4) and KIR2DS3 (p = 0.0008 p c = 0.0112; OR = 2.37; 95%CI = 1.4–3.9), and the KIR profile composed of all three genes was also highly significant, showing an even higher OR (p < 0.0001 p c = 0.0014; OR = 3 95%CI 1.8–4.7).

The foliar area consumed with infestation at flowering ( Fig 9 Left) showed a highly significant effect of Species, Stage, Variety, Species x Variety and Species x Stage x Variety (p<0.0001 in all the cases), as well as a Stage x Species (p = 0.0019) and Stage x Variety (p = 0.0042).

After accounting for differences due to strategy, mean age and mean PSA in the meta-regression analysis, the amount of residual heterogeneity between studies was calculated to be 76.0, which is highly significant at the 5% level (QE = 176.8, p<0.0001).

Not surprisingly, all six regressions are also highly significant (p < .0001).

The ANCOVA analysis revealed highly significant differences between the elevations (F = 19.07, DFn = 1, DFd = 205, P < 0.0001). 3.2.3 Determination of antibody avidity maturation We determined the relative avidity index to appraise the antibody binding strength ( Fig 5 ).

Under 200 mg/kg of Cd 2+ , the Cd 2+ contamination in the shoots and roots of transgenic plants was 24.6−30.5% and 45.5−51.3% higher than that of the WT, respectively ( Figure 4 c,d), and all of the transgenic lines showed a highly significant difference compared with the WT ( p < 0.0001).

The Adonis test confirmed the highly significant association of virome composition with hive and location ( P < 0.0001 by an Adonis-Bray test; R 2 , 0.62964 and 0.45389). k-means clustering had for k 13 (representing hives) an adjusted mutual information score (taking on values from 1 for identical to around 0 for random) of 0.14, suggesting the existence of a pattern in clustering ( Fig.

Regarding age distribution, a significant proportion of individuals in Group 1 were under 25 years old, but this age bracket was not represented in Group 2, leading to a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

The clustering observed was found to be highly significant, and we identified 159 unexpectedly large (at least 400 Kb; p<1e-04) clusters of divergent regions with a median size of 800 Kb ( Figure 3 ; Table S2 ).

The difference of CRP between the groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The ANOVA analysis shows that there is a highly significant influence of the coffee variety ( p < 0.0001) and the raw material ( p < 0.0001) on methanol concentration.

The correlation with MacBlo is highly significant not only for the mean of the three sites ( r = 0.55, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2B ) but also for each of the individual sites ( r = 0.35, P = 0.0001: Hamma Hamma and MacBlo; r = 0.57, P < 0.0001: Lake Washington and MacBlo; r = 0.39, P = 0.0001, Price Lake and MacBlo).

Contemporaneous and between person models The within-person contemporaneous network was also dense with most associations highly significant (p < 0.0001).

By applying a paired t test, the differences between the WN and RNN model to the TAtt model were shown to be both highly significant with p ≤ 0.0001 across subjects (Cohen’s d = 10.68 and d = 10.66, respectively).

(Additional file 1 : Tables S3, S4) Mediation analyses using the Cox and Hertzmark methods indicated that BMI's effect could explain 16.1% (95% CI, 9.1%-27.1%) of the impact of adding salt to food on incident sleep apnea and is highly significant with a P < 0.0001.

Across 126 experiments, Sjoberg and Cole found a small but highly significant advantage in women ( d = 0.12, p < .0001).

Treatment had a highly significant effect on disease control (F(3,8) = 1553, p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.9983).