“highly significant”

Highly significant values ( p < 0.0001) are shown in red.

Population expansions appear to have been more prominent in the southern part of the distribution, with highly significant negative F s values for the Gulf Coast ( F s = −24.98, p < 0.0001), and West Florida ( F s = −13.5, p < 0.0001), and with localities such as Cedar Key (CKFL) and Apalachicola (APFL) representing clear examples.

Statistical significance is indicated in the figures by asterisks, using the following standard notation: * for p ≤ 0.05 (significant), ** for p ≤ 0.01 (very significant), *** for p ≤ 0.001 (highly significant), and **** for p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant).

When considering only the oil content factor across the three extrusion conditions, a highly significant effect of oil content on glutamate release was observed ( p < 0.0001) (Figure 7 ).

Highly significant IOV was demonstrated for CT based contouring of the tumour bed (p < 0.0001), while agreement was high for the MRI-based approach.

The increase in the rates of thyroid admission was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.

Regarding schistosomiasis, cysteine peptidases, such as papain, Schistosoma mansoni cathepsin B1 (SmCB1) and cathepsin L3 (SmCL3) and Fasciola hepatica cathepsin L1 (FhCL1) do not induce allergic reactions in mice or hamsters and were shown instead to elicit reproducible and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) reduction of 50–65% in challenge S. mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium infection, via generation of polarized (papain, SmCL3, FhCL)- or predominant (SmCB1) type 2 responses involving release of TSLP, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and generation of IgG1 antibodies [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] .

There was a highly significant difference between the South District and each of the five other districts (p < 0.0001) as follows: Jerusalem (IRR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.14–0.29), North (IRR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12–0.22), Haifa (IRR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.11–0.27), Center (IRR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07–0.23), and Tel Aviv (IRR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01–0.44).

Effect of removal of the guarding female When the guarding female was removed, the decrease in offspring survival was highly significant in both species (binomial GLM, C. cucurbitina : deviance = 39.18, df = 1, P < 0.0001, C. chalybea : deviance = 10.92, df = 1, P = 0.0009; Table 2 and Fig. 4 ).

Whole mite extract responses also differed between groups, with Aca s exhibiting a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001), while Tyr p showed a moderate but notable difference ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 2a ). 3.3.

We observed moderate but highly significant agreement between positivity by SBP1 and REX1 (agreement = 75.4%, kappa = 0.33; P < 0.0001) and PHISTb and REX1 (agreement = 86.4%, kappa = 0.15; P < 0.001) and lower agreement between SBP1 and PHISTb (agreement = 71.1%, kappa = 0.12; P < 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

All the estimates were highly significant for discriminating Class +1 and Class −1 ( P < .0001) and had similar z scores representing the relative effect size.

There was no association between the consistency of weight tracking and the prevalence of excessive GWG in low income women (p = 0.47), and there is a highly significant association in not-low income women (p ≤ 0.0001).

This analysis showed a highly significant positive correlation between the two datasets for both the SLC transporters (r = 0.9157, P < 0.0001) and the ABC transporters (r = 0.8368, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 , Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 ), providing further confidence in our approach.

An independent samples t- test was performed which showed a highly significant difference difference in the crowding effect between the older and younger group ( t(30.92)= – 5.83, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d=-1.94) [see Fig. 8] .

While no significant difference was observed between ZH11 and the transgenic family carrying no transgene, highly significant effects ( P < 0.0001) were detected for the five T 2 families carrying homozygous transgene (Table 4 ).

RESULTS: Diabetic patients showed highly significant decrease in the level of visfatin compared to the control group (P = 0.0001).

When the tested populations were compared at the highest dose of idebenone (0.5 μM), the differences between NSC [130% (±4.40)] versus NP [103.81% (±2.45)] and eNP [138.19% (±10.78)] versus NP [103.81% (±2.35)], were highly significant (####; p < 0.0001).

For the primary variable GIS the difference between placebo and verum after 28 days of treatment showed a highly significant (p < 0.0001) difference between placebo and verum (6.7 resp. 4.7 points).

Both were highly significant, priming SOA: F (1, 19) = 31.1, p < .0001, MSE = 129.9, task: F (2, 19) = 8.3, p < .001, MSE = 72.13.

We observed a highly significant effect of genotype ( P < 0.0001, H 2 = 0.23) in ovariole number CV E , but could not detect a genetic component of variance in ovariole asymmetry CV E ( H 2 = 0; P = 0.65) ( Figure 2 and Table S3 in File S2 ).

Both cell lines exhibited a marked decline in cell numbers for each siRNA relative to the negative control (Figure 5a and 5b ), along with a highly significant increase (3.9 fold; P < 0.0001) in the late apoptotic cell fraction assessed by FACs analysis of an annexin V staining assay (Figure 6a and 6b ).

A highly significant correlation ( ρ 0.43, p < 0.0001) between cyclin D1 mRNA and protein expression has also been reported [ 29 ].

According to analysis of inferred metagenomic functional content using PICRUSt algorithm, a highly significant discrepancy in metabolism and immune functions ( P < 0.0001) was predicted in the obese group.

There was also a highly significant (P<0.0001) difference in the IMA levels amongst the two types of malaria; falciparum (0.69 ± 0.05) and vivax (0.44 ± 0.06) ABSU ( Figure 2 ).