Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Measurement error The ANOVAs for centroid size and shape both reveal that the “Individual” main effect is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), which means that the variation among flowers greatly exceeds the measurement error due to “Imaging” and “Digitising” ( Table 1 ).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
1a ), supra-threshold amplitudes of wave I of the ABR (in response to 50-μs clicks) remained low and showed significantly shallower growth with sound intensity, compared to pre-exposure values (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for pre-exposure and 4-week post-exposure data showed a significant effect of group, p = 0.043, and a highly significant interaction between time of measurement and sound intensity, p = 0.0001; Fig. 1b ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A GLM with a negative binomial distribution with a log link function showed a highly significant positive effect of nest type on the number of trips per female [slope = 2.902, t = 7.078, P < 0.0001, dp = 1.119; dp is the dispersion parameter of the model, and when this is 1, the dispersion of the data from the model is within the predicted variance from the model (meaning the model fitted well to the observed data)].
highly significantP < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A slight increase in potassium (within normal reference ranges) was significant ( P < .05) and decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were highly significant ( P < .0001).
Abstracts
Global advances in health and medicine : improving healthcare outcomes worldwide · 2018 · PMC6153547
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
From the statistical analysis, desirable determination coefficients ( R 2 ), 0.9858 for CPT and 0.9912 for BA, were obtained for the calculated model; the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05); and the highly significant level obtained for the model ( p < 0.0001) indicated that it was precise and applicable.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Controlling for weight and food intake, differences in CD11d mRNA abundance comparing controls and high-Ca mice were not statistically significant, but the reduction in CD11d expression in mice fed high-Ca + NFDM remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).